Estimation of real-time crash risk: Are all freeways created equal?

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2237, 2011, Pages 60-66

  Pande, Anurag ^a   Das, Abhishek ^b   Abdel Aty, Mohamed ^c   Hassan, Hany ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

^c University of Central Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); RISK PERCEPTION; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

CRASH RISK; FLORIDA; GROUND LOOP; LOOP DETECTOR; ORLANDO; RADAR DETECTORS; REAL-TIME CRASH RISKS; REALTIME TRAFFIC; TRAFFIC DATA; TRAFFIC VARIABLES;

DECISION TREES;

ACCIDENTS; CLASSIFICATION; DETECTORS; FORESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROADS;

EID: 84856645139     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2237-07     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Golob, T., and W. Recker. A Method for Relating Type of Crash to Traffic Flow Characteristics on Urban Freeways. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2004, pp. 53-80. (Pubitemid 37554437)
2. Pande, A., and M. Abdel-Aty. Comprehensive Analysis of Relationship Between Real-Time Traffic Surveillance Data and Rear-End Crashes on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1953, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 31-40. (Pubitemid 44877602)
3. Abdel-Aty, M. A., A. Pande, A. Das, and W. J. Knibbe. Assessing Safety on Dutch Freeways with Data from Infrastructure-Based Intelligent Transportation Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 153-161.
4. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Machine Learning, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2001, pp. 5-32.
5. Pande, A., and M. A. Abdel-Aty. Assessment of Freeway Traffic Parameters Leading to Lane-Change Related Collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2006, pp. 936-948. (Pubitemid 44015630)
6. Liaw, A., and M. Wiener. Classification and Regression by Random Forest. R News: Newsletter of the R Project, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2002, pp. 18-22. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/RNews/RNews-2002-3.pdf.
7. Archer, K. J., and R. V. Kimes. Empirical Characterization of Random Forest Variable Importance Measures. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2007, pp. 2249-2260.
8. Rumelhart, D. E., G. Hinton, and R. Williams. Learning Internal Representation by Error Propagation, Parallel Distributed. In Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 1: Foundations (D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986, pp. 318-362.
9. Wilamowski, B. M., S. Iplikci, O. Kaynak, and M. O. Efe. An Algorithm for Fast Convergence in Training Neural Networks. Proc., International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, D.C., 2001.
10. Ha, K., S. Cho, and D. Maclachlan. Response Models Based on Bagging Neural Networks. Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2005, pp. 17-30. (Pubitemid 40300694)
11. Lunetta, K. L., L. B. Hayward, J. Segal, and P. V. Eerdewegh. Screening Large-Scale Association Data: Exploiting Interactions Using Random Forests. BMC Genetics, Vol. 5, No. 32, 2004. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-5-32. (Pubitemid 41363871)