Interactions of gold nanoparticles with freshwater aquatic macrophytes are size and species dependent

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 194-201

  Glenn, J Brad ^a   White, Sarah A ^a   Klaine, Stephen J ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquatic macrophyte; Gold; Nanoparticle; Sorption; Trophic transfer

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC MACROPHYTES; AQUATIC PLANTS; DRY TISSUES; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY; GOLD CONCENTRATION; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; GOLD NANOPARTICLES; GOLD NANOSPHERES; IN-VIVO; MACROPHYTES; MYRIOPHYLLUM; ROOT TISSUES; ROOT UPTAKE; SALINITY TOLERANCE; TIME POINTS; TROPHIC TRANSFER; VASCULAR PLANT; WATER COLUMNS; WELL WATER;

ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NANOPARTICLES; SORPTION; TISSUE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

GOLD;

FRESH WATER; GOLD NANOPARTICLE;

AQUIFER POLLUTION; FERN; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; GOLD; MACROPHYTE; MORPHOLOGY; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SALINITY TOLERANCE; SORPTION; VASCULAR PLANT; WATER COLUMN; WELL WATER;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; AZOLLA CAROLINIANA; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EGERIA DENSA; FERN; HARVEST INDEX; MACROPHYTE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MYRIOPHYLLUM SIMULANS; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE PARTITIONING; PLANT ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; PLANT ROOT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; SALT TOLERANCE; SUSPENSION; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TROPHIC LEVEL;

FRESH WATER; GOLD; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; PLANT ROOTS; PLANTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

AZOLLA CAROLINIANA; EGERIA DENSA; FILICOPHYTA; MYRIOPHYLLUM SIMULANS; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 84856425482     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.728     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Murphy CJ, Sau TK, Gole AM, Orendorff CJ, Gao J, Gou L, Hunyadi SE, Li T. 2005. Anisotropic metal nanoparticles: Synthesis, assembly, and optical applications. J Phys Chem B 109: 13857-13870.
2. Sau TK, Murphy CJ. 2004. Room temperature, high-yield synthesis of multiple shapes of gold nanoparticles in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 126: 8648-8649.
3. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Hunyadi SE, Stone JW, Sisco PN, Alkilany A, Kinard BE, Hankins P. 2008. Chemical sensing and imaging with metallic nanorods. Chem Commun 544-557.
4. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Stone JW, Sisco PN, Alkilany AM, Goldsmith EC, Baxter SC. 2008. Gold nanoparticles in biology: Beyond toxicity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res 41: 1721-1730.
5. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC. 2003. The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: The influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 107: 668-677.
6. El-Sayed MA. 2001. Some interesting properties of metals confined in time and nanometer space of different shapes. Acc Chem Res 34: 257-264.
7. Colvin VL. 2003. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 23: 1166-1170.
8. Shukla R, Bansal V, Chaudhary M, Basu A, Bhonde RR, Sastry M. 2005. Biocompatibility of gold nanoparticles and their endocytotic fate inside the cellular compartment: A microscopic overview. Langmuir 21: 10644-10654.
9. Wigginton NS, Haus KL, Hochella MF. 2007. Aquatic environmental nanoparticles. J Environ Monit 9: 1306-1316.
10. Limbach LK, Bereiter R, Muller E, Krebs R, Galli R, Stark WJ. 2008. Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: Influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 42: 5828-5833.
11. Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Perez-Rivera J, Hristovski K. 2009. Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 43: 6757-6763.
12. Singh RP, Agrawal M. 2008. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Manag 28: 347-358.
13. Lin S, Reppert J, Hu Q, Hudson JS, Reid ML, Ratnikova TA, Rao AM, Luo H, Ke PC. 2009. Uptake, translocation, and transmission of carbon nanomaterials in rice plants. Small 10: 1128-1132.
14. Lee WM, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS. 2008. Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): Plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 1915-1921.
15. Lee CW, Mahendra S, Zodrow K, Li D, Tsai YC, Braam J, Alvarez PJJ. 2010. Developmental phytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Toxicol Chem 29: 669-675.
16. Ma X, Geiser-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A. 2010. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci Total Environ 408: 3053-3061.
17. Ferry JL, Craig P, Hexel C, Sisco P, Frey R, Pennington PL, Fulton MH, Scott IG, Decho AW, Kashiwada S, Murphy CJ, Shaw TJ. 2009. Transfer of gold nanoparticles from the water column to the estuarine food web. Nat Nanotechnol 4: 441-444.
18. 4 genus Spartina (Poaceae). New Phytol 184: 216-233.
19. Bristow JM, Whitcombe M. 1971. The role of roots in the nutrition of aquatic vascular plants. Am J Bot 58: 8-13.
20. Denny P. 1972. Sites of nutrient absorption in aquatic macrophytes. J Ecol 60: 819-829.
21. Anderson C, Moreno F, Geurts F, Wreesmann C, Ghomshei M, Meech J. 2005. A comparative analysis of gold-rich plant material using various analytical methods. Microchem J 81: 81-85.
22. Cattaneo A, Carignan R. 1983. A colorimetric method for measuring the surface area of aquatic plants. Aquat Bot 17: 291-294.
23. Carpita NC. 1982. Limiting diameters of pores and the surface structure of plant cell walls. Science 218: 813-814.
24. Eichert T, Kurtz A, Steiner U, Goldbach HE. 2008. Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water-suspended nanoparticles. Physiol Plant 134: 151-160.
25. Keeley JE. 1990. Photosynthetic pathways in freshwater aquatic plants. Tree 5: 329-333.
26. Busby CH, Gunning BES. 1984. Microtubules and morphogenesis in stomata of the water fern Azolla: An unusual mode of guard cell and pore development. Protoplasma 122: 108-119.
27. Lin D, Xing B. 2008. Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42: 5580-5585.
28. Battke F, Leopold K, Maier M, Schmidhalter U, Schuster M. 2007. Palladium exposure of barley: Uptake and effects. Plant Biol 10: 272-276.
29. Parida AK, Das AB. 2004. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60: 324-349.
30. Hauenstein E, Ramirez C. 1986. The influence of salinity on the distribution of Egeria densa in the Valdivia river basin, Chile. Arch Hyrobiol 107: 511-519.
31. Goodman AM, Ganf GG, Dandy GC, Maier HR, Gibbs MS. 2010. The response of freshwater plants to salinity pulses. Aquat Bot 93: 59-67.
32. Haller WT, Sutton DL, Barlow WC. 1974. Effects of salinity on growth of several aquatic macrophytes. Ecology 55: 891-894.
33. Sorrell BK, Dromgoole FI. 1987. Oxygen transport in the submerged freshwater macrophyte Egeria densa planch. I. Oxygen production, storage and release. Aquat Bot 28: 63-80.
34. Ligaba A, Shen H, Shibata K, Yamamoto Y, Tanakamaru S, Matsumoto H. 2004. The role of phosphorus in aluminum-induced citrate and malate exudation from rape (Brassica napus). Physiol Plant 120: 575-584.
35. Lipton DS, Blanchar RW, Blevins DG. 1987. Citrate, malate, and succinate concentrations in exudates from P-sufficient and P-stressed Medicago sativa L. seedlings. Plant Physiol 85: 315-317.