Land reform in Bolivia: The forestry question

Conservation and Society

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 274-285

  Pellegrini, Lorenzo ^a   Dasgupta, Anirban ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^b SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

agrarian reform; Bolivia; forest management; forest tenure; land reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856596519     PISSN: 09724923     EISSN: 09753133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.92139     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adams, M. 1995. Land reform: New seeds on old ground? Natural Resources Perspective 6. London: Overseas Development Institute.
2. Alston, L.J., G.D. Libecap and B. Muellere. 2000. Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(2): 162-188. (Pubitemid 30170385)
3. Ankersen, T.T. and T. Ruppert. 2006. Tierra y libertad: The social function doctrine and land reform in Latin America. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 19: 69-120.
4. Assies, W. 2006. Land tenure legislation in a pluri-cultural and multi-ethnic society: The case of Bolivia. Journal of Peasant Studies 33(4): 569-611.
5. Balogh, B. 2002. Scientific forestry and the roots of the modern American state: Gifford Pinchot's path to progressive reform. Environmental History 7(2): 198-225. (Pubitemid 34674539)
6. Banerjee, A. 1999: Land reform: Prospects and strategies. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper.
7. Benneker, C. 2008. Dealing with the state, market and NGOs: The impact of institutions on the constitution and performance of community forest enterprises (CFE) in the lowlands of Bolivia. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
8. Benneker, C., J. Bejarano and M.A.C. Villarroel. 2005. Experiencias de Manejo Forestal Comunitario en Bolivia. Santa Cruz, Bolivia, CEADES - SNV.
9. Bernstein, H. 2002. Land reform: Taking a long(er) view. Journal of Agrarian Change 2(4): 433-463. (Pubitemid 38615847)
10. Berry, A. and W.R. Cline. 1979. Agrarian structure and productivity in developing countries. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Berry, S. 2009: Building for the future? Investment, land reform and the contingencies of ownership in contemporary Ghana. World Development 37(8): 1370-1378.
12. Binswanger, H.P. 1991. Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon. World Development 19(7): 821-829.
13. Bolivia Forestal (BOLFOR). 2009. Dossier Forestal. Santa Cruz: BOLFOR.
14. Borras, S.M. 2006. Redistributive land reform in 'public' (forest) lands? Lessons from the Philippines and their implications for land reform theory and practice. Progress in Development Studies 6: 123-145.
15. Borras, S.M. 2003. Questioning market-led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 3(3): 367-394.
16. Borras, S.M. and T. McKinley. 2006. The unresolved land reform debate: Beyond state-led or market-led models. Brasilia: International Poverty Centre.
17. Bromley, D.W. 1999. Deforestation - Institutional causes and solutions. In: World forests, society and environment 1 (eds. Palo, M. and J. Usivouri). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Bromley, D.W. and M.M. Cernea. 1989. The management of common property natural resources: Some conceptual and operational fallacies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
19. Bryden, J. and C. Geisler. 2007. Community-based land reform: Lessons from Scotland. Land Use Policy 24(1): 24-34. (Pubitemid 44429684)
20. Büscher, B. and T. Mutimukuru. 2007. Buzzing too far? The ideological echo of global governance concepts on the local level: The case of the Mafungautsi Forest in Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa 24(5): 649-664. (Pubitemid 350011549)
21. Chomitz, K.M. and P. Buys. 2007. At loggerheads? Aagricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests. World Bank policy research report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22. Cronkleton, P., D. Barry, J. M. Pulhin, et al. 2010. La devolución de los derechos de manejo y la cogestión en bosques comunitarios. In: Bosques y derechos comunitarios: Las reformas en la tenencia forestal (eds. Larson, A.M., D. Barry, G.R. Dahal and C.J.P. Colfer). Pp. 47-72. Bogor Barat: CIFOR.
23. Dasgupta, A. and L. Pellegrini. 2009. The impact of Tenancy Reform in West Bengal: Evidence from the National Sample Survey. The European Journal of Development Research 21(2): 231-249.
24. Dasgupta, P. 1993. An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. de Janvry, A. 1981. The agrarian question and reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
26. de Janvry, A. and L. Ground. 1978. Types and consequences of land reform in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives 5(4): 90-112.
