Effects of process conditions in submerged ultrafiltration for refinery wastewater treatment: Optimization of operating process by response surface methodology

Desalination

Volumn 287, Issue , 2012, Pages 350-361

  Yuliwati, E ^a,b   Ismail, A F ^a   Lau, W J ^a   Ng, B C ^a   Mataram, A ^a,c   Kassim, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b Bina Darma University   (Indonesia)

^c SRIWIJAYA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Air bubble flow rate; HRT; Refinery wastewater; RSM; Submerged membrane

Indexed keywords

AIR BUBBLES; HRT; REFINERY WASTEWATERS; RSM; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FLOW RATE; OPTIMIZATION; REFINING; RESERVOIRS (WATER); SURFACE PROPERTIES; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER FILTRATION;

PH EFFECTS;

AIR BUBBLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MEMBRANE; OPTIMIZATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84856585843     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.051     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Fratila-Apachitei L.E., Kennedy M.D., Linton J.D., Blume I., Schippers J.C. Influence of membrane morphology on the flux decline during dead-end ultrafiltration of refinery and petrochemical wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 182:151-159.
2. Lee W., Kang S., Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their distribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216:217-227.
3. Rautenbach R., Albrecht R. Membrane Processes 1989, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
4. , Notice Board: Environmental Quality (Industrial Effluent) Regulation 2009. http://www.mkma.org/EnvironmentalRegulation2009.htm.
5. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Cake layer formation in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:227-236.
6. Wicaksana F., Fane A.G., Chen V. Fibre movement induced by bubbling using submerged hollow fibre membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 271:186-195.
7. Le-Clech P., Jefferson B., Judd S.J. Impact of aeration, solid concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 218:117-129.
8. Howe K.J., Clark M.M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36(16):3571-3576.
9. Viero A.F., de Melo T.M., Torres A.P.R., Ferreira N.R., Sant'Anna G.L., Borges C.P., Santiago V.M.J. The effects of long-term feeding of high organic loading in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating oil refinery wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:223-230.
10. Zularisam A.W., Ismail A.F., Salim R., Mimi Sakinah, Ozaki H. The effects of natural organic matter (NOM) fractions on fouling characteristics and flux recovery of ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2007, 212(1-3):191-208.
11. Yuan Z., Li X.D. Porous PVDF/TPU blends asymmetric hollow fiber membranes prepared with the use of hydrophilic additive PVP (K30). Desalination 2008, 223:438-447.
12. Ģulfaz P.Z., Wessling M., Lammertink R.G.H. Fouling behavior of microstructured hollow fiber membranes in submerged and aerated filtrations. Water Res. 2011, 45:1865-1871.
13. Guglielmi G., Chiarani D., Judd S.J., Andreottola G. Flux criticality and sustainability in a hollow fibre submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 289:241-248.
14. Xianling L., Jianping W., Qing Y., Xuemin Z. The pilot study for oil refinery wastewater treatment using a gas-liquid-solid three phase flow airlift-bioreactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2005, 27:40-44.
15. Zularisam A.W., Ismail A.F., Salim R. Behaviour of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment: a-review. Desalination 2006, 194:211-231.
16. Saien J., Nejati H. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of pollutants in petroleum refinery wastewater under mild conditions. J. Hazard. Mat. 2007, 148:491-495.
17. Hami M.L., Al-Hasyimi M.A., Al-Doori M.M. Effect of activated carbon of BOD and COD removal in a dissolved air flotation unit treating refinery wastewater. Desalination 2007, 216:116-122.
18. Zularisam A.W., Ismail A.F., Salim M.R., Mimi Sakinah, Hiroaki O. Fabrication, fouling and foulant analyses of asymmetric polysulfone (PSf) ultrafiltration membrane fouled with natural organic matter (NOM) source waters. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 229:97-113.
19. Lau W.J., Ismail A.F. Application of response surface methodology in PES/SPEEK blend NF membrane for dyeing solution treatment. Membr. Water Treat. 2010, 1:49-60.
