Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for Plant species selection (Case study: Reclamation plan of sungun Copper Mine; Iran)

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1104-1113

  Alavi, Iraj ^a   Alinejad Rokny, Hamid ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Multi criteria evaluation decision; Plant species selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856420465     PISSN: 19918178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akbari, A.D., M. Osanloo and H. Hamidian, 2006. Selecting post mining land use through analytical hierarchy processing method: case study in Sungun copper open pit mine of Iran, MPES conference.
2. Alavi, I., A.D. Akbari, and M. Parsaei, 2011. Plant type Selection for Sarcheshmeh Copper Mine reclamation by Fuzzy-AHP method, BLOUR science and expertise magazine, AMIRKABIR University of Technology, 29: 10-17.
3. Bangian, A.H. and M. Osanloo, 2008. Multi Attribute Decision Model for Plant Species Selection in Mine Reclamation Plans: Case study sungun copper mine, Post-Mining, February, 6-8, 1-11.
4. Bellman, R.E., and L.A. Zadeh, 1977. Local and fuzzy logics, In: Dunn JM, Epstein G (eds) Modern uses of multiple-valued logic. Kluwer, Boston, 158-165.
5. Bojadziev, G., and M. Bojadziev, 1998. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic applications, World Scientific, Singapore.
6. Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 17: 233-247.
7. Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Research, 95: 649-655.
8. Chen, C.T., C.T. Lin, and S.F. Huang, 2006. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, Int. J. Prod. Economic, 102: 289-301.
9. Chen, C.T., 2000. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 114: 1-9.
10. Deng, H., 1999. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison, Int. J. Approx Reason, 21: 215-231.
11. Ertugrul, I. and A. Tus, 2007. Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a mine firm, Fuzzy Optim Decis Making, 6: 29-49.
12. Ertugrul, I. and N. Karakaşoglu, 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for academic member selection in engineering faculty, International Joint Conferences on Computer, Information, and Systems Sciences, and Engineering (CIS2E 06) December, 4-14.
13. Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon, 1981. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Springer, Berlin.
14. Kahraman, C., U. Cebeci and Z. Ulukan, 2003. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, Logist Inf. Manag, 16(6): 382-394.
15. Liang, G.S., 1999. Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts, Eur. J. Oper. Research, 112: 682-691.
16. Osanloo, M. and M. Parsaei, 2004. Sarcheshmeh Copper Mine reclamation, safety congress, Iran, 316-325.
17. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. Soltanmohammadi, H., M. Osanloo and A.B. Aghajani, 2010. An analytical approach with a reliable logic and a ranking policy for post-mining land-use determination, Land Use Policy, 27: 364-372.
19. Vaidya, O.S. & S. Kumar, 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications, Eur. J. Oper. Research, 169: 1-29.
20. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and W.A. Pedrcyz, 1983. Fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 11: 229-241.
21. Wang, T.C. and Y.H. Chen, 2007. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection, Omega, 35: 384-388.
22. Wang, Y.M. and T.M.S. Elhag, 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Syst. Application, 31: 309-319.
23. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control., 8: 338-353.
24. Zadeh, L.A., 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I, Inf. Science, 8: 199-249.
25. Zimmermann, H.J., 1992. Fuzzy set theory and its applications, In: Dunn JM, Epstein G (eds) Modern uses of multiple-valued logic, Kluwer, Boston.