Biological conversion assay using Clostridium phytofermentans to estimate plant feedstock quality

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Lee, Scott J ^a   Warnick, Thomas A ^a   Pattathil, Sivakumar ^b   Alvelo Maurosa, Jesús G ^a   Serapiglia, Michelle J ^c   McCormick, Heather ^b   Brown, Virginia ^b   Young, Naomi F ^a   Schnell, Danny J ^a   Smart, Lawrence B ^c   Hahn, Michael G ^b   Pedersen, Jeffrey F ^d,e   Leschine, Susan B ^a   Hazen, Samuel P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL CONVERSION; BROWN MIDRIBS; COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS; CONSOLIDATED BIOPROCESSING; CULTURE SUPERNATANT; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; ENERGY CROPS; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL YIELD; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPIC VARIATIONS; PLANT BIOMASS; PLANT SAMPLES; PRE-TREATMENT; RENEWABLE SOURCES; SALIX SPP; WILD TYPES;

AGRICULTURE; ASSAYS; BIOCONVERSION; BIOMASS; CLOSTRIDIUM; CONVERSION EFFICIENCY; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; GENES; SACCHARIFICATION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS; ENERGY CROP; ETHANOL; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BRACHYPODIUM DISTACHYON; CLOSTRIDIUM PHYTOFERMENTANS; SALIX;

EID: 84856592963     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Cellulose microfibrils in plants: biosynthesis, deposition, and integration into the cell wall. Brett CT, Int Rev Cytol 2000 199 161 10874579
2. Hemicelluloses. Scheller HV, Ulvskov P, Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010 61 1 263 289 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315 20192742
3. Genetic variation and breeding strategies for improved cell wall digestibility in annual forage crops. A review. Barriere Y, Guillet C, Goffner D, Pichon M, Anim Res 2003 52 3 193 228 10.1051/animres:2003018 (Pubitemid 37030345)
4. The genetics of lignin biosynthesis: connecting genotype to phenotype. Bonawitz ND, Chapple C, Ann Rev Genet 2010 337 363
5. How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Grabber JH, Crop Sci 2005 45 820 10.2135/cropsci2004.0191 (Pubitemid 40670262)
6. Comparative genome analysis of lignin biosynthesis gene families across the plant kingdom. Xu Z, Zhang D, Hu J, Zhou X, Ye X, Reichel K, Stewart N, Syrenne R, Yang X, Gao P, et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2009 10 Suppl 11 3 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S11-S3 19958513
7. Improvement of biomass through lignin modification. Li X, Weng J-K, Chapple C, Plant J 2008 54 4 569 581 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03457.x 18476864 (Pubitemid 351678045)
8. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Chen F, Dixon RA, Nat Biotech 2007 25 7 759 761 10.1038/nbt1316 (Pubitemid 47052188)
9. Genetic modification of herbacious plants for feed and fuel. Vogel KP, Jung HG, Crit Rev Plant Sc 2001 20 1 15 49 (Pubitemid 32164205)
10. Breeding for yield and quality. Hill RR Jr, Shenk JS, Barnes RF, Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement Madison: Amer Society of Agronomy, Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR Jr, 1988 809 825
11. A comparison of indirect methods of predicting in vivo digestibility of grazed forage. Scales GH, Streeter CL, Denham AH, Ward GM, J Anim Sci 1974 38 1 192 199
12. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Tilly J, Terry R, J Br Grassland Soc 1963 18 104 111 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335. x
13. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Updegraff D, Anal Biochem 1969 32 3 420 424 10.1016/S0003-2697(69)80009-6 5361396
14. Lignin determination. Kirk T, Obst J, Methods in Enzymology New York: Academic Press, Inc., Wood W, Kellogg S, 1988 87 101
