Opportunity in austerity - A common agenda for medicine and public health

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 366, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 395-397

  Stine, Nicholas W ^a,b   Chokshi, Dave A ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACT; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MANDATORY REPORTING; MEDICAL FEE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SHORT SURVEY; TAX;

EID: 84856579273     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1112543     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:78-93.
2. National Health Expenditure Accounts by type of service and source of funds, calendar years 1960-2009. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (https://www.cms.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/ 02- NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.asp).
3. Brandt AM, Gardner M. Antagonism and accommodation: interpreting the relationship between public health and medicine in the United States during the 20th century. Am J Public Health 2000;90:707-15. (Pubitemid 30246372)
4. Internal revenue bulletin: 2011-30, Notice 2011-52. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service, July 25, 2011 (http://www.irs.gov/irb/2011-30-IRB/ ar08.html).
5. Proposed rule RIN 0938-AQ22; 42 CFR Part 425. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, March 31, 2011.