Event-driven exception handling for software engineering processes

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 99 LNBIP, Issue PART 1, 2012, Pages 414-426

  Grambow, Gregor ^a   Oberhauser, Roy ^a   Reichert, Manfred ^b  

^a AALEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complex event processing; event driven business processes; process aware information systems; process centered software engineering environments; semantic processing

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

COMPLEX EVENT PROCESSING; EVENT-DRIVEN BUSINESS PROCESSES; PROCESS-AWARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROCESS-CENTERED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT; SEMANTIC PROCESSING;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84856569624     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Rausch, A., Bartelt, C., Ternité, T., Kuhrmann, M.: The V-Modell XT Applied - Model-Driven and Document-Centric Development. In: 3rd World Congress for Software Quality, vol. III, pp. 131-138 (2005) (online supplement)
2. OpenUP (May 2011), http://epf.eclipse.org/wikis/openup/
3. Wallmüller, E.: SPI-Software Process Improvement mit Cmmi und ISO 15504. Hanser Verlag (2007)
4. Ellis, C., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Proc. ACM Conf. on Organizational Computing Systems (COOCS 1995), pp. 10-21 (1995)
5. Luo, Z., Sheth, A., Kochut, K., Miller, J.: Exception handling in workflow systems. Applied Intelligence 13(2), 125-147 (2000)
6. Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Workflow Exception Patterns. In: Martinez, F.H., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 288-302. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
7. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow resource patterns. Tech. Rep. WP 127, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology (2004)
8. Paton, N. (ed.): Active Rules in Database Systems. Springer, Berlin (1999)
9. Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-aware Information Systems -Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (to appear)
10. Grambow, G., Oberhauser, R.: Towards Automated Context-Aware Selection of Software Quality Measures. In: Proc. 5th Intl. Conf. on SW Eng. Adv. IEEE CS (2010)
11. Grambow, G., Oberhauser, R., Reichert, M.: Semantic Workflow Adaption in Support of Workflow Diversity. In: Proc. 4th Int'l Conf. on Advances in Semantic Processing (2010)
12. Grambow, G., Oberhauser, R., Reichert, M.: Towards Automatic Process-Aware Coordination in Collaborative Software Engineering. In: Proc. of the 6th Int' Conf. on Software and Data Technologies (ICSOFT 2011). NSTICC Press (to appear, 2011)
13. Oberhauser, R.: Leveraging Semantic Web Computing for Context-Aware Software Engineering Environments. In: Wu, G. (ed.) Semantic Web, In-Tech, pp. 157-179 (2010)
14. Johnson, P.M.: Requirement and Design Trade-offs in Hackystat: An In-Process Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis System. In: Proc. of 1st Int. Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE Computer Society Press (2007)
15. Espertech Event Stream Intelligence, http://www.espertech.com/products/ esper.php (retrieved April 2011)
16. World Wide Web Consortium, OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004) (retrieved April 2011)
17. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL Reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics (2006)
18. World Wide Web Consortium: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML W3C Member Submission (2004) (retrieved April 2011)
19. Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query Answering for OWL-DL with Rules. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 549-563. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
20. McBride, B.: Jena: a semantic web toolkit. Internet Computing (2002)
21. Dadam, P., Reichert, M.: The ADEPT Project: A Decade of Research and Development for Robust and Flexible Process Support - Challenges and Achievements. Springer, Computer Science - Research and Development 23(2), 81-97 (2009)
22. Grambow, G., Oberhauser, R., Reichert, M.: Employing Semantically Driven Adaptation for Amalgamating Software Quality Assurance with Process Management. In: Proc. 2nd Int'l. Conf. on Adaptive and Self-adaptive Systems and Applications (2010)
23. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Paraboschi, S., Pozzi, G.: Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM TODS 24(3), 405-451 (1999)
24. Müller, R., Greiner, U., Rahm, E.: AGENTWORK: A workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 51(2), 223-256 (2004)
25. Döhring, M., Zimmermann, B., Godehardt, E.: Extended Workflow Flexibility using Rule-Based Adaptation Patterns with Eventing Semantics. LNIP-175 (2010)
26. Barghouti, N.S.: Supporting cooperation in the marvel process-centered sde. In: Weber, H. (ed.) Fifth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Development Environments, Special issue of Software Engineering Notes, Tyson's Corner VA, vol. 17, pp. 21-31 (1992)
27. Montangero, C., Ambriola, V.: OIKOS: constructing process-centred SDEs. In: Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., Nuseibeh, B. (eds.) Software Process Modelling and Technology. Research Studies Press Advanced Software Development Series, pp. 131-151. Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton (1994)
28. Junkerman, G., Peuschel, B., Schäfer, W., Wolf, S.: Merlin: Supporting cooperation in software development through a knowledge-based environment. In: Software Process Modelling and Technology, ch. 5, pp. 103-130. Research Studies Press Ltd. (1994)
29. Kloppmann, M., Konig, D., Leymann, F., Pfau, G., Roller, D.: Business process choreography in websphere: Combining the power of BPEL and J2EE. IBM Systems Journal 43, 270-296 (2004)
30. Lanz, A., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Making Business Process Implementations Flexible and Robust: Error Handling in the AristaFlow BPM Suite. In: CAiSE 2010 Demos, Hammamet, Tunisia (2010)