Old-forest species: The importance of specific substrata vs. stand continuity in the case of calicioid fungi

Silva Fennica

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1015-1039

  Lõhmus, Asko ^a   Lõhmus, Piret ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Conservation; Continuity; Forest management; Habitat; Lichen; Limiting factor; Structural diversity

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FUNGI; LARGE DATASET; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

CONTINUITY; HABITAT; LICHEN; LIMITING FACTOR; STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY;

FORESTRY;

ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DATA SET; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNGUS; HABITAT TYPE; LICHEN; LIMITING FACTOR; MICROCLIMATE; MICROHABITAT; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; SNAG; SPECIES RICHNESS; SUBSTRATE;

CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; FUNGI; LICHENS;

ESTONIA;

FUNGI;

EID: 84856620063     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.84     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Areskoug, V. & Thor, G. 2005. Distribution, status and ecology of the lichen Cyphelium notarisii in Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici 42: 317-326.
2. Ekman, S., Froberg, L., Karnefelt, I., Sundin, R. & Thor, G. 1989. New or inetersting lichens from Estonia. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 28: 5-25.
3. Hallingback, T. 2007. Working with Swedish cryptogam conservation. Biological Conservation 135: 311-314.
4. Juriado, I., Liira, J., Paal, J. & Suija, A. 2009. Tree and stand level variables influencing diversity of lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees in boreo-nemoral floodplain forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 105-125.
5. Leppik, E. & Juriado, I. 2008. Factors important for epiphytic lichen communities in wooded meadows of Estonia. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 44: 75-87.
6. Lohmus, A. & Kraut, A. 2010. Stand structure of hemiboreal old-growth forests: characteristic features, variation among site types, and a comparison with FSC-certified mature stands in Estonia. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 155-165.
7. Lohmus, A., Lohmus, P. & Vellak, K. 2007. Substratum diversity explains landscapescale co-variation in the species richness of bryophytes and lichens. Biological Conservation 135: 405-414. (Raw data).
8. Lohmus, P. 2003. Composition and substrata of forest lichens in Estonia: a metaanalysis. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 40: 19-38.
9. Lohmus, P. & Lohmus, A. 2001. Snags, and their lichen flora in old Estonian peatland forests. Annales Botanici Fennici 38: 265-280.
10. Lohmus, P., Turja, K. & Lohmus, A. 2010. Lichen communities on treefall mounds depend more on root-plate than stand characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 1754-1761.
11. Randlane, T. & Saag, A. (eds.) 2004. Eesti pisisamblikud. Tartu Ulikooli Kirjastus, Tartu. 582 p. (In Estonian).
12. Randlane, T., Juriado, I., Suija, A., Lohmus, P. & Leppik, E. 2008. Lichens in the new red list of Estonia. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 44: 113-120.
13. Standards and Petitions Working Group. 2006. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 6.1. Available at: http://app.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf.
14. Suija, A., Czarnota, P., Himelbrant, D., Kowalewska, A., Kukwa, M., Kuznetsova, E., Leppik, E., Motiejunaite, J., Piterans, A., Schiefelbein, U., Skazina, M., Sohrabi, M., Stepanchikova, I. & Veres, K. 2010. The lichen biota of three nature reserves in island Saaremaa, Estonia. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 47: 85-96.