Price of CO 2 emissions and use of wood in Europe

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 15, Issue , 2012, Pages 123-131

  Lauri, Pekka ^a   Kallio, A Maarit I ^a   Schneider, Uwe A ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CO 2 emission trading; Coal; Forest industry; Renewable energy; Wood biomass; Wood market

Indexed keywords

EMISSION TRADING; FOREST INDUSTRY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; WOOD BIOMASS; WOOD MARKET;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COAL INDUSTRY; COSTS; FORESTRY; FOSSIL FUELS; INDUSTRY;

WOOD;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; EMISSION; EUROPE; FOSSIL FUELS; LOGS; POWER GENERATION; WOOD;

EID: 84856540860     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams D., Alig R., Callaway J., McCarl B., Winnett S. The Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM): model structure and policy applications. Research Paper, United States Forest Service 1996.
2. Alig R., Latta G., Adams D., McCarl B. Mitigating greenhouse gases: the importance of land base interactions among forests, agriculture, and residential development in the face of changes in bioenergy and carbon prices. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12(1):67-75.
3. Al-Mansour F., Zuwala J. An evaluation of biomass co-firing in Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy 2010, 34:620-629.
4. Asikainen A., Liiri H., Peltola S., Karjalainen T., Laitila J. Forest energy potential in Europe (EU27). Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 2008, 69. 33 pp.
5. Berggren M., Ljunggren E., Johnsson F. Biomass co-firing potentials for electricity generation in Poland - Matching supply and co-firing opportunities. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008, 32(9):865-879.
6. Bolkesjø T.F., Obersteiner M., Solberg B. Information technology and the newsprint demand in Western Europe: a Bayesian approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2003, 1644-1652.
7. Bolkesjø T.J., Trømborg E., Solberg B. Bioenergy from the forest sector: Economic potential and interactions with timber and forest products markets in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2006, 21:175-185.
8. Bright R.M., Strømman A.H., Hawkings T.R. Environmental assessment of wood-based biofuel production and consumption scenarios in Norway. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2010, 14(3):422-439.
9. Buongiorno J., Zhu S., Zhang D., Turner J., Tomberlin D. The Global Forest Sector Model 2003, Elsevier.
10. Chasamil M.L., Buongiorno J. The demand for paper and paperboard: econometric models for the European Union. Applied Economics 2000, 32:987-999.
11. De S., Assadi M. Impact of cofiring biomass with coal in power plants - a techno-economic assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy 2009, 33:283-293.
12. European Environment Agency, 2006. How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? EEA Report No 7/2006, 67 p.
13. EUWOOD Real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Final Report of EUWOOD project 2010.
14. Hansson J., Berndes G., Johnsson F., Kjärstadt J. Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation - an assessment of the potential in EU27. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1444-1455.
15. Information technology and the forest sector. IUFRO World Series 2005, vol. 18. 235 pp. L. Hetemäki, S. Nilsson (Eds.).
16. Hetsch S. Potential sustainable wood supply in Europe. UNECE/FAO Timber Section report 2008.
17. IEA World Energy Outlook 2009 2009, IEA Publications.
18. Ince P.J., Kramp A.D., Yoo D., Skog K.E., Sample V.A. Modeling future U.S. forest sector market impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17:142-156.
19. International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2010 2010, IEA Publications.
20. Kallio A.M.I., Moiseyev A., Solberg B. The Global Forest Sector Model EFI-GTM - the model structure. EFI Technical Report 2004, 15.
21. Kallio A.M.I., Anttila P., McCormick M., Asikainen A. Are the Finnish targets for the energy use of forest chips realistic - assessment with a spatial market model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17:110-126.
22. Kangas K., Baudin A. Modelling and projections of forest products demand, supply and trade in Europe. Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper ECE/TIM/DP/30, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland 2003, 203 pp. http://www.unece.org/timber/docs/efsos/03-sept/dp-30.pdf.
23. Laitila J., Asikainen A., Anttila P. Energiapuuvarat. Energiapuun korjuun ympäristövaikutukset, Research Report 2008, http://www.metsavastaa.net/energiapuu/raportti, M. Kuusinen, H. Ilvesniemi (Eds.).
24. Lecocq F., Caurla S., Delacote P., Barkaoui A., Sauquet A. Paying for forest carbon or stimulating fuelwood demand? Insights from the French Forest Sector Model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 2:157-168.
25. Moiseyev A., Solberg B., Kallio A.M.I., Lindner M. An economic analysis of the potential contribution of forest biomass to the EU RES target and its implications for the EU forest industries. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17:197-213.
26. Odenberger M., Unger T., Johnson F. Pathways for the North European electricity supply. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1660-1677.
27. Ranta T., Lahtinen P., Elo J., Laitila J. The effect of CO2 emission trade on the wood fuel market in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy 2007, 31:535-542.
28. Raunikar R., Buongiorno J., Turner J.A., Zhu S. Global outlook for wood and forests with the bioenergy demand implied by scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12:45-56.
29. Ryymin R., Pohto P., Laitila J., Humala I., Rajahonka M., Kallio J., Selosmaa J., Anttila P., Lehtoranta T. Metsäenergian hankinnan uudistaminen 2008, HSE Executive Education. http://www.hseee.fi/files/1388_JEME-raportti.pdf.
30. Samuelson P. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review 1952, 42:283-303.
31. Schleupner C., Schneider U.A. Effects of bioenergy policies and targets on European wetland restoration options. Environmental Science and Policy 2010, 13(8):721-732.
32. Schneider U.A., Balkovic J., De Cara S., Franklin O., Fritz S., Havlik P., Huck I., Jantke K., Kallio A.M.I., Kraxner F., Moiseyev A., Obersteiner M., Ramos C.I., Schleupner C., Schmid E., Schwab D., Skalsky R. The European Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model - EUFASOM. Working Papers, Research Unit Sustainablity and Global Change, Hamburg University and Centre for Marine and Atmosperic Change FNU-156 2008.
33. Schwarzbauer P., Stern T. Energy vs. material: economic impacts of a "wood-for-energy scenario" on the forest-based sector in Austria - a simulation approach. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12(1):31-38.
34. Segers R. Three options to calculate the percentage renewables energy: an example for a EU policy debate. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3243-3248.
35. 2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy 2006, 6:49-72.
36. Sjølie H.K., Trømborg E., Solberg B., Bolkesjø T.F. Effects and costs of policies to increase bioenergy use and reduce GHG emissions from heating in Norway. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12:57-66.
37. SOEF State of Europe's forest: report on sustainable forest management in Europe published by Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE) and UNECE/FAO 2007.
38. Tarjanne R., Kivistö A. Sähkön tuotantokustannusvertailu, Lappeenranta University of Technology research report EN B-175 2008.
39. Trømborg E., Solberg B. Forest sector impacts of the increased use of wood in energy production in Norway. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 12(1):39-47.
40. Trømborg E., Bolkesjø T.J., Solberg B. Impacts of policy means for increased use of forest-based bioenergy in Norway-a spatial partial equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5980-5990.
41. CEPI (Confederation of European Paper Industries) http://www.cepi.org.
42. FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division) http://www.fao.org.
43. FOEX (Finnish Option Exchange Indexes) http://www.foex.fi.
44. EUROSTAT (European Commission Statistics Division) http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.
45. IEA (International Energy Agency) http://www.iea.org.
46. METINFO (Finnish Forest Research Institute Statistics Division) http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/.
47. RISI (Resource Information Systems Inc) http://www.risiinfo.com.