Technology adoption for use in instruction by secondary technology education teachers

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 44-59

  Kotrlik, Joe W ^a   Redmann, Donna H ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856428318     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v21i1.a.3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbott, M., & Fouts, J. T. (2001). The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation State Challenge Grants: TAGLIT data analysis. Bothell, WA: Fouts and Associates, LLC. Retrieved on November 3, 2008, from http://instruction.nsd.org/vision/docs/TAGLITDataAnalysis.pdf
2. Allen, L. (2008). The technology implications of A Nation at Risk, Phi Delta Kappan, 89(8), 608-610.
3. Anderson, A. A. (1996). Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1), 61-77.
4. Bower, B. L. (1998). Instructional computer use in the community college: A discussion of the research and its implications. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 6(1), 59-66.
5. Brinkerhoff, J. (2006). Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration and beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 22-43.
6. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. (2003). What the research says about barriers to the use of ICT in teaching. Retrieved on January 27, 2007, from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/ictrn/.
7. Budin, H. (1999). The computer enters the classroom. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 656-669.
8. Chapman, B. F. (2006). An analysis of the factor and adoption of computer technology by business teacher educators. NABTE Review, (33), 22-28.
9. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox, American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
12. rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13. th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
14. th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
15. Kotrlik, J. W., Redmann, D. H., Harrison, B. C., & Handley, C. H. (2000). Information technology related professional development needs of Louisiana agriscience teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(1), 18-29.
16. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342.
17. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub L. No. 107-1105. (2001).Washington, DC: U. S. Congress.
18. Park, S. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Examining barriers in technology-enhanced problem-based learning: Using a performance support systems approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 631-643.
19. Redmann, D. H., & Kotrlik, J. W. (2004). Analysis of technology integration in the teaching-learning process in selected career and technical education programs. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29(1), 3-25.
20. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16). New York: Academic Press.
21. th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
22. Roward, C. (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved on October 6, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000090.pdf
23. st century: A report on teachers' use of technology. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
24. Snedecor, G., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods (8rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
25. THE 2006 innovators. (2006, December 1). T.H.E. Journal, 33(17), 14-27. Retrieved on October 27, 2008 from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/19790.
26. Thomas, R., Adams, M., Meghani, N., & Smith, M. (2002). Internet integration in high schools: Patterns, opportunities, and barriers. St. Paul, MN: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education. (ERIC Document Accession #: ED 476 034). Retrieved on May 24, 2007, from http://www.nccte.org/publications/infosynthesis/r&dreport/Internet_Integration.pdf.
27. Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253-271.
28. Waugh, W. L. (2004). Using personal attributes to predict technology adoption: A study of college faculty. NABTE Review, (31) 58-63.
29. Womble, M. N., Adams, J. E., & Stitt-Gohdes, W. L. (2000). Business and marketing education programs in Georgia: Focus groups examine issues for program reform. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 42(1), 38-57.