Microbial diversity in the larval gut of field and laboratory populations of the sugarcane weevil Sphenophorus levis (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2679-2691

  Rinke, R ^a   Costa, A S ^a   Fonseca, F P P ^a   Almeida, L C ^b   Delalibera, I ^c   Henrique Silva, F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

^b Centro de Tecnologia Copersucar   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cellulose degrading activity; Microbiota; Sphenophorus levis; Sugarcane weevil

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; RNA 16S; BACTERIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

ALPHAPROTEOBACTERIA; ARTICLE; BACTEROIDETES; BETAPROTEOBACTERIA; CANDIDATUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; FIELD STUDY; FIRMICUTES; FLAVOBACTERIACEAE; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; INSECT CELL CULTURE; INTESTINE FLORA; LABORATORY; LARVA; LYSIS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SPHENOPHORUS LEVIS; SUGARCANE; WEEVIL; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; INTESTINE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; INTESTINES; LARVA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; WEEVILS;

EID: 84856439740     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/2011.November.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, et al. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
2. Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston R and Seidman J (1994). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 27 (1): 2.4.1-2.4.2.
3. Blanco A and Pastor FIJ (1993). Characterization of cellulase-free xylanases from the newly isolated Bacillus sp strain Bp-23. Can. J. Microbiol. 39: 1162-1166.
4. Blanco A, Diaz P, Zueco J, Parascandola P, et al. (1999). A multidomain xylanase from a Bacillus sp. with a region homologous to thermostabilizing domains of thermophilic enzymes. Microbiology 145: 2163-2170.
5. Brauman A (2000). Effect of gut transit and mound deposit on soil organic matter transformations in the soil feeding termite: a review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 36: 117-125.
6. Broderick NA, Raffa KF, Goodman RM and Handelsman J (2004). Census of the bacterial community of the gypsy moth larval midgut by using culturing and culture-independent methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 293-300.
7. Cardoza YJ, Klepzig KD and Raffa KF (2006). Bacteria in oral secretions of an endophytic insect inhibit antagonistic fungi. Ecol. Entomol. 31: 636-645.
8. Chao A (1984). Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11: 265-270.
9. Degaspari N, Botelho PSM, Almeida LC and Castilho HJ (1987). Biology of Sphenophorus levis Vaurie, 1978 (Col, Curculionidae), with artificial diet and in the field. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 22: 553-558.
10. Delalibera IJ, Handelsman J and Raffa KF (2005). Contrasts in cellulolytic activities of gut microorganisms between the wood borer, Saperda vestita (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), and the bark beetles, Ips pini and Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ. Entomol. 34: 541-547.
11. Dillon RJ and Dillon VM (2004). The gut bacteria of insects: nonpathogenic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49: 71-92.
12. Dunn AK and Stabb EV (2005). Culture-independent characterization of the microbiota of the ant lion Myrmeleon mobilis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8784-8794.
13. Ewing WH (1986). Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, 4th edn. Elsevier, New York.
14. Felsenstein J (1993). PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
15. Geib SM, Jimenez-Gasco MDM, Carlson JE, Tien M, et al. (2009). Effect of host tree species on cellulase activity and bacterial community composition in the gut of larval Asian Longhorned Beetle. Insect Symbiont Interact. 38: 686-699.
16. Hankin L and Anagnostakis SL (1975). The use of solid media for detection of enzyme production by fungi. Mycology 67: 597-607.
17. Heddi A, Charles H, Khatchadourian C, Bonnot G, et al. (1998). Molecular characterization of the principal symbiotic bacteria of the weevil Sitophilus oryzae: a peculiar G + C content of an endocytobiotic DNA J. Mol. Evol. 47: 52-61.
18. Hunt J and Charnley AK (1981). Abundance and distribution of the gut flora of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 38: 378-385.
19. Kane MD and Breznak JA (1991). Effect of host diet on production of organic acids and methane by cockroach gut bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 2628-2634.
20. Lefèvre C, Charles H, Vallier A, Delobel B, et al. (2004). Endosymbiont phylogenesis in the dryophthoridae weevils: evidence for bacterial replacement. Mol. Biol Evol. 21: 965-973.
21. Mattanovich D, Callewaert N, Rouze P, Lin YC, et al. (2009). Open access to sequence: browsing the Pichia pastoris genome. Microb. Cell Fact. 8: 53.
22. Mead LJ, Khachatourians GG and Jones GA (1988). Microbial ecology of the gut in laboratory stocks of the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fab.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 1174-1181.
23. Nardon P, Kermarrec A and Nardon C (1984). Distinctive morphological features of the larvae of Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) and Metamasius hemipterus (Linne) (Coleoptera-Curculionidae), banana-tree parasites. Fruits 39: 180-187.
24. Pastor FI, Pujol X, Blanco A, Vidal T, et al. (2001). Molecular cloning and characterization of a multidomain endoglucanase from Paenibacillus sp BP-23: evaluation of its performance in pulp refining. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55: 61-68.
25. Pittman GW, Brumbley SM, Allsopp PG and O'Neill SL (2008). Assessment of gut bacteria for a paratransgenic approach to control Dermolepida albohirtum larvae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4036-4043.
26. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
27. Santo Domingo JW, Kaufman JW, Klug MJ and Holben WE (1998a). Influence of diet on the structure and function of the bacterial hindgut community in crickets. Mol. Ecol. 7: 761-767.
28. Santo Domingo JW, Kaufman MG, Klug MJ and Tiedje JM (1998b). Characterization of the cricket hindgut microbiota with fluorescently labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 752-755.
29. Schloss PD and Handelsman J (2005). Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 1501-1506.
30. Sittenfeld A, Uribe-Lorio L, Mora M, Nielsen V, et al. (2002). Does a polyphagous caterpillar have the same gut microbiota when feeding on different species of food plants? Rev. Biol. Trop. 50: 547-560.
31. Sparovek G, Berndes G and Egeskog A (2007). Sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: a Biofuels. Bioref 1: 270-282.
32. Sugimura M, Watanabe H, Lo N and Saito H (2003). Purification, characterization, cDNA cloning and nucleotide sequencing of a cellulase from the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle, Psacothea hilaris. Eur. J. Biochem. 270: 3455-3460.
33. Teather RM and Wood PJ (1982). Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43: 777-780.
34. Vanin SA (1990). A new species of Sphenophorus schoenher from Brazil (Coleoptera, Curculionidade, Rhynchophorinae). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 34: 697-701.
35. Vettore AL, da Silva FR, Kemper EL and Arruda P (2001). The libraries that made SUCEST. Genet. Mol. Biol. 24: 1-7.
36. Watanabe H and Tokuda G (2001). Animal cellulases. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58: 1167-1178.
37. Watanabe H and Tokuda G (2010). Cellulolytic systems in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55: 609-632.
38. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA and Lane DJ (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173: 697-703.