Adherence to national guidelines for surveillance after curative resection of nonmetastatic colon and rectum cancer: A survey among Norwegian gastrointestinal surgeons

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 320-324

  Soreide K ^a,b   Traeland J H ^a   Stokkeland, P J ^a   Glomsaker, T ^a   Soreide J A ^a,b   Korner H ^a,b  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Guidelines; Imaging; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; DISTANT METASTASIS; EVALUATION AND FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; NORWAY; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON;

COLONIC NEOPLASMS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NORWAY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84856702222     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02631.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007: CD002200.
2. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1783-99.
3. Søreide K. Endoscopic surveillance after curative surgery for sporadic colorectal cancer: patient-tailored, tumor-targeted or biology-driven? Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 1255-61.
4. Papagrigoriadis S. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: the evidence is in favour but we are still in need of a protocol. Int J Surg 2007; 5: 120-8.
5. Miles K, Burkill G. Colorectal cancer: imaging surveillance following resection of primary tumour. Cancer Imaging 2007; 7 Spec No A: S143-9.
6. Kørner H, Søreide K, Stokkeland PJ, Søreide JA. Systematic follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal cancer in Norway: a population-based audit of effectiveness, costs, and compliance. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 320-8.
7. Kørner H, Søreide K, Stokkeland PJ, Søreide JA. Diagnostic accuracy of serum-carcinoembryonic antigen in recurrent colorectal cancer: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 417-23.
8. Boulin M, Lejeune C, Le Teuff G et al. Patterns of surveillance practices after curative surgery for colorectal cancer in a French population. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1890-9.
9. Connor S, Frizelle FA, Bagshaw PF. Follow-up after attempted curative surgery for colorectal cancer; postal survey of New Zealand surgeons' practice. NZ Med J 2001; 114: 151-3.
10. Grossmann I, de Bock GH, van de Velde CJ, Kievit J, Wiggers T. Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 787-92.
11. Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2010) National guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer (Issue # IS-1972, in Norwegian) (Ed. Norwegian Directorate of Health), pp. 1-159. Oslo, Norway.
12. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 2078-86.
13. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 849-57.
14. Søreide K, Slewa A, Stokkeland PJ et al. Microsatellite instability and DNA ploidy in colorectal cancer: potential implications for patients undergoing systematic surveillance after resection. Cancer 2009; 115: 271-82.
15. Kosmider S, Field K, Jefford M, Jennens R, Gibbs P. Surveillance following treatment for colorectal cancer in Australia. Has best practice been adopted by medical oncologists?. Intern Med J 2008; 38: 415-21.
16. Giordano P, Efron J, Vernava AM III, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 2006; 10: 199-207.
17. Augestad KM, Vonen B, Aspevik R et al. Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 137.
18. Strand E, Nygren I, Bergkvist L, Smedh K. Nurse or surgeon-led follow-up after rectal cancer: a randomised trial. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 999-1003.
19. Sorensen N, Jensen A, Wille-Jorgensen P et al. Strict follow-up programme including CT and F-FDG-PET after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: e224-8.
20. Cardella J, Coburn NG, Gagliardi A et al. Compliance, attitudes and barriers to post-operative colorectal cancer follow-up. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 407-15.
21. Macafee DA, Whynes DK, Scholefield JH. Risk-stratified intensive follow up for treated colorectal cancer - realistic and cost saving? Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 222-30.
22. Wille-Jørgensen P, Laurberg S, Påhlman L et al. An interim analysis of recruitment to the COLOFOL trial. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 756-8.