Erratum to Demystifying peer review. (Health Education & Behavior, (2012), 39, 1, (3-7), 10.1177/1090198111433309);Demystifying peer review

Health Education and Behavior

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-7

  Simons Morton, Bruce ^a   Abraido Lanza, Ana F ^b   Bernhardt, Jay M ^c   Schoenthaler, Antoinette ^d   Schnitzer, Amanda ^e   Allegrante, John P ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Society for Public Health Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856413119     PISSN: 10901981     EISSN: 15526127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1090198112442149     Document Type: Erratum

References (5)

1. Cummings P.,Rivara F. P.Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine. 2002;156:11-13.
2. DeMaria A. N.Peer review: Better than the alternatives.Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40:1017-1018.
3. KolowichS. (2011, July19). Killing peer review. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/07/19/debate_over_whether_social_web_sites_can_replace_peer_review.
4. Peer review: A critical inquiry. Shatz D., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowland & Littlefield; 2004:.
5. Thomson Reuters. (2011). The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/.