Disorganized symptoms and executive functioning predict impaired social functioning in subjects at risk for psychosis

Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 457-460

  Eslami, Ali ^a,b,c   Jahshan, Carol ^a,b,c   Cadenhead, Kristin S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEBEPHRENIA; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 84856544171     PISSN: 08950172     EISSN: 15457222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/jnp.23.4.jnp457     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davidson M, Reichenberg A, Rabinowitz J, et al: Behavioral and intellectual markers for schizophrenia in apparently healthy male adolescents. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:1328-1335.
2. Keith SJ, Matthews SM: The diagnosis of schizophrenia: a review of onset and duration issues. Schizophr Bull 1991;17: 51-67.
3. Yung AR, McGorry PD, McFarlane CA, et al: Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22: 283-303.
4. Cannon TD, Cadenhead KS, Cornblatt B, et al: Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65: 28-37.
5. Cosway R, Byrne M, Clafferty R, et al: Neuropsychological change in young people at high risk for schizophrenia: results from the first two neuropsychological assessments of the Edinburgh High-Risk Study. Psychol Med 2000; 30:1111-1121.
6. Eastvold AD, Heaton RK, Cadenhead KS: Neurocognitive deficits in the (putative) prodrome and first episode of psychosis. Schizophr Res 2007; 93:266-277.
7. Niendam TA, Bearden CE, Johnson JK, et al: Neurocognitive performance and functional disability in the psychosis prodrome. Schizophr Res 2006; 84:100-111.
8. Niendam TA, Bearden CE, Zinberg J, et al: The course of neurocognition and social functioning in individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33:772-781.
9. Seeber K, Cadenhead KS: How does studying schizotypal personality disorder inform us about the prodrome of schizophrenia? Curr Psychiatry Reports 2005; 7:41-50.
10. Ballon JS, Kaur T, Marks II, et al: Social functioning in young people at risk for schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2007; 151:29-35.
11. Jahshan C, Heaton RK, Golshan S, et al: Course of neurocognitive deficits in the prodrome and first episode of schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 2010; 24:109-120.
12. Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL, et al: Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29:703-715.
13. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW, et al: The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29:633-651.
14. Haroun N, Dunn L, Haroun A, et al: Risk and protection in prodromal schizophrenia: ethical implications for clinical practice and future research. Schizophr Bull 2003; 32:166-178.
15. Addington J, Addington D: Patterns of premorbid functioning in first-episode psychosis: relationship to 2-year outcome. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005; 112:40-46.