Ethics and equity: Choice or compulsion?

Public Health

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 85-86

  Sim, F ^a   Mackie, P ^a  

^a Royal society for Public Health   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERTUSSIS VACCINE;

ALTRUISM; EARLY INTERVENTION; EDITORIAL; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HERD IMMUNITY; HUMAN; IMMUNIZATION; INFECTION RISK; OBESITY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT CARE; PERTUSSIS; POLICY; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL WORK;

HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MASS VACCINATION; OBESITY; PERTUSSIS VACCINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; WHOOPING COUGH;

EID: 84856573919     PISSN: 00333506     EISSN: 14765616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.01.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Girard D.Z. Recommended or mandatory pertussis vaccination policy in developed countries: does the choice matter?. Public Health 2011, 126(2):117-122.
2. Levine R.S., Dahly D.L., Rudolf M.C.J. Identifying infants at risk of becoming obese: can we and should we?. Public Health 2011, 126(2):123-128.
3. Shannon Laura Campaigners back 'fuel-anthropy' plan. The Times 10th November 2011.