Life-cycle analysis of embodied energy for aging bridges subject to seismic hazards

Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering -Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 562-569

  Ghosh, Jayadipta ^a   Tapia, Citlali ^a   Padgett, Jamie E ^a  

^a Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DETERIORATION; HAZARDS; INVESTMENTS; PROBABILITY; REPAIR; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BRIDGE DETERIORATION; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NON-HOMOGENEOUS POISSON PROCESS MODELS; REPAIR AND REHABILITATIONS; STEEL GIRDER BRIDGE; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT; SUSTAINABLE IMPACTS;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84856700022     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1201/b11332-85     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Alcorn, A. and Wood, P., New Zealand Building Materials Embodied Energy Coefficients Database, Vol. 2, Centre for Building Performance Research Report, November 1998.
2. Alcorn, Andrew, Embodied Energy and CO2 Coefficients for New Zealand Building Materials, Centre for Building Performance Research Report, March 2003.
3. Alcorn, Andrew, Embodied Energy and CO2 Coefficients for New Zealand Building Materials, Centre for Building Performance Research Report, Nov. 2001.
4. Amekudzi, A., Khisty, C.J., and Khayesi, M., Using the sustainability footprint model to assess development impacts of transportation systems, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 43, 2009, pg. 339-348.
5. ASCE. (2009). "ASCE: Infrastructure Fact Sheet." .
6. Colorado Section of ASCE, Resource Guide to the Colorado Infrastructure Report Card, 2008.
7. Dasgupta, S. and Tam, E.K.L., Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 32, 2005, pg. 30-44.
8. Dorf, R.C., Technology, Humans, and Society: Toward a Sustainable World: Academic Press, 2001.
9. Enright, M.P., and Frangopol, D.M. (1998). " Probabilistic analysis of resistance degradation of reinforced concrete bridge beams under corrosion. " Engineering Structures, 20(11), 960-971.
10. Frangopol DM., (1999). Life-cycle cost analysis for bridges, Bridge Safety and Reliability, Reston, VA, USA; pg. 210-36.
11. Ghosh, J., and Padgett, J.E. (2010). " Aging Considerations in the Development of Time-Dependent Seismic Fragility Curves. " Journal of Structural Engineering, In Press doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000260.
12. Haggarty, P., Valencia, M.E., McNeill, G., Gonzales, N.L., Moya, S.Y., Pinelli, A., Quihui, L., Saucedo, M.S., Esparza, J., Ashton, J., Milne, E., James, P.T., Energy Expediture During Heavy Work and its Interaction With Body Weight, British Journal of Nutrition, 1997, pg. 359-373.
13. Herman Daly, Beyond Growth, Beacon Press, 1992.
14. IISI, World Steel Life Cycle Inventory-Methodology Report, International Iron and Steel Institute, Committee on Environmental Affairs, Brussels 2002.
15. Jeon, C.M. and Amekudzi, A., Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 11, 2005, pg. 31-50.
16. Kesik, T., Measures of Sustainability, Canadian Architect. 2002. Business Information Group. 9 May 2008 .
17. Kreijger, P.C., Ecological Properties of Building Materials, Materials and Structures 20, 1987, pg. 248-254.
18. Litman, T., Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A recommendation program to define a standard set of indicators for sustainable transportation planning, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC 2008.
19. Long, Adrian E., Sustainable Bridges Through Innovative Advances, Joint ICE and TRF Fellows Lecture, 2 May 2007, pg. 3.
20. Mander, J.B., Kim, D., Chen, S., and Premus, G. (1996). Response of steel bridge bearings to reversed cyclic loading. NCEER.
21. Melchers, R.E. (1999). Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd (Import).
22. M. Nisbet, M. Marceau, and M. Van Geem, Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete, Portland Cement Association, Stokie, IL 2002.
23. Nielson, B. (2005). "Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones." PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
24. Padgett, J.E., Ghosh, J., Dennemann, K., Sustainable Infrastructure Systems Subjected to Multiple Threats, in 2009 TCLEE Conference, Oakland, CA, 2009.
25. Pearce, A.R., Rehabilitation as a Strategy to Increase the Sustainability of the Built Environment, Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004.
26. Rix, G., and Fernandez, J. (2004). "Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation." (Oct. 19, 2009).
27. R.S. Means Co., RSMeans Building Construction Cost Data 2009, 67th Annual Edition, 2008.
28. Sahely H.R., Kennedy C.A., Adams B.J., "Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems." Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2005; 32: pg. 72-85.
29. The Institution of Structural Engineers, Building for a Sustainable Future: Construction without Depletion, November 1999.
30. Thoft-Christensen., Life-cycle cost-benefit (LCCB) analysis of bridges from a user and social point of view, Structure Infrastructure Engineering, 5(1): pg. 49-57, 2009.
31. Ugwu, O.O., Kumaraswamy, M.M., Kung, F., Ng, S.T., Object-Oriented Framework for Durability Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of Highway Bridges, Automatic in Construction, 14, 2005, pg. 611-632.
32. Venkatarama Reddy, B.V. and Jagadish, K.S., Embodied energy of common and alternative building technologies. Energy Build., 2002, 35, 129-137.
33. Venkatarama Reddy, B.V., Sustainable Building Technologies, Current Science, Vol. 87 (7), 10 October 2004, pg. 899-907.
34. Wen, Y.K., and Wu, C.L. (2001). "Uniform Hazard Ground Motions for Mid-America Cities." Earthquake Spectra, 17(2), 359-384.
35. Weyers, R.E., Fitch, M., Larsen, E., Al-Qadi, I., and Hoffman, P. (1994). Concrete Bridge Protection and Rehabilitation: Chemical and Physical Techniques. Service Life Estimates. Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington D.C., 357.
36. Whiting, D., Stejskal, B., and Nagi, M. (1990). Condition of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Components: Technology Review and Field Surveys. Federal Highway Administration, Washington.