How many independent rice vocabularies in Asia?

Rice

Volumn 4, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 121-133

  Sagart, Laurent ^a  

^a CRLAO   (France)

Author keywords

Asia; Domestication; Linguistics; Rice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856621540     PISSN: 19398425     EISSN: 19398433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12284-011-9077-8     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adelaar A. Towards an integrated theory about the Indonesian migrations to Madagascar. In: Peregrine PN, Peiros I, Feldman M, editors. Ancient human migrations: a multidisciplinary approach. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2009. p. 149-72.
2. Anderson GDS. Advances in Proto-Munda reconstruction. Mon-Khmer Studies. 2004;34:159-84.
3. Bahuchet S. Languages of African rainforest « pygmy » huntergatherers: language shifts without cultural admixture. Paper presented at the conference on Historical linguistics and huntergatherers populations in global perspective, Leipzig: Germany, 10-12 August 2006. 2006. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00548207/en/.
4. Bellwood P. Examining the farming/language hypothesis in the East Asian context. In: Sagart L, Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A, editors. The peopling of East Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon; 2005a. p. 17-30.
5. Bellwood P. First farmers: the origin of agricultural societies. London: Blackwell; 2005b.
6. Benedict PK. Sino-Tibetan: a Conspectus. Cambridge: University Printing House; 1972.
7. Blench R. If agriculture cannot be reconstructed for proto-Sinotibetan what are the consequences? Paper presented at the 42nd Conference on Sino-Tibetan Language and Linguistics, and subsequently revised, Chiang Mai, November 2-4, 2009. 2009 http://www.rogerblench.info/Language%20data/Sino-Tibetan/Blench%20ICSTLL42%20Chiang%20Mai%20paper.pdf.
8. Blench R and Post M. Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of Northeast Indian languages. Paper from the 16th Himalayan Languages Symposium, 2-5 September 2010, School of Oriental and African Studies, London; 2010.
9. Blust R. Beyond the Austronesian homeland: the Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. In: Goodenough WH, editor. Prehistoric settlement of the Pacific. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society; 1998.
10. Brace L, Nagai T. Japanese tooth size: past and present. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982;59:399-411.
11. Bradley D. Proto-Loloish. Scandinavian Institute Monograph series N° 39. London: Curzon; 1979.
12. Bray F. Agriculture. In: Needham J, Needham J, editors. Science and civilization in China, vol. 6 part 2, vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
13. Burrow T. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon; 1984.
14. Cauquelin J. Dictionnaire puyuma-français. Paris: Ecole Française d'Extrême-Orient; 1991.
15. Chang KC. Shang civilization. Newhaven: Yale University Press; 1980.
16. Coblin S. A sinologist's handlist of Sino-Tibetan lexical comparisons. In: Malek R, editor. Monumenta Serica Monograph Series XVIII. Nettetal: Steyler Verlag; 1986. 186 p.
17. Diffloth G. The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austroasiatic. In: Sagart L, Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A, editors. The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: RoutledgeCurzon; 2005. p. 77-89.
18. Donegan P, Stampe D. Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2004. p. 3-36.
19. Ferlus M. The Austroasiatic vocabulary for rice: its origin and expansion. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. 2010;3 (2):61-76.
20. Ferrell R. Paiwan dictionary. Pacific Linguistics C73. Canberra: A.N. U.; 1982.
21. Fogg WH. Swidden cultivation of foxtail millet by Taiwan aborigines: a cultural analogue of the domestication of Setaria italica in China. In: Keightley D, editor. The origins of Chinese civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1983.
22. Fuller DQ, Harvey E, Qin L. Presumed domestication? Evidence for wild rice cultivation and domestication in the fifth millennium BC of the Lower Yangtze region. Antiquity. 2007;81(2007):316-31.
23. Fuller DQ, Qin L. Evidence for a late onset of agriculture in the Lower Yangtze region and challenges for an archaeobotany of rice. In: Sanchez-Mazas A, Blench R, Ross M, Peyros I, Lin M, editors. Past human migrations in East Asia. Routledge studies in the Early History of East Asia. London: Routledge; 2008. p 40-83
