A benchmark spike-in data set for biomarker identification in metabolomics

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 16-24

  Franceschi, Pietro ^a   Masuero, Domenico ^a   Vrhovsek, Urska ^a   Mattivi, Fulvio ^a   Wehrens, Ron ^a  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Benchmark; Biomarker selection; Metabolomics; Spike in data

Indexed keywords

LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; STATISTICAL TESTS;

BENCHMARK; BIOMARKER IDENTIFICATION; BIOMARKER SELECTIONS; DATA SET; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; METABOLOMICS; OMICS TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; REAL DATA SETS; SPIKE-IN DATA;

BIOMARKERS;

EID: 84856460035     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1420     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gehlenborg N, O'Donoghuo S I, Baliga N S, Goesmann A, Hibbs M A, Kitano H, Kohlbacher O, Neuweger H, Schneider R, Tenenbaum D, Gavin A C. Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat. Meth. 2010; 7(3): S56-S68.
2. Choe S E, Boutros M, Michelson A M, Church GM, Halfon M S. Preferred analysis methods for Affymetrix GeneChips revealed by a wholly defined control dataset. Genome Biol. 2005; 6(2): R16.
3. McCall MN, Irizarry R A. Consolidated strategy for the analysis of microarray spike-in data. Nucl. Acids Res. 2008; 36(17): e108.
4. Griffin JL. Ask not what data standards can do for you but what you can do for data standards: a personal view of reporting standardisation in metabolomic experiments. Metabolomics 2011; 7: 305-306.
5. Wehrens R, Franceschi P, Vrhovsek U, and Mattivi F. Stability-based biomarker selection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011; 705:15-23. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.01.039.
6. Wold S, Sjöström M, and Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Systl. 2001; 58: 109-130.
7. Vrhovsek U, Rigo A, Tonon D, Mattivi F. Quantitation of polyphenols in different apple varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004; 52(21): 6532-6538.
8. Team R D C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2011. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
9. Smith C A, Want E J, O'Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem. 2006; 78: 779-787.
10. Kuhl C, Tautenhahn R, Neumann S. CAMERA: collection of annotation related methods for mass spectrometry data, 2010. R package version 1.5.9.
11. Noble W S.. How does multiple testing correction work? Nat. Biotechnol. 2009; 27(12): 1135-1137.
12. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 1995; 57: 289-300.
13. Chong IG, Jun CH. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005; 78: 103-112.
14. Want E J, Wilson I D, Gika H, Theodoridis G, Plumb R S, Shockcor J, Holmes E, Nicholson J K. Global metabolic profiling procedures for urine using UPLC-MS. Nat. Protoc. 2010; 5(6): 1005-18. doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.50.
15. Brouillard R, Dangles O. Flavonoids and flower colour. In Harborne JB, editor, The Flavonoids. Chapman & Hall: London, 1994; 565-588.
16. Vanzo A, Vrhovsek U, Tramer F, Mattivi F, Passamonti S. Exceptionally fast uptake and metabolism of cyanidin 3-glucoside by rat kidneys and liver. J. Nat. Prod. 2011; 74: 1049-1054.