Underlying agreements between quantitative and qualitative research: The short and tall of it all

Human Resource Development Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 381-398

  Newman, Isadore ^a   Hitchcock, John H ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

mixed methods; qualitative methods; quantitative methods; research design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856619659     PISSN: 15344843     EISSN: 15526712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534484311413867     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Bazeley P. (2003). Computerized data analysis for mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 385-422). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2. Becker H.S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 53-71). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Brantlinger E.,Jiminez R.,Klingner J.,Pugach M.,Richardson V.Qualitative studies in special education.Exceptional Children. 2005;71 (2): 195-207.
4. Callahan J.L.,Reio T.G.Making subjective judgments in quantitative studies: The importance of using effect sizes and confidence intervals.Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2006;17 (2): 159-173.
5. Campbell D.T.,Fiske D.W.Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin. 1959;56:81-105.
6. Christ T.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Teaching mixed methods and action research: Pedagogical, practical, and evaluative considerations. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 643-676). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:643-676.
7. Cohen J.The earth is round(p<.05).American Psychologist. 1994;49:997-1003.
8. Creswell J.W.Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2008:.
9. Creswell J.W.,Plano Clark V.Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011:.
10. Creswell J.W.,Tashakkori A.,Jensen K.D.,Shapley K.L. (2003). Teaching mixed methods research: Practices, dilemmas, and challenges. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 619-637). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11. DarlingtonR. B. (2002). Factor analysis. Retrieved from http://www.psych.cornell.edu/Darlington/factor.htm.
12. Denzin N.K.,Lincoln Y.S.The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N.K.Lincoln Y.S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005:1-32.
13. Fraas J.W.,Newman I.Testing for statistical and practical significance: A one-step procedure. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association; Chicago, IL 2000
14. Gall M.D.,Gall J.P.,Borg W.R.Educational research: An introduction. 2006). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006:.
15. Guba E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E.G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-27). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
16. Guest G.,Bunce A.,Johnson L.How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability.Field Methods. 2006;18 (1): 59-82.
17. Hitchcock J.H.,Nastasi B.K.,Dai D.,Newman J.,Jayasena A.,Bernstein-Moore R.Varjas K.Illustrating a mixed-method approach for validating culturally specific constructs.Journal of School Psychology. 2005;43:259-278.
18. Hong G.,Raudenbush S.W.Effects of kindergarten retention policy on children's cognitive growth in reading and mathematics.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2005;27 (3): 205-224.
19. Horner R.H.,Carr E.G.,Halle J.,McGee G.,Odom S.,Wolery M.The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education.Exceptional Children. 2005;71 (2): 165-179.
20. Howe K.R.Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatability thesis, or, dogmas die hard.Educational Researcher. 1988;17:10-16.
21. Huck S.W.Statistical misconceptions. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2009:.
22. Johnson B.,Christensen L.Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. 2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:.
23. Johnson R.B.,Onwuegbuzie A.J.Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.Educational Researcher. 2004;33 (7): 14-26.
24. Kline P.An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge; 1994:.
25. Kline R.B.Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004:.
26. Kratochwill T.R.Levin J.R.Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992:.
27. Maxwell J.A.Using qualitative methods for causal explanation.Field Methods. 2004;16 (3): 243-264.
28. Messick S.Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.American Psychologist. 1995;50:741-749.
29. Morgan P.L.Null hypothesis significance testing: Philosophical & practical considerations of a statistical controversy.Exceptionality. 2003;11 (4): 209-221.
30. Nastasi B.K.,Hitchcock J.H.,Brown L.M.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: Moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 305-338). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:305-338.
31. Nastasi B.K.,Hitchcock J.H.,Burkholder G.,Varjas K.,Sarkar S.,Jayasena A.Assessing adolescents' understanding of and reactions to stress in different cultures: A mixed-method approach.School Psychology International. 2007;28 (2): 163-178.
32. Nastasi B.K.,Schensul S.L.Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research.Journal of School Psychology. 2005;42:177-195.
33. Newman I.,Benz C.R.Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 1998:.
34. Newman I.,Fraas J.W.,Herbert A. (2001). Testing non-nil null hypotheses with t tests of group means: A Monte Carlo study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago.
35. Newman I.,Ramlo S.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 505-530). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:505-530.
36. Onwuegbuzie A.J.Positivists, post-positivists, post-structuralists, and post-modernists: Why can't we all get along? Towards a framework for unifying research paradigms.Education. 2002;122 (3): 518-530.
37. Onwuegbuzie A.J.,Leech N.L.A call for qualitative power analyses.Quality and Quantity. 2007;41 (1): 105-121.
38. Onwuegbuzie A.J.,Teddlie C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39. Patton M.Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2002:.
40. Reio T.G.The ongoing quest for theory-building research methods articles.Human Resource Development Review. 2010;9 (3): 223-225.
41. Ridenour C.S.,Newman I.Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008:.
42. Rosenthal R.,Rosnow R.L.,Rubin D.B.Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.
43. Schensul S.,Schensul J.,LeCompte M.Essential ethnographic methods. Palo Alto, CA: AltaMira; 1999:.
44. Schmidt F.L.,Hunter J.E. (1997). Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data. In L.L. Harlow, S. A. Muliak, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 37-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Shadish W.R.,Cook T.,Campbell D.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002:.
46. Smith J.K.Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue.Educational Researcher. 1983;12:6-13.
47. Smith J.K.The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1984;6:379-391.
48. Smith J.K.,Hodkinson P.The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2005). Relativism, criteria and politics. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.Denzin N.Lincoln Y., ed. London: SAGE; 2005:.
49. Stake R.E.The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Denzin N.K.Lincoln Y.S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005:443-466.
50. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:.
51. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:.
52. Thompson B.Statistical significance testing and effect size reporting: Portrait of a possible future.Research in the Schools. 1998;5 (2): 33-38.
53. Thompson B."Statistical," "practical," and "clinical": How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider?.Journal of Counseling and Development. 2002a;80:64-71.
54. Thompson B.What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes.Educational Researcher. 2002b;31 (3): 24-31.
55. Thompson B.Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004:.
56. Wilkinson L.Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.American Psychologist. 1999;54:594-604.
57. WoodP. (2010). Anthropology Association rejecting science?The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/innovations/anthropology-association-rejecting-science/27936.