Post-publication review: Will it hold its ground

Lung India

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 94-

  Balhara, Yatan Pal Singh ^a  

^a LADY HARDINGE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; LETTER; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROBIOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION;

EID: 84856610854     PISSN: 09702113     EISSN: 0974598X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.92383     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Singh V. Let us all join hands in strengthening the publication process. Lung India 2011;28:237.
2. Rennie D, Flanagin A, Smith R, Smith J. Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: Call for Research. JAMA 2003;289:1438. (Pubitemid 37430315)
3. Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Davidoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database of Sytematic Reviews 2007;2:MR000016.
4. Revolutionizing peer review? Nat Neurosci 2005;8:397.
5. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Peer review in scientifc publications. Eighth Report of Session 2010-12, House of Commons London: The Stationery Offce Limited, London. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/856/856.pdf [Last accessed on 2011].