A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 589-595

  Leahy, Siobhan ^a   O'Neill, Cian ^a   Sohun, Rhoda ^a   Jakeman, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Body fat; Fat free mass; Human; Photon; Segmental analysis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY COMPOSITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856518502     PISSN: 14396319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2010-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baumgartner RN (1996) Electrical impedance and total body electrical conductivity. In: Roche AF, Heymsfield S, Lohman TG (eds) Human body composition. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 79-107
2. JM Bland DG Altman 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307 310 2868172 1:STN:280:DyaL287hslWqsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 (Pubitemid 16134762)
3. RG Bowden BA Lanning EI Doyle HM Johnston EI Nassar B Slonaker G Scanes C Rasmussen 2005 Comparison of body composition measures to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry J Exerc Physiol online 8 2 1 9 (Pubitemid 41018391)
4. P Deurenberg JA Weststrate I Paymans K van der Kooy 1988 Factors affecting bioelectrical impedance measurements in humans Eur J Clin Nutr 42 12 1017 1022 3234328 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7ntVKjtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19037176)
5. P Deurenberg A Andreoli P Borg K Kukkonen-Harjula A de Lorenzo WD van Marken Lichtenbelt G Testolin R Vigano N Vollaard 2001 The validity of predicted body fat percentage from body mass index and from impedance in samples of five European populations Eur J Clin Nutr 55 11 973 979 11641746 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3Mrmtlaiuw%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601254 (Pubitemid 33040094)
6. S Duz M Kocak F Korkusuz 2009 Evaluation of body composition using three different methods compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Eur J Sport Sci 9 3 181 190 10.1080/17461390902763425
7. KJ Ellis 2000 Human body composition: in vivo methods Physiol Rev 80 2 649 680 10747204 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3htF2ntQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30164946)
8. A Furstenberg A Davenport 2011 Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments in outpatient hemodialysis Patients Am J Kidney Dis 57 1 123 129 20692749 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.05.022
9. MR Gallagher KZ Walker K O'Dea 1998 The influence of a breakfast meal on the assessment of body composition using bioelectrical impedence Eur J Clin Nutr 52 94 97 9505152 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ms1Smsg%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600520 (Pubitemid 28064075)
10. D Gallagher SB Heymsfield M Heo SA Jebb PR Murgatroyd Y Sakamoto 2000 Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index Am J Clin Nutr 72 694 701 10966886 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3cXmsFGrsbg%3D (Pubitemid 30667089)
11. L Genton D Hans UG Kyle C Pichard 2002 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods Nutrition 18 1 66 70 11827768 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhtVKrt74%3D 10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00700-6 (Pubitemid 34097716)
12. SG Glickman CS Marn MA Supiano DR Dengel 2004 Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity J Appl Physiol 97 509 514 15075304 10.1152/japplphysiol.01234.2003 (Pubitemid 38963117)
13. Huizenga R, Barden HS, Oates MK (2007) Precision of Lunar iDXA total body BMD and composition measurements on obese subjects. Paper presented at the ISCD Annual Meeting. Tampa, FL, USA
14. H Hull Q He J Thornton F Javed J Wang RN Pierson Jr D Gallagher 2009 iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross calibration study J Clin Densitom 12 1 95 102 19028125 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.09.004
15. S Kriemler J Puder L Zahner R Roth C Braun-Fahrlander G Bedogni 2009 Cross-validation of bioelectrical inpedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children Eur J Clin Nutr 63 619 626 18285806 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzitFOnuw%3D%3D 10.1038/ejcn.2008.19
16. UG Kyle I Bosaeus AD De Lorenzo P Deurenberg M Elia JM Gomez BL Heitmann L Kent-Smith JC Melchoir M Pirlich H Scharfetter AMWJ Schols C Pichard 2004 Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part 1: review of principles and methods Clin Nutr 23 1226 1243 15380917 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004 (Pubitemid 39243041)
17. M Malavolti C Mussi M Poli A Fantuzzi G Salvioli N Battistini G Bedogni 2003 Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in healthy subjects aged 21-82 years Ann Hum Biol 30 4 380 391 12881138 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szkvValsA%3D%3D 10.1080/0301446031000095211 (Pubitemid 36872480)
18. Oates MK, Barden HS, Huizenga R (2007) Body composition with idxa in obese subjects with and without metabolic syndrome. Paper presented at the ISCD Annual Meeting. Tampa, FL
19. Y Oshima T Shiga 2006 Within-day variability of whole-body and segmental bioelectrical impedence in a standing position Eur J Clin Nutr 60 938 941 16482076 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vls1Ghtw%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602402 (Pubitemid 44161013)
20. A Pietrobelli F Rubiano M-P St-Onge SB Heymsfield 2004 New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole body analysis Eur J Clin Nutr 58 1479 1484 15138459 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crjtlygtQ%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601993 (Pubitemid 39530035)
21. R Roubenoff JJ Kehayias B Dawson-Hughes SB Heymsfield 1993 Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in body-composition studies: not yet a "gold standard" Am J Clin Nutr 58 589 591 8237861 1:STN:280: DyaK2c%2Fls1agtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23319942)
22. F Rubiano C Nunez SB Heymsfield 2000 A comparison of body composition techniques Ann NY Acad Sci 904 335 338 10865766 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czisVSrtQ%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06477.x (Pubitemid 30389214)
23. G Sun CR French GR Martin B Younghusband RC Green Y Xie M Mathews JR Barron DG Fitzpatrick W Gulliver H Zhang 2005 Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population Am J Clin Nutr 81 74 78 15640463 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFyjtL4%3D (Pubitemid 43090697)
24. PA Tataranni E Ravussin 1995 Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese individuals Am J Clin Nutr 62 4 730 734 7572700 1:STN:280: DyaK28%2FlsVCjtA%3D%3D
25. N Wattanapenpaiboon W Lukito BJG Strauss BHH Hsu-Hage ML Wahlqvist DB Stroud 1998 Agreement of skinfold measurement and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in estimating total body fat in Anglo-Celtic Australians Int J Obes 22 854 860 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvislKktg%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800672 (Pubitemid 28395951)