Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-50

  Pignone, Michael P ^a   Brenner, Alison T ^a   Hawley, Sarah ^b   Sheridan, Stacey L ^a   Lewis, Carmen L ^a   Jonas, Daniel E ^a   Howard, Kirsten ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; conjoint analysis; preferences; rating ranking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; CHOICE BASED CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; EUROPEAN AMERICAN; FEMALE; GRADUATE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING AND RANKING TASK; REGISTER;

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BAYES THEOREM; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84856710501     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1837-z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. CH Braddock 3rd KA Edwards NM Hasenberg TL Laidley W Levinson 1999 Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics JAMA 282 24 2313 20 10612318 10.1001/jama.282.24.2313 (Pubitemid 30013062)
2. SL Sheridan RP Harris SH Woolf 2004 Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Am J Prev Med 26 1 56 66 14700714 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011 PMID 14700714 (Pubitemid 38045175)
3. AM O'Connor CL Bennett D Stacey M Barry NF Col KB Eden, et al. 2009 Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8 3 CD001431 Review PMID: 19588325
4. M Pignone R Harris L Kinsinger 2000 Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial Ann Intern Med 133 10 761 9 11085838 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjsFKjsA%3D%3D PMID: 11085838
5. G Elwyn A O'Connor D Stacey R Volk A Edwards A Coulter, et al. 2006 Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process BMJ 333 7565 417 16908462 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE (Pubitemid 44320126)
6. AM O'Connor C Bennett D Stacey MJ Barry NF Col KB Eden, et al. 2007 Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis Med Decis Mak 27 5 554 74 10.1177/0272989X07307319 Epub 2007 Sep 14. Review PMID: 17873255 (Pubitemid 47547608)
7. G Elwyn AM O'Connor C Bennett RG Newcombe M Politi MA Durand, et al. 2009 Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) PLoS One 4 3 e4705 19259269 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705 Epub 2009 Mar 4.PMID: 19259269
8. M Ryan K Gerard 2003 Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 1 55 64 14619274
9. M Ryan S Farrar 2000 Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care BMJ 320 1530 1533 10834905 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3psV2msA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30330316)
10. AM O'Connor GA Wells P Tugwell A Laupacis T Elmslie E Drake 1999 The effects of an 'explicit' values clarification exercise in a woman's decision aid regarding postmenopausal hormone therapy Health Expect 2 1 21 32 11281872 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00027.x PMID: 11281872 (Pubitemid 29287468)
11. SL Sheridan J Griffith L Behrend Z Gizlice J Cai MP Pignone 2010 Effect of adding a values clarification exercise to a decision aid on heart disease prevention: a randomized trial Med Decis Mak 30 4 E28 39 10.1177/ 0272989X10369008 Epub 2010 May 18. PMID: 20484089
12. JM Griffith CL Lewis S Hawley SL Sheridan MP Pignone 2009 Randomized trial of presenting absolute v. relative risk reduction in the elicitation of patient values for heart disease prevention with conjoint analysis Med Decis Mak 29 2 167 74 10.1177/0272989X08327492 Epub 2009 Mar 11.PMID: 19279298
13. ST Hawley RJ Volk P Krishnamurthy M Jibaja-Weiss SW Vernon S Kneuper 2008 Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients Med Care 46 9 Suppl 1 S10 6 18725820 10.1097/MLR. 0b013e31817d932e PMID: 18725820
14. J Kim A Whitney S Hayter C Lewis M Campbell L Sutherland, et al. 2005 Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 28 5 36 10.1186/1472-6947-5-36 PMID: 16313676 (Pubitemid 41831542)
15. M Pignone M Rich SM Teutsch AO Berg KN Lohr 2002 Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 137 2 132 41 12118972 PMID: 12118972 (Pubitemid 34779159)
16. M Pignone S Saha T Hoerger J Mandelblatt 2002 Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 137 2 96 104 12118964 PMID: 12118964 (Pubitemid 34779153)
17. DE Jonas LB Russell RS Sandler J Chou M Pignone 2007 Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 11 2401 10 17608779 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01387.x Epub 2007 Jun 29. PMID: 17608779 (Pubitemid 47631758)
18. DE Jonas LB Russell RS Sandler J Chou M Pignone 2008 Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study Med Decis Mak 28 1 56 65 10.1177/0272989X07309643 PMID: 18263561
19. Johnson RM, Orme BK. how many questions should you ask in choice-based conjoint studies? Sawtooth software research paper series 1996.
20. A Barratt K Howard L Irwig G Salkeld N Houssami 2005 Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices BMJ 23 330 7497 936 Epub 2005 Mar 8.PMID: 15755755
21. Johnson R. Monotonicity constraints in choice-based conjoint with hierarchical Bayes Sawtooth software technical paper series 2000, available at www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
22. Bryan Orme, John Howell. Application of covariates within Sawtooth software's CBC/HB program: theory and practical example. Sawtooth software technical paper series 2009, available at www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
23. Huber J. Achieving individual-level predictions from CBC data: comparing ICE and hierarchical bayes. Sawtooth technical paper series 1998, available at www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
24. Sheridan SL, Golin C, Harris RP, Driscoll D, Deal AM, Enemchukwu E, et al. A pilot randomized trial of two types of values clarification exercises to facilitate informed decision making for prostate cancer screening. Society of general internal medicine meeting (poster). Pittsburgh, PA. April 2008.
25. DA Marshall FR Johnson KA Phillips JK Marshall L Thabane NA Kulin 2007 Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey Value Health 10 5 415 30 17888107 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007. 00196.x PMID: 17888107 (Pubitemid 47481113)
26. AC DeBourcy S Lichtenberger S Felton KT Butterfield DJ Ahnen TD Denberg 2008 Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening J Gen Intern Med 23 2 169 74 18157581 10.1007/s11606-007-0480-1 Epub 2007 Dec 21
27. NK Shokar CA Carlson SC Weller 2010 Informed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population Ann Fam Med 8 2 141 50 20212301 10.1370/afm.1054
28. A Imaeda D Bender L Fraenkel 2010 What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? J Gen Intern Med 25 7 688 93 20309740 10.1007/s11606-010-1318-9 Epub 2010 Mar 23
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2010 Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59 26 808 12 PubMed PMID: 20613704