15. The characterization of plant tissues by their lignin oxidation products. Hedges JI, Mann DC, Geochim Cosmochim Ac 1979 43 11 1803 1807 10.1016/0016-7037(79)90028-0
16. Rapid structural phenotyping of plant cell wall mutants by enzymatic oligosaccharide fingerprinting. Lerouxel O, Choo TS, Seveno M, Usadel B, Faye L, Lerouge P, Pauly M, Plant Physiol 2002 130 4 1754 1763 10.1104/pp.011965 12481058 (Pubitemid 36035173)
17. Quantitative trait loci and comparative genomics of cereal cell wall composition. Hazen SP, Hawley RM, Davis GL, Henrissat B, Walton JD, Plant Physiol 2003 132 1 263 271 10.1104/pp.103.020016 12746531 (Pubitemid 36599269)
18. Engineering of a high-throughput screening system to identify cellulosic biomass, pretreatments, and enzyme formulations that enhance sugar release. Studer MH, DeMartini JD, Brethauer S, McKenzie HL, Wyman CE, Biotechnol Bioeng 2009 105 2 231 238
19. A high-throughput platform for screening milligram quantities of plant biomass for lignocellulose digestibility. Santoro N, Cantu S, Tornqvist C-E, Falbel T, Bolivar J, Patterson S, Pauly M, Walton J, BioEnerg Res 2010 3 93 102 10.1007/s12155-009-9074-6
20. High-throughput microplate technique for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Chundawat S, Balan V, Dale B, Biotechnol Bioeng 2008 99 1281 1294 10.1002/bit.21805 18306256 (Pubitemid 351548668)
21. Automated assay for screening the enzymatic release of reducing sugars from micronized biomass. Navarro D, Couturier M, da Silva G, Berrin J-G, Rouau X, Asther M, Bignon C, Microb Cell Fact 2010 9 1 58 10.1186/1475-2859-9-58 20637080
22. Automated saccharification assay for determination of digestibility in plant materials. Gomez L, Whitehead C, Barakate A, Halpin C, McQueen-Mason S, Biotechnol Biofuels 2010 3 1 23 10.1186/1754-6834-3-23 20979637
23. Improved sugar conversion and ethanol yield for forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) lines with reduced lignin contents. Dien B, Sarath G, Pedersen J, Sattler S, Chen H, Funnell-Harris D, Nichols N, Cotta M, BioEnerg Res 2009 2 3 153 164 10.1007/s12155-009-9041-2
24. Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Fu C, Mielenz JR, Xiao X, Ge Y, Hamilton CY, Rodriguez M, Chen F, Foston M, Ragauskas A, Bouton J, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011
25. How biotech can transform biofuels. Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD, Sheehan J, et al. Nat Biotech 2008 26 2 169 172 10.1038/nbt0208-169 (Pubitemid 351225943)
26. Clostridium phytofermentans sp. nov., a cellulolytic mesophile from forest soil. Warnick TA, Methe BA, Leschine SB, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002 52 4 1155 1160 10.1099/ijs.0.02125-0 12148621 (Pubitemid 34846411)
27. Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. van Zyl W, Lynd L, den Haan R, McBride J, Biofuels 2007 205 235 (Pubitemid 47434547)
28. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) performance of Clostridium phytofermentans on AFEX-treated corn stover for ethanol production. Jin M, Balan V, Gunawan C, Dale BE, Biotechnol Bioeng 2011 n/a-n/a
29. A comprehensive toolkit of plant cell wall glycan-directed monoclonal antibodies. Pattathil S, Avci U, Baldwin D, Swennes AG, McGill JA, Popper Z, Bootten T, Albert A, Davis RH, Chennareddy C, et al. Plant Physiol 2010 153 2 514 525 10.1104/pp.109.151985 20363856
30. The polysaccharide composition of Poales cell walls: Poaceae cell walls are not unique. Smith BG, Harris PJ, Biochem Syst Ecol 1999 27 33 10.1016/S0305-1978(98)00068-4 (Pubitemid 28536737)
31. Impact of reduced lignin on plant fitness. Pedersen JF, Vogel KP, Funnell DL, Crop Sci 2005 45 3 812 819 10.2135/cropsci2004.0155 (Pubitemid 40670261)
32. Development and status of dedicated energy crops in the United States. Jessup R, In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 2009 45 3 282 290 10.1007/s11627-009-9221-y
