Modeling and optimization of sweeping gas membrane distillation

Desalination

Volumn 287, Issue , 2012, Pages 159-166

  Khayet, M ^a   Cojocaru, C ^a   Baroudi, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Desalination; Interaction effects; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Sweeping gas membrane distillation

Indexed keywords

BINARY INTERACTIONS; DEVELOPED MODEL; GAS CIRCULATION; GAS INLET; GAS TEMPERATURE; INTERACTION EFFECTS; LIQUID FLOW RATES; LIQUID INLET TEMPERATURE; LIQUID TEMPERATURE; MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION; NACL SOLUTION; OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; OPTIMUM OPERATING CONDITIONS; ORTHOGONAL DESIGN; PERMEATE FLUX; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SALT REJECTIONS; SWEEPING GAS MEMBRANE DISTILLATION; WATER CIRCULATION;

DESALINATION; FLOW RATE; GASES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; SEAWATER; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER FILTRATION;

LIQUIDS;

DESALINATION; DISTILLATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GAS; MEMBRANE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SEAWATER; SOLUTION; SURFACE;

EID: 84856564574     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.070     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Khayet M. Membranes and theoretical modeling of membrane distillation: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164:56-88.
2. Khayet M., Godino M.P., Mengual J.I. Possibility of nuclear desalination through various membrane distillation configurations: a comparative study. Int. J. Nuclear Desalination 2003, 1:30-46.
3. Khayet M., Godino P., Mengual J.I. Theoretical and experimental studies on desalination using sweeping gas membrane method. Desalination 2003, 157:297-305.
4. Lee C.H., Hong W. Effect of operating variables on the flux and selectivity in sweep gas membrane distillation for dilute aqueous isopropanol. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:79-86.
5. Boi C., Bandini S., Sarti G.C. Pollutants removal from wastewaters through membrane distillation. Desalination 2005, 183:383-394.
6. Ding Z., Liu L., Li Z., Ma R., Yang Z. Experimental study of ammonia removal from water by membrane distillation (MD): the comparison of three configurations. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:93-103.
7. Xie Z., Duong T., Hoang M., Nguyen C., Bolto B. Ammonia removal by sweep gas membrane distillation. Water Res. 2009, 43:1693-1699.
8. Khayet M., Godino P., Mengual J.I. Theory and experiments on sweeping gas membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165:261-272.
9. Khayet M., Godino P., Mengual J.I. Nature of flow on sweeping gas membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:243-255.
10. Khayet M., Godino M.P., Mengual J.I. Thermal boundary layers in sweeping gas membrane distillation. AIChE J. 2002, 48:1488-1497.
11. Charfi K., Khayet M., Safi M.J. Numerical simulation and experimental studies on heat and mass transfer using sweeping gas membrane distillation. Desalination 2010, 259:84-96.
12. Khayet M., Cojocaru C., García-Payo C. Application of response surface methodology and experimental design in direct contact membrane distillation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:5673-5685.
13. Khayet M., Cojocaru C., García-Payo M.C. Experimental design and optimization of asymmetric flat-sheet membranes prepared for direct contact membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 351(1-2):234-245.
14. Onsekizoglu P., Bahceci K.S., Acar J. The use of factorial design for modeling membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 349:225-230.
15. Chang H., Liau J.S., Ho C.D., Wang W.H. Simulation of membrane distillation modules for desalination by developing user's model on Aspen Plus platform. Desalination 2009, 249:380-387.
16. Mohammadi T., Safavi M.A. Application of Taguchi method in optimization of desalination by vacuum membrane distillation. Desalination 2009, 249:83-89.
17. Akhnazarova S., Kafarov V. Experiment Optimization in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 1982, Mir Publishers, Moscow.
18. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
19. Bezerra M.A., Santelli R.E., Oliveira E.P., Villar L.S., Escaleira L.A. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in, analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008, 76:965-977.
20. Hampton M.A., Nguyen A.V. Nanobubbles and the nanobubble bridging capillary force. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 154:30-55.
21. Kukizaki M., Goto M. Size control of nanobubbles generated from Shirasu-porous-glass (SPG) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:386-396.
22. Redhe M., Giger M., Nilson L. An investigation of structural optimization in crashworthiness design using stochastic approach. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2004, 27:446-459.