A simple nomogram to evaluate the risk of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with minimal sentinel node involvement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 567-576

  Meretoja, T J ^a   Strien, L ^a   Heikkila P S ^a   Leidenius, M H K ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST METASTASIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RISK; CELL ISOLATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DISEASE MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROMETASTASIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NOMOGRAM; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PUBLISHING; TUMOR CELL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM MICROMETASTASIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NOMOGRAMS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 84856666654     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1882-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. U Veronesi G Paganelli G Viale, et al. 2003 A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer N Engl J Med 349 546 553 12904519 10.1056/NEJMoa012782
2. T Kim AE Giuliano GH Lyman 2006 Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis Cancer. 106 4 16 16329134 10.1002/cncr.21568
3. G Cserni D Gregori F Merletti, et al. 2004 Meta-analysis of non-sentinel node metastases associated with micrometastatic sentinel nodes in breast cancer Br J Surg 91 1245 1252 15376203 10.1002/bjs.4725 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2cvpsFehtQ%3D%3D
4. G Viale E Maiorano G Pruneri, et al. 2005 Predicting the risk for additional axillary metastases in patients with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy Ann Surg 241 319 325 15650643 10.1097/01.sla. 0000150255.30665.52
5. MH Leidenius JH Vironen MS Riihelä LA Krogerus TS Toivonen KA von Smitten, et al. 2005 The prevalence of non-sentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastases Eur J Surg Oncol 31 13 18 15642420 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.09.012 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2Fhs1KmsQ%3D%3D
6. C van Deurzen M de Boer E Monninkhof P Bult E van der Wall VC Tjan-Heijnen, et al. 2008 Non-sentinel lymph node metastases associated with isolated breast cancer cells in the sentinel node J Natl Cancer Inst 100 1574 1580 19001602 10.1093/jnci/djn343
7. K Van Zee D Manasseh J Bevilacqua, et al. 2003 A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy Ann Surg Oncol 10 1140 1151 14654469 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.015
8. RF Hwang S Krishnamurthy KK Hunt, et al. 2003 Clinicopathologic factors predicting involvement of nonsentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 10 248 254 12679309 10.1245/ASO.2003.05.020
9. G Farshid M Pradhan J Kollias PG Gill 2004 A decision aid for predicting non-sentinel node involvement in women with breast cancer and at least one positive sentinel node Breast. 13 494 501 15563857 10.1016/j.breast.2004.08.005
10. RF Saidi PS Dudrick SG Remine VK Mittal 2004 Nonsentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer Am Surg 70 101 105 15011910 discussion 105
11. E Barranger C Coutant A Flahault Y Delpech E Darai S Uzan 2005 An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node involvement Breast Cancer Res Treat 91 113 119 15868438 10.1007/s10549-004-5781-z
12. AC Degnim C Reynolds G Pantvaidya, et al. 2005 Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram Am J Surg 190 543 550 16164917 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.008
13. AB Chagpar CR Scoggins RC Martin, et al. 2006 Prediction of sentinel lymph node-only disease in women with invasive breast cancer Am J Surg 192 882 887 17161113 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.063
14. A Pal E Provenzano S Duffy S Pinder A Purushotham 2008 A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive Br J Surg 95 302 309 17876750 10.1002/bjs.5943 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7islSgtw%3D%3D
15. G Houvenaeghel C Nos S Giard, et al. 2009 A nomogram predictive of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a sentinel lymph node micrometastasis Eur J Surg Oncol 35 690 695 19046847 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.10.003 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mzmtlajtg%3D%3D
16. H Kohrt R Olshen H Bermas, et al. 2008 New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients BMC Cancer 8 66 18315887 10.1186/1471-2407-8-66
17. J Cho W Han JW Lee, et al. 2008 A scoring system to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a comparison with other scoring systems Ann Surg Oncol 15 2278 2286 18528729 10.1245/s10434-008-9993-z
18. AS Gur B Unal U Ozbek, et al. 2010 Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the non-sentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study Eur J Surg Oncol 36 30 35 19535217 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.05.007 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c%2FotFWqsQ%3D%3D
19. A Perhavec MP Perme M Hocevar N Besic J Zgajnar 2010 Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node Breast Cancer Res Treat 119 357 366 19787449 10.1007/s10549-009-0561-4
20. O Coufal T Pavlík P Fabian, et al. 2009 Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population? Pathol Oncol Res. 15 733 740 19440855 10.1007/s12253-009-9177-6
21. C Coutant C Olivier E Lambaudie, et al. 2009 Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study J Clin Oncol 27 2800 2808 19349546 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7418
22. K Bilimoria D Bentrem N Hansen, et al. 2009 Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer J Clin Oncol 27 2946 2953 19364968 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5750
23. AE Giuliano L McCall P Beitsch, et al. 2010 Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial Ann Surg 252 426 432 20739842 discussion 432-423
24. AE Giuliano KK Hunt KV Ballman, et al. 2011 Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial JAMA. 305 569 575 21304082 10.1001/jama.2011.90 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhvVymtrg%3D
25. BJ van Wely S Teerenstra DA Schinagl TJ Aufenacker JH de Wilt LJ Strobbe 2011 Systematic review of the effect of external beam radiation therapy to the breast on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy Br J Surg 98 326 333 21254004 10.1002/bjs.7360
26. TJ Meretoja MH Leidenius PS Heikkila H Joensuu 2009 Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients with large or multifocal tumors Ann Surg Oncol 16 1148 1155 19242761 10.1245/s10434-009-0397-5
27. Christiansen P, Friis E, Balslev E, Jensen D, Møller S; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: five years experience from Denmark. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:561-8.
28. MH Leidenius LA Krogerus TS Toivonen KA von Smitten 2005 Sentinel node biopsy is not sensible in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours Eur J Surg Oncol 31 364 368 15837040 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.11.006 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2M3gt1Kqsg%3D%3D
29. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th ed. New-York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.
30. CL Carter C Allen DE Henson 1989 Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases Cancer. 63 181 187 2910416 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FovFCqug%3D%3D
31. AA Andea D Bouwman T Wallis DW Visscher 2004 Correlation of tumor volume and surface area with lymph node status in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma Cancer. 100 20 27 14692020 10.1002/cncr.11880
32. J Zgajnar N Besic M Podkrajsek K Hertl S Frkovic-Grazio M Hocevar 2005 Minimal risk of macrometastases in the non-sentinel axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes and preoperatively ultrasonically uninvolved axillary lymph nodes Eur J Cancer 41 244 248 15661549 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.004
33. C Coutant R Rouzier E Fondrinier, et al. 2009 Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study Breast Cancer Res Treat 113 537 543 18340527 10.1007/s10549-008-9967-7
34. Y Moghaddam M Falzon L Fulford NR Williams MR Keshtgar 2010 Comparison of three mathematical models for predicting the risk of additional axillary nodal metastases after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer Br J Surg 97 1646 1652 20641049 10.1002/bjs.7181 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfmsVGnsg%3D%3D
35. S Hidar I Harrabi L Benregaya, et al. 2011 Validation of nomograms to predict the risk of non-sentinels lymph node metastases in North African Tunisian breast cancer patients with sentinel node involvement Breast. 20 26 30 20729084 10.1016/j.breast.2010.07.006
36. S Alran Y De Rycke V Fourchotte, et al. 2007 Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy Ann Surg Oncol 14 2195 2201 17294071 10.1245/s10434-006-9331-2
37. NK Soni HL Carmalt DJ Gillett AJ Spillane 2005 Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity Eur J Surg Oncol 31 958 964 15979270 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.04.011 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2Mrpt1Onug%3D%3D