Does the choice model method and/or the data matter?

Transportation

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 351-385

  Hensher, David A ^a   Rose, John M ^a   Li, Zheng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Discrete choice models; Generalized mixed logit; Latent class; Mixed logit; MNL; Multiple data sets; New Zealand; Scale; Scale MNL; Stated choice

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; LATENT CLASS; MIXED LOGIT; MNL; MULTIPLE DATA; NEW ZEALAND; SCALE; SCALE MNL; STATED CHOICE;

SEPARATION;

ESTIMATION;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; LOGIT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AUSTRALIA; NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 84856731922     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-011-9329-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Daly, A., Hess, S., Train, K.: Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. http://elsa. berkeley. edu/~train/papers. html (2010).
2. Fiebig, D., Keane, M., Louviere, J., Wasi, N.: The generalized multinomial logit: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Market. Sci., published online before print July 23 (2009). doi: 10. 1287/mksc. 1090. 0508.
3. Greene, W. H., Hensher, D. A.: A latest class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transp. Res. B 37, 681-698 (2003).
4. Greene, W. H., Hensher, D. A.: Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? A comparative assessment of logit models. Transportation 37(3), 413-428 (2010).
5. Hensher, D. A.: Attribute Processing, Heuristics and Preference Construction in Choice Analysis. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (eds.) State-of Art and State-of Practice in Choice Modelling, pp. 35-70. Emerald Press, UK (2010).
6. Hensher, D. A., Greene, W. H.: Mixed logit models: state of practice. Transportation 30(2), 133-176 (2003).
7. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J., Greene, W. H.: Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
8. Keane, M.: The generalized logit model: preliminary ideas on a research program, presentation at Motorola- CenSoC Hong Kong Meeting, 22 Oct (2006).
9. Li, Z., Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M.: Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: a review and some new empirical evidence. Transp. Res. E 46(3), 384-403 (2010).
10. Louviere, J., Eagle, T.: Confound it! that pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions. In: Proceedings, 2006 Sawtooth Software Conference, pp. 211-228, Sawtooth Software, Sequem, Washington, USA (2006).
11. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J.: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications in Marketing, Transportation and Environmental Valuation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
12. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A.: Combining data sources. In: Hensher, D. A., King, J. (eds). Workshop Report, 9th International Association of Travel Behaviour Research Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, July. The Leading Edge of Travel Behaviour Research. pp. 125-144. Pergamon Press, Oxford (2001).
13. Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C. J.: Stated preference experimental design strategies'. In: Hensher, D. A., Button, K. (eds.) Transport Modelling, Handbooks in Transport, vol. 1. Elsevier Science, Oxford (2007). Chapter 8.
14. Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C., Hensher, Collins, A. T.: Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transp. Res. B 42(4), 395-406 (2008).
15. Small, K. A., Noland, R. B., Chu, X., Lewis, D.: Valuation of travel-time savings and predictability in congested conditions for highway user-cost estimation. NCHRP Report 431. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council (1999).
16. Train, K. E.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
17. Train, K., Wilson, W. W.: Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices. Transp. Res. B 42, 191-203 (2008).