Prioritizing locations for the riparian establishment based on spatiotemporal change of riparian forest area at a watershed scale

Paddy and Water Environment

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 49-58

  Song, Inhong ^a   Kim, Ik Jae ^b   Han, Dae Ho ^b   Byeon, Myeong Seop ^c   Lee, Jae Kwan ^c   Kang, Moon Seong ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Environment Institute (KEI)   (South Korea)

^c National Institute for Environmental Research   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Land cover analysis; Prioritization; Riparian area establishment; Riparian forest; Riparian index

Indexed keywords

LAND COVER ANALYSIS; PRIORITIZATION; RIPARIAN AREAS; RIPARIAN FORESTS; RIPARIAN INDEX;

ECOSYSTEMS; WATERSHEDS; WETLANDS;

FORESTRY;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTS; GOVERNMENTS; LAND USE; WATER SHEDS; WETLANDS;

EID: 84856632880     PISSN: 16112490     EISSN: 16112504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-011-0264-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alexander RB, Boyer EW, Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Moore RB (2007) The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. J Am Water Resour Assoc (JAWRA) 43(1): 41-59.
2. Bentrup G (2008) Conservation buffers: design guidelines for buffers, corridors and greenways. USDA Forest Service southern research station, Asheville, North Carolina. Technical Report SRS-109.
3. Claggett PR, Okay JA, Stehman SV (2010) Monitoring regional riparian forest cover change using stratified sampling and multiresolution imagery. J Am Water Resour As (JAWRA) 46(2): 334-343.
4. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41: 540-551.
5. Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EBD III (1998) Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14843-14847.
6. Hawes E, Smith M (2005) Riparian buffer zones: functions and recommended widths, Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Study Committee.
7. KMA (2008) Korea meteorological administration weather data from 1971 to 2007. http://www. kma. go. kr/.
8. Knighton D (1998) Fluvial forms and processes: a new perspective. Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Korean Ministry of Environment (2007) A plan of stream ecological restoration project for the coming 10 years ('06-'15).
10. Lowrance R, Altier LS, Newbold JD, Schnabel RR, Groffman PM, Denver JM, Correll DL, Gilliam JW, Robinson JL, Brinsfield RB, Staver KW, Lucas W, Todd AH (1997) Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake bay watersheds. Environ Manage 21(5): 687-712.
11. Naiman RJ, De′camps H, Pollock M (1993) The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl 3(2): 209-212.
12. Parkyn S (2004) Review of riparian buffer zone effectiveness, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry technical paper No. 2004/05, Wellington, New Zealand.
13. Randir TO, O'Connor R, Penner PR, Goodwin DW (2001) A watershed-based land prioritization model for water supply protection. For Ecol Manag 143: 47-56.
14. Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2003) Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for Amphibians and Reptiles. Conserv Biol 17: 1219-1228.
15. Tomer MD, Dosskey MG, Burkart MR, James DE, Helmers MJ, Eisenhauer DE (2009) Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality. Agroforest Syst 75: 17-25.
16. USDA Forest Service (1998) Chesapeake Bay riparian handbook: a guide for establishing and maintaining riparian forest buffers. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, PA.
17. Wenger S (1999) A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent, and vegetation. Publication of the Office of Public Service and Outreach, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
18. Zhang L, Wang GQ, Dai BX, Li TJ (2007) Classification and codification methods of stream networks in a river basin: a review. Environ Inform Arch 5: 364-372.