20. Fu J., Zhao Y., Wu Q. Optimising photoelectrocatalytic oxidation of fulvic acid using response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mat. 2007, 144:499-505.
21. Silva E.M., Rogez H., Larondelle Y. Optimization of extraction of phenolics from Inga edulis leaves using response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55:381-387.
22. Güven G., Perendeci A., Tanyolaç A. Electrochemical treatment of deproteinated whey wastewater and optimization of treatment conditions with response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mat. 2008, 157:69-78.
23. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Cake layer formation in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:227-236.
24. Saroj D.P., Guglielmi G., Chiarani D., Andreottola G. Subcritical fouling behavior modelling of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: the prediction of the time to reach critical operating condition. Desalination 2008, 231:175-181.
25. Wardrop D.M., Myers R.H. Some responce surface designs for finding optimal conditions. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 1990, 25:7-28.
26. Myers R., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology 2002, John Wiley, New York, USA.
27. Yuliwati E., Ismail A.F. Effect of additives concentration on the surface properties and performance of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes for refinery wastewater treatment. Desalination 2011, 273:226-234.
28. E. Yuliwati, A.F. Ismail, T. Matsuura, M.A. Kassim, M.S. Abdullah, Effect of modified PVDF hollow fiber submerged ultrafiltration membrane for refinery wastewater treatment, Desalination, in press.
29. Smith S.R., Taha T., Cui Z.F. Enhancing hollow fiber ultrafiltration using slug-low - a hydrodynamic study. Desalination 2002, 146:69-74.
30. Busch J., Cruse A., Marquardt W. Modelling submerged hollow-fiber filtration for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 288:94-111.
31. Khuri A.I., Cornell J.A. Response Surfaces: Designs and Analysis 1996, Marcel Dekker, ASQA Quality Press, New York.
32. Soo E.L., Salieh A.B., Basri M. Response surface methodological study on lipase-catalyzed synthesis of amino acid surfactants. Process. Biochem. 2004, 39:1511-1518.
33. Wang Y.X., Lu Z.X. Optimization of processing parameters for the mycellial growth and extracellular polysaccharide production by Boletus spp. ACCC 50328. Process. Biochem. 2005, 40:6549-6559.
34. Joglekar A.M., May A.T. Product excellence through design of experiments. Cereal Foods World 1987, 32:857-868.
35. Design-Expert® Software Version 6 User's Guide, 2001.
36. Rana-Madaria P., Nagarajan M., Rajapagol C., Garg B.S. Removal of chromium from aqueous solutions by treatment with carbon aerogel electrodes using response surface methodology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:6549-6559.
37. 2 for degradation of phenol under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165:482-489.
38. Khouni I., Marrot B., Amar R.B. Decolourization of the reconstituted dye bath effluent by commercial laccase treatment: optimization through response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156:121-133.
39. Cui Z.F., Chang S., Fane A.G. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 221:1-35.
40. Ueda T., Hata K. Treatment of domestic sewage from rural settlements by a membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34:186-196.
41. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 1996, John Wiley & Sons, USA. 4th ed.
42. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments 2002, John Wiley & Sons, USA. 2nd ed.
43. Baker R.J., Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D., Yoo B.H. Factors affecting flux in crossflow filtration. Desalination 1985, 53:81-93.
44. Ueda T., Hata K., Kikuoka Y., Seino O. Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 1997, 31:489-494.
45. Tambe D.E., Sharma M.M. Factors controlling the stability of colloid-stabilized emulsion. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1993, 157:244-253.
46. Mosqueda-Jimenez D.B., Narbaitz R.M., Matsuura T., Chowdhury G., Pleizier G., Santerre J.P. Influence of processing conditions on the properties of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:209-224.
47. Zularisam A.W., Ismail A.F., Salim M.R., Mimi Sakinah, Matsuura T. Application of coagulation-ultrafiltration hybrid process for drinking water treatment: optimization of operating conditions using experimental design. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 65:193-210.