Meeting the challenges of implementing an intervention to promote work ability and health-related quality of life at construction worksites: A process evaluation

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1483-1491

  Oude Hengel, Karen M ^a,b   Blatter, Birgitte M ^a,b   Van Der Molen, Henk F ^c,d   Joling, Catelijne I ^b,e   Proper, Karin I ^b   Bongers, Paulien M ^a,b   Van Der Beek, Allard J ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d Arbouw   (Netherlands)

^e 365 BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSTRUCTION WORK; EMPOWERMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; WORK CAPACITY; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84856496325     PISSN: 10762752     EISSN: 15365948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182398e03     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:119-127. (Pubitemid 34098464)
2. Kristensen TS. Intervention studies in occupational epidemiology. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:205-210. (Pubitemid 40300032)
3. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2004;21:3-12. (Pubitemid 38095807)
4. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
5. Steckler A, Linnan L. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
6. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332:413-416. (Pubitemid 43797387)
7. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;29:175-201.
8. Nielsen K, Fredslund H, Christensen KB, Albertsen K. Success or failure? Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites. Work & Stress. 2004;20:272-287. (Pubitemid 44794315)
9. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:134-147.
10. Oude Hengel KM, Joling CI, Proper KI, van der Molen HF, Bongers PM. Intervention mapping as a framework for developing an intervention at the worksite for older construction workers. Am J Health Promot. 2011;26:e1-e10.
11. Oude Hengel KM, Joling CI, Proper KI, Blatter BM, Bongers PM. A worksite prevention program for construction workers: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:336. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-336.
12. Murta SG, Sanderson K, Oldenburg B. Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21:248-254. (Pubitemid 46417559)
13. Cherniack M, Morse T, Henning R, Seidner A, Punnett L. Health promotion site selection blues: barriers to participation and implementation. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:626-634.
14. Kidd P, Parshall M, Wojcik S, Struttmann T. Overcoming recruitment challenges in construction safety intervention research. Am J Ind Med. 2004;45:297-304. (Pubitemid 38337738)
15. Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Fisher KJ. Participation in worksite health promotion: a critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. Health Educ Q. 1993;20:391-408.
16. Linnan LA, Sorensen G, Colditz G, Klar DN, Emmons KM. Using theory to understand the multiple determinants of low participation in worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28:591-607. (Pubitemid 33602907)
17. Johnson CC, Lai YL, Rice J, Rose D, Webber LS. ACTION live: using process evaluation to describe implementation of a worksite wellness program. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:S14-S21.
18. Robroek SJ, van Lenthe FJ, van Empelen P, Burdorf A. Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-26.
19. Strijk JE, Proper KI, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W. A process evaluation of a worksite vitality intervention among ageing hospital workers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:58. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-58.
20. Jansen YJ, Bal R, Bruijnzeels M, Foets M, Frenken R, de Bont A. Coping with methodological dilemmas; about establishing the effectiveness of interventions in routine medical practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;13:160. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-160. (Pubitemid 44974807)
21. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T, Gold L. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;89:788-793. (Pubitemid 39127890)
22. Linnan L, Bowling M, Childress J, et al. Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1503-1509.
23. Lassen A, Bruselius-Jensen M, Sommer HM, Thorsen AV, Trolle E. Factors influencing participation rates and employees' attitudes toward promoting healthy eating at blue-collar worksites. Health Educ Res. 2007;22:727-736. (Pubitemid 47428961)
24. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995;8:109-112.
25. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:42-5.