27. Deininger, K. 2003. Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank; and Oxford, and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Deininger, K. and H. Binswanger. 1999. The evolution of the world bank's land policy: Principles, experience, and future challenges. World Bank Research Observer 14(2): 247-76. (Pubitemid 30037680)
29. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2007. State of the world's forests 2007. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
30. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. Global forest resources assessment 2010: Main report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
31. Futemma, C. and E.S. Brondízio. 2003. Land reform and land-use changes in the lower Amazon: Implications for agricultural intensification. Human Ecology 31(3): 369-402. (Pubitemid 37216466)
32. Geist, H.J. and E.F. Lambin. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52(2): 143-150. (Pubitemid 34140417)
33. Gobierno de Bolivia. 1994. Ley de Participación Popular. La Paz. Ley 1551.
34. Gobierno de Bolivia. 1996a. Ley del Servicio Nacional de Reforma Agraria. La Paz. Ley 1715.
35. Gobierno de Bolivia. 1996b. Ley Forestal. La Paz. Ley 1700.
36. Gobierno de Bolivia. 2006. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo. La Paz.
37. Gobierno de Bolivia. 2007a. Modificaciones a la Ley No1715 de Reconducción Comunitaria de la Reforma Agraria. Ministerio de Desarrollo Rural, Agropecuario y Medio Ambiente, Viceministerio de Tierras and Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria. La Paz. Ley 3545.
38. Gobierno de Bolivia. 2007b. Plan de desarrollo sectorial - Revolucion agraria y forestal. Ministerio de Desarrollo Rural, Agropecuario y Medio Ambiente. La Paz.
39. Gobierno de Bolivia. 2009. Constitución. La Paz: Presidencia de la República.
40. Griffin K., A.R. Khan and A. Ickowitz. 2002. Poverty and the distribution of land. Journal of Agrarian Studies 2(3): 279-330. (Pubitemid 38615851)
41. Hardin, G. 1968. Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859): 1243-1248.
42. Huizer, G. 1999: Peasant mobilization for land reform: Historical case studies and theoretical considerations. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute For Social Development.
43. Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria (INRA). 2007. Plan Estratégico Nacional de Distribución de Tierras y Asentamientos Humanos (PENDTAH). La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria.
44. Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria (INRA). 2008. Breve historia del reparto de tierras en Bolivia. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria.
45. Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria (INRA). 2010. La tierra vuelve a manos indígenas y campesinas: Cambia la estructura de la propiedad agraria. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria.
46. Kaimowitz, D., P. Mendez, A. Puntodewo, et al. 2002. Spatial regression analysis of deforestation in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. In: Land use and deforestation in the Amazon (eds. Wood, C.H. and R. Porro). Pp. 41-65. University Press of Florida.
47. Kay, C. 2002. Why East Asia overtook Latin America: Agrarian reform, industrialisation and development. Third World Quarterly 23(6): 1073-1102. (Pubitemid 41737201)
48. Kay, C. and M. Urioste. 2007. Bolivia's unfinished agrarian reform: Rural poverty and development policies. In: Land, poverty and livelihoods in the era of globalization: Perspectives from developing and transition countries (Akram-Lodhi, A.H., S.M. Borras and C. Kay). London and New York: Routledge.
49. Kay, C. 2009. Development strategies and rural development: Exploring synergies, eradicating poverty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 103-137.
50. Larson, A. M. and J.C. Ribot. 2007. The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustainability Science 2(2): 189-204. (Pubitemid 47487741)
51. Larson, A. M., D. Barry and G.R. Dahal. 2010. Cambios en los patrones de tenencia en los países en desarrollo. In: Bosques y derechos comunitarios: Las reformas en la tenencia forestal (eds. Larson, A.M., D. Barry, G.R. Dahal and C.J.P. Colfer). Pp. 3-20.
52. Bogor Barat: CIFOR. Lippit, V.D. 1974: Land reform and economic development in China. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Sciences.
53. Lipton, M. 1977. Why poor people stay poor: Urban bias in world development. London: Temple Smith.
54. Lipton, M. 2009: land reform in developing countries: Property rights and property wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.
