Picture-word interference and the Response-Exclusion Hypothesis: A response to Mulatti and Coltheart

Cortex

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 373-377

  Mahon, Bradford Z ^a,b   Garcea, Frank E ^a   Navarrete, Eduardo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LATENT PERIOD; NOTE; PAINTING; PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE; RESPONSE EXCLUSION HYPOTHESIS; WALKER CARCINOMA; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84856500226     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.008     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Abdel Rahman R., Melinger A. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24(5):713-734.
2. Bloem I., La Heij W. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48(3):468-488.
3. Caramazza A., Hillis A.E. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature 1991, 349(6312):788-790.
4. Chatterjee A. Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition 2010, 2(1):79-116.
5. Dalrymple-Alford E.C. Associative facilitation and interference inthe Stroop color-word tests. Perception and Psychophysics 1972, 11(4):274-276.
6. Dell G.S., Oppenheim G.M., Kittredge A.K. Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23(4):583-608.
7. Dell G.S., Reich P.A. Stages in sentence production - An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20(6):611-629.
8. Glaser W.R., Glaser M.O. Context effects on Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118(1):13-42.
9. Hickok G. Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(7):1229-1243.
10. Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34(1):249-256.
11. Machery E. Concept empiricism: A methodological critique. Cognition 2007, 104(1):19-46.
12. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102(1-3):59-70.
13. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Why does lexical selection have to be so hard? Comment on Abdel Rahman and Melinger's swinging lexical network proposal. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24(5):735-748.
14. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33(3):503-535.
15. Miozzo M., Caramazza A. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:228-252.
16. Navarrete E., Costa A. Phonological activation of ignoredpictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53(3):359-377.
17. Oppenheim G.M., Dell G.S., Schwartz M.F. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition 2010, 114(2):227-252.
18. Tanenhaus M.K., Flanigan H.P., Seidenberg M.S. Orthographicand phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition 1980, 8(6):513-520.