24. Garris AJ, Tai TH, Coburn J, Kresovich S, McCouch S. Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L. Genetics. 2005;169 (3):1631-8.
25. Glover I, Higham C. New evidence for early rice cultivation in South, Southeast and East Asia. In: Harris D, editor. The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1996. p. 413-41.
26. Han KX, Nakahashi T. A comparative study of ritual tooth ablation in Ancient China and Japan. Anthropol Sci. 1996;104(1):43-64.
27. Haudricourt AG, Strecker D. Hmong-Mien (Miao-Yao) loans in Chinese. T'oung Pao. 1991; 77, 4-5, pp. 335-342.
28. Higham C. Languages and farming dispersals: Austroasiatic languages and rice cultivation. In: Bellwood P, Renfrew C, editors. Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute; 2002. p. 223-32.
29. Higham C. East Asian agriculture and its impact. In: Scarrre C, editor. The human past. 2nd ed. London: Thames and Hudson; 2009. p. 234-63.
30. Ino Y. Dong Ying You Ji. In: Moriguchi T, editor. Ino Yoshinori Fanyu Diaocha Shouce. Taipei: Southern Materials Center; 1998. p. 205-25.
31. Joseph UV, Burling R. The comparative phonology of the Boro Garo languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages; 2006.
32. Kovach MJ, Sweeney MT, McCouch SR. New insights into the history of rice domestication. Trends Genet. 2007;23(11):578-87.
33. Krishnamurti B. The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press; 2003.
34. Kuiper FBJ. Proto-Munda words in Sanskrit. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij; 1948.
35. Kuiper FBJ. An Austro-Asiatic myth in the RV. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij; 1950.
36. Li H-L. The domestication of plants in China: ecogeographical considerations. In: Keightley DN, editor. The origins of Chinese civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1983. p. 21-64.
37. Li X, Dodson J, Zhou XY, Zhang HB, Matsumoto R. Early cultivated wheat and broadening of agriculture in Neolithic China. Holocene. 2007;2007(17):555-60.
38. Londo JP, Chiang Y-C, Hung K-H, Chiang T-Y, Schaal BA. Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, June 20, 2006. 2006;103(25): 9578-9583.
39. Ostapirat W. Proto-Kra. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area. 2000;23(1):1-251.
40. Ostapirat W. Tai-Kadai and Austronesian: notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. In: Sagart L, Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A, editors. The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: Routledge Curzon; 2005. p. 109-33.
41. Pietrusewsky M, Lauer A, Tsang C-H. Health status and lifestyle in early neolithic and iron age Taiwan. Slide show presented at the conference on Pacific Island Archaeology in the 21st century: relevance and engagement, Koror, Republic of Palau, July 1-3, 2009. 2009. http://www.anthropology.hawaii.edu/People/Faculty/Pietrusewsky/pdfs/PalauPPT_for%20website.pdf.
42. Pittayaporn P. The phonology of proto-Tai. Unpublished Cornell University dissertation; 2009
43. Pourrias L, Poinsot M. Dictionnaire 'amis français. Privately published; 2011
44. Ratliff M. Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics; 2010.
45. Reid LA. Morphological evidence for Austric. Oceanic Linguistics. 1994;33(2):323-44.
46. Reid LA. The current status of Austric. A review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence. In: Sagart L, Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A, editors. The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: Routledge Curzon; 2005. p. 134-60.
47. Reid LA. Another look at the language of the Tasaday. Keynote lecture presented to the 3rd Annual Conference of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society (SEALS III), Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 10-17, 1993.
48. Robbeets M. Is Japanese related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? (Turcologica 64). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz; 2005.
49. Sagart L. Some remarks on the Ancestry of Chinese. In: Wang WS-Y, editor. The ancestry of the Chinese language. J Chin Ling. 1995a; monograph series no. 8, pp. 195-223.
50. Sagart L. Chinese 'buy' and 'sell' and the direction of borrowings between Chinese and Miao-Yao. T'oung Pao LXXXI. 1995;4-5:328-42.