55. McCarthy, J. 2005. Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environment and Planning A 37(6): 995-1014. (Pubitemid 40936198)
56. Medina, G., B. Pokorny and B. Campbell. 2008. Favouring local development in the Amazon: Lessons from community forest management initiatives. Forest Livelihood Briefs. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
57. Nagarajan, H.-K., S. Jin and K. Deininger. 2007. Land reforms, poverty reduction, and economic growth: Evidence from India. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series.
58. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59. Pacheco, D. 2006a. Manejo forestal comercial comunitario en propiedades colectivas indígenas de las tierras tropicales de Bolivia. La Paz: Centro de Estudios para la Realidad Económica y Social, International Forestry Resources and Institutions.
60. Pacheco, P. 2006b. Agricultural expansion and deforestation in lowland Bolivia: The import substitution versus the structural adjustment model. Land Use Policy 23(3): 205-225.
61. Pacheco, P., D. Barry, P. Cronkleton, et al. 2008. From agrarian to forest tenure reforms in Latin America: Assessing the implications for local people and forests. In: The 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons. Cheltenham, England.
62. Pacheco, P., E. Ormachea, P. Cronkleton, et al. 2009. Trayectorias y tendencias de la economía forestal extractiva en el norte Amazónico de Bolivia.
63. Pellegrini, L. 2011. Forest management and poverty in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua: Reform failures? European Journal of Development Research 23: 266-283.
64. Pellegrini, L. Forthcoming. Planning and natural resources in Bolivia: Between rules without participation and participation without rules. Journal of Developing Societies.
65. Raj, K.N. and M. Tharakan. 1983. Agrarian reform in Kerala and its impact on the rural economy. A preliminary assessment. In: Agrarian reform in contemporary developing countries (ed. Ghose, A.K.). London: Croom Helm and NewYork, NY: St. Martin's Press.
66. Repetto, R. and M. Gillis (eds.). 1988. Public policies and the misuse of forest resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Rojas, D., I. Martínez, W. Cordero, et al. 2003. Tasa de deforestación de Bolivia 1993-2000. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: BOLFOR, Superintendencia Forestal.
68. Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., H. van den Hombergh and E.B. Zoomers (eds.). 2007. Partnerships in sustainable forest resource management: Learning from Latin America. Leiden: Brill.
69. Rudel, T.K. 2007. Changing agents of deforestation: From state-initiated to enterprise driven processes, 1970-2000. Land Use Policy 24(1): 35-41. (Pubitemid 44405384)
70. Ruiz, S. 2004. Redistribución de los recursos forestales en el norte amazónico boliviano. In: Retos y perspectivas del nuevo régimen forestal en el norte amazónico boliviano (De Jong, W. and S. Ruiz). Jakarta: CIFOR.
71. Shiva, V. 1993. Monocultures of the mind. Trumpeter 10(4): 2-11.
72. Southgate, D. and C.F. Runge. 1990. The institutional origins of deforestation in Latin America. Staff paper. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
73. Stanfield, J.D. 1995: Insecurity of land tenure in Nicaragua. LTC Research Paper No. 120. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
74. Sunderlin, W., J. Hatcher and M. Liddle. 2008. From exclusion to ownership? Challenges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reform. Washington DC: Rights and Resources Initiative.
75. Thiesenhusen, W. 1995: Broken promises: Agrarian reform and the Latin American campesino. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
76. Unidad de Análisis de Políticas Económicas (UDAPE). 2004. Sector Forestal 1990-2004. La Paz: Unidad de Análisis de Políticas Económicas.
77. Unidad de Análisis de Políticas Económicas (UDAPE). 2009. Diagnósticos Sectoriales: Sector Forestal. La Paz: Unidad de Análisis de Políticas Económicas.
78. Wachholtz, R., J.L. Artola, R. Camargo, et al. 2006. Avance de la deforestación mecanizada en Bolivia. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Superintendencia Forestal.
79. White, A. and A. Martin. 2002. Who owns the world's forests? Forest tenure and public forests in transition. Washington DC: Forest Trends and Center for International Environmental Law.
80. World Bank. 2008. Forests sourcebook: Practical guidance for sustaining forests in development cooperation. Washington, DC: World Bank.
81. Wunder, S. 2001. Poverty alleviation and tropical forests: What scope for synergies? World Development 29(11): 1817-1833. (Pubitemid 33033814)