Mathematical programming representation of pull controlled single-product serial manufacturing systems

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-35

  Alfieri, Arianna ^a   Matta, Andrea ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Mathematical programming; Production systems; Pull control policies; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CONTROL POLICY; CONTROLLED SYSTEM; EVENT SEQUENCE; MANUFACTURING SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATIONS; NEW MODEL; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; PARAMETER VALUES; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODELS; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; PULL CONTROL; SERIAL MANUFACTURING; SIMULATION; SIMULATION MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; MANUFACTURE; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84856619073     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-009-0371-x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baccelli, F., Cohen, G., Olsder, G. J., & Quadrat, J. P. (1992). Synchronization and linearity: An algebra for discrete event systems. New York: Wiley.
2. Bonvik, A. M., Couch, C. E., & Gershwin, S. B. (1997). A comparison of production - line control mechanisms. International Journal of Production Research, 35(3), 789-804. (Pubitemid 127566649)
3. Buzacott, J. A., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (1993). Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4. Chan, W. K., & Schruben, L. W. (2003). Properties of discrete event systems from their mathematical programming representations. In S. Chick, P. J. Sanchez, D. Ferrin & D. J. Morrice (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003Winter SimulationConference (pp. 496-502). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
5. Chan, W.K., & Schruben, L. (2008).Optimizationmodels of discrete - event system dynamics. Operations Research, 56(5), 1218-1237.
6. Cottenceau, B., Hardouin, L., & Ouerghi, I. (2008). Kanban policy improvement thanks to a (max, +) - algebra analysis. International Journal of Systems Science, 39, 689-698.
7. Dallery, Y., & Liberopoulos, G. (2000). Extended kanban control system: Combining kanban and base stock. IIE Transactions, 32, 369-386. (Pubitemid 32210817)
8. Di Mascolo, M., Frein, Y., & Dallery, Y. (1996). An analytical method for performance evaluation of kanban controlled production systems. Operations Research, 44(1), 50-64. (Pubitemid 126669436)
9. Duri, C., Frein, Y., & Di Mascolo, M. (2000). Comparison among three pull control policies: Kanban, base stock, and generalized kanban. Annals of Operations Research, 93, 41-69.
10. Frein, Y., Di Mascolo, M., & Dallery, Y. (1995). On the design of generalized kanban control systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(9), 158-184. (Pubitemid 39032459)
11. Fu, M. (2002). Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. Journal on Computing, 14(3), 192-215.
12. Gallego, G., & Ozer, O. (2001). Integrating replenishment decisions with advance demand information. Management Science, 47(10), 1344-1360. (Pubitemid 34192845)
13. Gaury, E. G. A., Pierreval, H., & Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2000). An evolutionary approach to select a pull system among kanban, conwip and hybrid. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11, 157-167.
14. Geraghty, J., & Heavey, C. (2006). A review and comparison of hybrid and pull - type production control strategies. In G. Liberopoulos, C. T. Papadopoulos, B. Tan, J. MacGregor Smith, & S. B. Gershwin (Eds.), In Stochastic modeling of manufacturing systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
15. Hariharan, R., & Zipkin, P. (1995). Customer - order information, lead times and inventories. Management Science, 41, 1599-1607.
16. Karaesmen, F., Buzacott, J. A., & Dallery, Y. (2002). Integrating advance order information in production control. IIE Transactions, 34, 649-662. (Pubitemid 34515113)
17. Karaesmen, F., & Dallery, Y. (2000). A performance comparison of pull type control mechanisms for multi-stage manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 68, 59-71.
18. Karaesmen, F., Liberopoulos, G., & Dallery, Y. (2004). The value of advance demand information in production/inventory systems. Annals of Operations Research, 126, 135-157. (Pubitemid 39056543)
19. Karmarkar, N. (1984). A new polynomial time algorithm in linear programming. Combinatorica, 4, 373-395.
20. Klee, V., & Minty, G. (1972). How good is the simplex algorithm. In O. Shisha (Ed.), Inequalities-III (pp. 159-175). London: Academic Press.
21. Liberopoulos, G., & Dallery, Y. (2000). A unified framework for pull control mechanisms in multi-stage manufacturing systems. Annals of Operations Research, 93, 325-355.
22. Matta, A., & Chefson, R. (2005). Formal properties of closed flow lines with limited buffer capacities and random processing times. In Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (pp. 190-194). Porto, Portugal.
23. Matta, A., Dallery, Y., & Di Mascolo, M. (2005). Analysis of assembly systems controlled with kanbans. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 310-336. (Pubitemid 40219793)
24. Ozer, O., & Wei, W. (2004). Inventory control with limited capacity and advance demand information. Operations Research, 52, 998-1000.
25. Qi, E., & Li, S. (1995). A deds model for a serial pull system and an analysis of material movements. International Journal of Operations, 15(9), 70-88. (Pubitemid 39032454)
26. Schruben, L. W. (2000). Mathematical programming models of discrete event system dynamics. In J. A. Joines, R. R. Bartona, K. Kang, & P. A. Fishwick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 381-385). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
27. Vanderbei, R. J. (2001). Linear programming. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Wijngaard, J., & Karaesmen, F. (2007). On the optimality of order base - stock policies in case of advance demand information in combination with a restricted capacity. OR Spectrum, 29, 643-660.