Measuring cumulative effects in a fragmented landscape

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 228, Issue , 2012, Pages 89-95

  Nogueira Terra, Talita ^a   Ferreira dos Santos, Rozely ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Environmental impact; Land use changes; Landscape

Indexed keywords

CHRONOSEQUENCES; CUMULATIVE EFFECTS; FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPES; HUMAN ACTIONS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; LAND USE CHANGES; LANDSCAPE; LANDSCAPE UNITS; PAST AND PRESENT; STUDY AREAS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ECOLOGY;

CHRONOSEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FRAGMENTATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84856637235     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bell S. The Potential of Applied Landscape Ecology to Forest Design Planning 2003, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
2. Birch C.P.D., Oom S.P., Beecham J.A. Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecological Modelling 2007, 206:347-359.
3. Coelho, M.C.N., 2001. Impactos ambientais em áreas urbanas. In: Antônio José Teixeira Guerra and Sandra Baptista da Cunha. (Org.). Impactos Ambientais Urbanos no Brasil. 1st ed. Bertrand Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 19-45.
4. ENVI Guia do Envi 3.5 2001, SulSoft Serviços de Processamento de Dados Ltd., Porto Alegre.
5. Gaucherel C., Houet T. Preface to the selected papers on spatially explicit landscape modelling: current practices and challenges. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:3477-3480.
6. Halpern S.B., McLeod K.L., Rosenberg A.A., Crowder L.B. Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning. Ocean and Coastal Management 2008, 51:203-211.
7. Hegmann, G., Cocklin, C., Creasey, R., Dupuis, S., Kennedy, A., Kingsley, L., Ross, W., Spaling, H., Stalker, D., 1999. Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide. Hull, Quebec: Prepared by the CEA Working Group and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd. for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
8. Keane, R.E., et al., 1996. Simulating coarse scale vegetation dynamics using Columbia River Basin Sucession Model - CRBSUM. General Technical Report INT-GTR-340. US Department of Agriculture, Forest service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT, p.50.
9. Keane R.E., Parsons R., Hessburg P. Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach. Ecological Modelling 2002, 151:29-49.
10. NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Environmental Policy Act 1997, Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President, U.S., Government, Washington, DC.
11. Rempel R., Carr A., Elkie P. Patch Analyst 2.2 1998, http://flash.lakeheadu.ca/~rempel/patch/download.html.
12. Schoorl J.M., Veldkamp A. Linking land use and landscape process modelling: a case study for the álora region (South Spain). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2001, 85:281-292.
13. Shifley S.R., Thompson F.R., Dijak W.D., Fan Z. Forecasting landscape-scale, cumulative effects of forest management on vegetation and wildlife habitat: a case study of issues, limitations, and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 254:474-483.
14. Yang Z., Khangaonkar T., Calvi M., Nelson K. Simulation of cumulative effects of nearshore restoration projects on estuarine hydrodynamics. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:969-977.