The anti-biofouling effect of Piper betle extract against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and bacterial consortium

Desalination

Volumn 288, Issue , 2012, Pages 24-30

  Siddiqui, Muhammad Faisal ^a   Sakinah, Mimi ^a   Ismail, A F ^b   Matsuura, T ^c   Zularisam, A W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA PAHANG   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bacterial consortium; Biofouling; EPS; Piper betle extract; Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL CONSORTIUM; BIOFILM FORMATION; BIOLOGICAL ROUTE; CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE; EPS; EPS PRODUCTION; FIELD SCALE; MEMBRANE BIOFOULING; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MICROTITER PLATES; MODEL ORGANISMS; NATURAL COMPOUNDS; PIPER BETLE EXTRACT; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE; WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES;

BACTERIA; BIOFILMS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL STABILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOFOULING;

BACTERIUM; BIOFILM; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE; OPTIMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOXICITY; WASTE FACILITY; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PIPER BETEL; PIPER BETLE; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA;

EID: 84856556377     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.060     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Yun M.A., Yeon K.M., Park J.S., Lee C.H., Chun J., Lim D.J. Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40:45-52.
2. Yu C., Fang L., Lateef S.K., Wu C., Lin C. Enzymatic cleaning for controlling irreversible membrane fouling in cross-flow humic acid-fed ultrafiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177:1153-1158.
3. Flemming H.C., Scaule G., Griebe T., Schmitt J., Tamachkiarowa A. Biofouling-the Achilles heel of membrane processes. Desalination 1997, 113:215-225.
4. Ridgway F.R., Flemming H.C. Membrane biofouling. Water Treatment Membrane Processes, Membrane Biofouling 1996, 6.1-6.62. McGraw-Hill, New York. J. Mallevialle, P.E. Odendaal, M.R. Wiesner (Eds.).
5. Ramesh A., Lee D.J., Wang M.L., Hsu J.P., Juang R.S., Hwang K.J., Liu J.C., Tseng S.J. Biofouling in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41:1345-1370.
6. Xiong Y., Liu Y. Biological control of microbial attachment: a promising alternative for mitigating membrane biofouling. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86:825-837.
7. Costerton J.W. Introduction to biofilm. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 1999, 11:217-221.
8. Kubo I., Masuoka N., Ha T.J., Tsujimoto K. Antioxidant activity of anacardic acids. Food Chem. 2006, 99:55-562.
9. Sendamangalam V., Choi O.K., Kim D., Seo Y. The antibiofouling effect of polyphenols against Streptococcus mutans. Biofouling 2011, 27:9-13.
10. Nair R., Chanda S. Antimicrobial activity of Terminalia catappa, Manilkara zapota, and Piper betle leaf. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 70:390-393.
11. Lee W., Ahn C.H., Hong S., Kim S., Lee S., Baek Y., Yoon J. Evaluation of surface properties of reverse osmosis membranes on the initial biofouling stages under no filtration condition. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 351:112-122.
12. Nalina T., Rahim Z.H.A. Effect of Piper betle L. leaf extract on the virulence activity of Streptococcus mutans an in vitro study. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2006, 9:1470-1475.
13. Smullen J., Koutsou G.A., Foster H.A., Zumbé A., Storey D.M. The antibacterial activity of plant extracts containing polyphenols against Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 2007, 41:342-349.
14. Burton E., Yakandawala N., Lo Vetri K., Madhyastha M.S. A microplate spectrofluorometric assay for bacterial biofilms. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 34:1-4.
15. Cappuccino J.G., Sherman N. Microbiology- A laboratory manual 2005, Pearson Int., Ontario, Canada. 7th Edn.
16. Zhang J., Wang R., Ziang P., Liu Z. Production of exopolysaccharides bioflocculant by Sorangium cellulosum. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 34:178-181.
17. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 2005, American public health association, Washington DC. 22nd ed.
18. Wilson M. Susceptibility of oral bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial agents. J. Med. Microbiol. 1996, 44:79-87.
19. Fathilah A.R., Aishah A., Zarina M.Z. The effect of environmental stress on the growth of plaque bacteria. J. Microbiol. 2007, 4:381-386.
20. Dunne W.M. Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately?. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15:155-166.
21. Hirst C.N., Cyr H., Jordon I.A. Distribution of exopolymeric substances in the littoral sediments of an oligotrophic lake. Microb. Ecol. 2003, 46:22-32.
22. Subramanian S., Yan S., Tyagi R.D., Surampalli R.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) producing bacterial strains of municipal wastewater sludge: Isolation, molecular identification, EPS characterization and performance for sludge settling and dewatering. Water Res. 2010, 44:2253-2266.
23. Chang I.S., Lee C.H. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane coupled activated sludge system - the effects of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 1998, 120(3):221-233.
24. Ivnitsky H., Katz I., Minz D., Shimoni E., Chen Y., Tarchitzky J., Semiat R., Dosoretz C.G. Characterization of membrane biofouling in nanofiltration processes of wastewater treatment. Desalination 2005, 185:255-268.