Adoption of surgical innovations: Factors influencing use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 379-386

  Wright, Frances C ^a   Gagliardi, Anna R ^b   Fraser, Novlette ^a   Quan, May Lynn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

adoption; breast cancer; Roger's diffusion of innovation theory; sentinel lymph node biopsy; technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; GROUNDED THEORY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOTIVATION; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PATHOLOGIST; PHYSICIAN; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SNOWBALL SAMPLE; SURGEON; TELECONSULTATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANADA; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 84856721687     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350611409063     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C, et al. Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surg. 2001 ; 234: 292-299
2. McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg. 2005 ; 48: 185-194 (Pubitemid 40910643)
3. Harish K. Sentinel node biopsy: concepts and current status. Front Biosci. 2005 ; 10: 2618-2644 (Pubitemid 40905266)
4. Amersi F, Hansen NM. The benefits and limitations of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006 ; 7: 141-151
5. Chapgar AB, McMasters KM. Treatment of sentinel node-positive breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006 ; 6: 1233-1239 (Pubitemid 44304691)
6. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Recht A, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 ; 201: 586-597 (Pubitemid 41393082)
7. GeorgeRQuanMLMcCreadyDMcLeodRRumbleRB; Expert Panel on SLNB in Breast Cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: guideline recommendations. http://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId= 45870. Accessed December 16, 2009.
8. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 ; 23: 7703-7720 (Pubitemid 46291835)
9. Lucci A, Kelemen PR, Miller C, Chardkoff L, Wilson L. National practice patterns of sentinel lymph node dissection for breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 ; 192: 453-458 (Pubitemid 32289065)
10. Gaston MS, Dixon JM. A survey of surgical management of the axilla in UK breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2004 ; 40: 1738-1742 (Pubitemid 38902910)
11. Quan ML, Hodgson N, Lovrics P, Porter G, Poirier B, Wright FC. National adoption of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: lessons learned from the Canadian experience. Breast J. 2008 ; 14: 421-427
12. Using Knowledge and Evidence in Health Care. Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Lemieux-Charles L Champagne F, ed. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press ; 2004 :
13. Rogers EM Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press ; 2003 :
14. Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. A qualitative study of increasing β-blocker use after myocardial infarction: why do some hospitals succeed?. JAMA. 2001 ; 285: 2604-2611 (Pubitemid 32479900)
15. Ellerbeck EF, Bhimaraj A, Hall S. Impact of organizational infrastructure on β-blocker and aspirin therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006 ; 152: 579-584 (Pubitemid 44233413)
16. Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, et al. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003 ; 327: 33-35 (Pubitemid 36801894)
17. Strauss A, Corbin J Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2 nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ; 1998 :
18. Hutchison S Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective. Munhall PL Oiler CJ, ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts ; 111-130.
19. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000 ; 320: 114-116 (Pubitemid 30173056)
20. Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York, NY: New York University Press ; 2003 :
21. San Martin-Rodriguez L, D'Amour D, Leduc N. Outcomes of interprofessional collaboration for hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2008 ; 31: E18 - E27
22. Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 ; ( 1 ):
23. Doumit G, Gattellari M, Grimshaw J, O'Brien MA. Local opinion leaders: effects of professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 ; ( 1 ):
24. Hunter JG, Sackier JM, Berci G. Training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program. Quantifying the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 1994 ; 8: 28-31
25. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G. Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg. 2001 ; 233: 159-166 (Pubitemid 32106068)
26. Gagliardi AR, Wright FC. Exploratory evaluation of surgical skills mentorship program design and outcomes. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 ; 30: 51-56
27. Birch DW, Asiri AH, de Gara CJ. The impact of a formal mentoring program for minimally invasive surgeon on surgeon practice and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2007 ; 193: 589-591
28. The American Society of Breast Surgeons. Consensus statement on guidelines for performing sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer. December2005. http://www.breastsurgeons.org/PDF-statements/SLN-Dissection.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2010.
29. Curtis JP, Luebbert JJ, Wang Y, et al. Association of physician certification and outcomes among patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. JAMA. 2009 ; 301: 1661-1670
30. Larson DW, Marcello PW, Larach SW, et al. Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing. Ann Surg. 2008 ; 248: 746-750
31. Birch DW, Bonjer HJ, Crossley C, et al. Canadian consensus conference on the development of training and practice standards in advanced minimally invasive surgery. Can J Surg. 2009 ; 52: 321-327
32. Dorsey JH. Education and credentialing of the gynecologic laser surgeon. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1991 ; 18: 661-665
33. Schwartz BF. Training requirements and credentialing for laparoscopic and robotic surgery-what are our responsibilities?. J Urol. 2009 ; 182: 828-829
34. Casanova D. Surgical accreditation in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2009 ; 41: 998-1000