51. Sagart L. The vocabulary of cereal cultivation and the phylogeny of East Asian languages. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 23. 2003;1:127-36. Taipei papers.
52. Sagart L. The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai. Oceanic Linguistics. 2004;43(2):411-444.
53. Sagart L. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: an updated and improved argument. In: Sagart L, Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A, editors. The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: RoutledgeCurzon; 2005. p. 161-76.
54. Sagart L. 2006. Review: James A. Matisoff (2003) Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. System and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman Reconstruction. Diachronica XXII, 206-223.
55. Sagart L. 2008. The expansion of Setaria farmers in East Asia: a linguistic and archaeological model. In: Sanchez-Mazas A, Blench R, Ross M, Peiros I, Lin M, editors. Past human migrations in East Asia: matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 133-157. Routledge studies in the Early History of Asia, London: Routledge. http://anthro.unige.ch/~sanchez-mazas/phm/14SAGART_CHAP05-OK.pdf.
56. Sagart L. The Austroasiatics: east to west or west to east? In: Enfield NJ, editor. Dynamics of human diversity: the case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics; 2011. p. 345-59.
57. Schmidt W. Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentralasiens und Austronesiens. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn; 1906.
58. Shorto H, Sidwell P, Cooper D, Bauer C, editors. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. Sidwell Canberra: Australian National University. Pacific Linguistics 579; 2006.
59. Sidwell P. Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: history and state of the art. Lincom Europa: Munich; 2009.
60. Starostin SA. Altaic loans in Old Chinese. In: Sanchez-Mazas A, Blench R, Ross M, Peiros I, Lin M, editors. Past human migrations in East Asia: matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: Routledge Studies in the Early History of Asia; 2008. p. 254-62.
61. Starostin SA, Dybo A, Mudrak O. Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages. Leiden: Brill; 2003.
62. Tsang C-H. Recent discoveries at a Tapenkeng culture site in Taiwan: implications for the problem of Austronesian origins. In: Sagart L, Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A, editors. The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: RoutledgeCurzon; 2005.
63. Tsuchida, S. 1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology. Tokyo: Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa monograph series N° 5.
64. Unger JM. The role of contact in the origins of the Japanese and Korean Languages. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press; 2008. p. 2008.
65. van Driem G. A new theory on the origin of Chinese. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin. 1999;18(2):43-58.
66. van Driem G. 2009. Rice and the Austroasiatic and Hmong-Mien homelands. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics, Mahidol University, 29 October 2009.
67. Vovin A. Is Japanese related to Austronesian? Oceanic Linguistics. 1994;33(2):269-390.
68. Wang TY (1989). Buckwheat germplasm resources in Tibet. In: Buck wheat Research Association in China, editor. A collection of scientific treatises on buckwheat in China, 49-51. Scientific Publisher, Beijing (in Chinese).
69. Wang F, Mao Z. Miao-yao yu guyin gouni [a reconstruction of the sound system of Proto-Miao-Yao]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue; 1995.
70. Whitman JB. The relationship between Japanese and Korean. In: Tranter, David N, editors. The Languages of Japan and Korea. London: Routledge; 2011
71. Whitman JB. The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. PhD thesis, Harvard University; 1985.
72. Witzel M. Early sources for South Asian substrate languages. Mother Tongue special issue, Oct 1999; 1999.
73. Witzel M. The languages of Harappa. 2000. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~Witzel/IndusLang.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2011.
74. Wolff JU. Proto-Austronesian phonology with glossary, vol. 2. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications; 2010.
75. Zide A and Zide N. Proto-Munda cultural vocabulary: evidence for early agriculture. In: Philip Jenner, Laurence Thompson, Stanley Starosta, editors. Austroasiatic studies part II. 1976; 1295-334.