Exploration of location influences on firm survival rates with parametric duration models

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2245, 2011, Pages 124-130

  Manzato, Gustavo G ^a   Arentze, Theo A ^a   Timmermans, Harry J P ^a   Ettema, Dick ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

DATA SET; DURATION MODELLING; ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES; ECONOMIC ASPECTS; ECONOMIC RENT; FIRM SURVIVAL; LOCATION INFLUENCES; REGIONAL ECONOMIC; REGIONAL EFFECTS; SURVIVAL RATE;

LOCATION;

EID: 84856630001     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2245-15     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abraham, J. H., and J. D. Hunt. Firm Location in the MEPLAN Model of Sacramento. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1685, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 187-198. (Pubitemid 30568785)
2. Bliemer, M. C. J., and M. De Bok. Infrastructure and Firm Dynamics: Calibration of a Micro Simulation Model for Firms in the Netherlands. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 132-144. (Pubitemid 46479326)
3. De Bok, M., and F. Sanders. Firm Location and the Accessibility of Locations: Empirical Results from the Netherlands. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1902, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 35-43. (Pubitemid 41663953)
4. Edwards, L. Toward a Process Model of Office-Location Decision Making. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 15, No. 10, 1983, pp. 1327-1342.
5. Elgar, I., and E. J. Miller. Conceptual Model of Location of Small Office Firms. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 190-196. (Pubitemid 46479332)
6. Elgar, I., and E. J. Miller. Office Location Decisions: Analysis of the Results of SOLD. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
7. Elgar, I., B. Farooq, and E. J. Miller. Modeling Location Decisions of Office Firms: Introducing Anchor Points and Constructing Choice- Sets into the Model System. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
8. Khan, A. S., J. E. Abraham, and J. D. Hunt.ASystem for Microsimulating Business Establishments: Analysis, Design and Results. International Colloquium on the Behavioural Foundations of Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
9. Maoh, H. F., P. S. Kanaroglou, and R. N. Buliung. Modelling the Location of Firms within an Integrated Transport and Land-use Modelfor Hamilton, Ontario. International Colloquium on the Behavioural Foundations of Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 2002.
10. Moeckel, R. Simulation of Firms as a Planning Support System to Limit Urban Sprawl of Jobs. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2009, pp. 883-905.
11. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ullfarsson. Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43-67.
12. Van Wissen, L. J. G. A Micro-Simulation Model of Firms: Applications of Concepts of Demography of the Firm. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 79, No. 2, 2000, pp. 111-134.
13. Manzato, G. G., T. A. Arentze, H. J. P. Timmermans, and D. Ettema. Location and Accessibility Mediated Influences on Office Firm Closure Rates: A Proportional Hazard Model. International Journal of Urban Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-15.
14. Audretsch, D. B., and T. Mahmood. New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, No. 1, 1995, pp. 97-103. (Pubitemid 26429325)
15. Perez, S. E., A. S. Llopis, and J. A. S. Llopis. The Determinants of Survival of Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2004, pp. 251-273.
16. Görg, H., and E. Strobl. Multinational Companies, Technology Spillovers and Firm Survival: Evidence from Irish Manufacturing. Research paper. Centre for Research on Globalization and Labour Markets, 2000. www.gep.org.uk/shared/shared-levpublications/Research-Papers/2000/00-12.pdf.
17. Fotopoulos, G., and H. Louri. Location and Survival of New Entry. Small Business Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2000, pp. 311-321.
18. Stearns, T. M., N. M. Carter, P. D. Reynolds, and M. L. Williams. New Firm Survival: Industry, Strategy, and Location. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1995, pp. 23-42.
19. Kleinbaum, D. G., and M. Klein. Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text. Springer, New York, 2005.
20. Kiefer, N. M. Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1988, pp. 646-679.
21. Allison, P. D. Event History Analysis. In Handbook of Data Analysis (A. E. Bryman and M. Hardy, eds.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2004, pp. 369-386.
22. Collett, D. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, London, 1994.
23. Hosmer, D. W., Jr., and S. Lemeshow. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. Wiley&Sons Inc.,NewYork, 1999.
24. Norušis, M. J. SPSS 16.0 Advanced Statistical Procedures Companion. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2008.
25. Smith, P. J. Analysis of Failure and Survival Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2002.
26. Vittinghoff, E., D. V. Glidden, S. C. Shiboski, and C. E. McCulloch. Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. Springer, New York, 2005