33. Herbaceous energy crop development: recent progress and future prospects. Heaton EA, Flavell RB, Mascia PN, Thomas SR, Dohleman FG, Long SP, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008 19 202 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.001 18513940
34. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ Jr, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, et al. Science 2006 311 5760 484 489 10.1126/science.1114736 16439654 (Pubitemid 43158454)
35. Cell-wall composition and accessibility to hydrolytic enzymes is differentially altered in divergently bred switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) genotypes. Sarath G, Akin D, Mitchell R, Vogel K, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008 150 1 1 14 10.1007/s12010-008-8168-5 18427744
36. Brown midrib in maize and its linkage relationships. Jorgensen JR, J Am Soc Agron 1931 23 549 557 10.2134/agronj1931.00021962002300070005x
37. Applying genotyping (TILLING) and phenotyping analyses to elucidate gene function in a chemically induced sorghum mutant population. Xin Z, Wang ML, Barkley NA, Burow G, Franks C, Pederson G, Burke J, BMC Plant Biol 2008 8 103 10.1186/1471-2229-8-103 18854043
38. A nonsense mutation in a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene Is responsible for the sorghum brown midrib6 phenotype. Sattler SE, Saathoff AJ, Haas EJ, Palmer NA, Funnell-Harris DL, Sarath G, Pedersen JF, Plant Physiol 2009 150 2 584 595 10.1104/pp.109.136408 19363091
39. The brown midrib3 (bm3) mutation in maize occurs in the gene encoding caffeic acid O-methyltransferase. Vignols F, Rigau J, Torres M, Capellades M, Puigdomenech P, Plant Cell 1995 7 4 407 416 7773015
40. Composition of cell walls isolated from cell types of grain sorghum stems. Hatfield RD, Wilson JR, Mertens DR, J Sci Food Agric 1999 79 6 891 899 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990501)79:6<891::AID-JSFA304>3.0.CO;2-# (Pubitemid 29211987)
41. Allelic association, chemical characterization and saccharification properties of brown midrib mutants of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Saballos A, Vermerris W, Rivera L, Ejeta G, BioEnerg Res 2008 1 3 193 204 10.1007/s12155-008-9025-7
42. A sorghum diversity panel biofuel feedstock screen for genotypes with high hydrolysis yield potential. Vandenbrink JP, Delgado MP, Frederick JR, Feltus FA, Ind Crop Products 2010 31 3 444 448 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.01.001
43. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P, Ind Eng Chem Res 2009 48 8 3713 3729 10.1021/ie801542g
44. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Initiative TIB, Nature 2010 463 7282 763 768 10.1038/nature08747 20148030
45. Genetic improvement of willow (Salix spp.) as a dedicated bioenergy crop. Smart LB, Cameron KD, Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops NY: Springer Science, Vermerris W, 2008 347 376
46. Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Rooney WL, Blumenthal Jr, Bean B, Mullet JE, Biofpr 2007 1 2 147 157
47. Registration of BN611, AN612, BN612, and RN613 sorghum genetic stocks with stacked -6 and -12 genes. Pedersen JF, Toy JJ, Funnell DL, Sattler SE, Oliver AL, Grant RA, J Plant Reg 2008 2 3 258 262 10.3198/jpr2008.01.0065crs
48. Registration of RTx430 sorghum parental line. Miller R, Crop Sci 1984 24 1224
49. Nutrition and media. Cote RJ, Gherna RL, Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR, 1994 155 178
50. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Hungate RE, Methods Microbiol 1969 3B 117 132
51. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F, Anal Chem 1956 28 3 350 356 10.1021/ac60111a017
52. Carbohydrate analysis by a phenol-sulfuric acid method in microplate format. Masuko T, Minami A, Iwasaki N, Majima T, Nishimura S-I, Lee YC, Anal Biochem 2005 339 1 69 72 10.1016/j.ab.2004.12.001 15766712 (Pubitemid 40342680)