Cancellation of IVF-ET cycles: Poor prognosis, poor responder, or variability of the response to controlled ovarian hyperstimualtion? An analysis of 142 cancellations;Annulations en fécondation in vitro : mauvais pronostic, mauvaises répondeuses, ou variabilité de la réponse - la stimulation ? Analyse de 142 annulations

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 41-47

  Lamazou, F ^a,b,c   Fuchs, F ^d   Grynberg, M ^a,b,c   Gallot, V ^a,b,c   Herzog, E ^a   Fanchin, R ^a,b,c   Frydman, N ^a,b,c   Frydman, R ^a,b,c  

^a HÔPITAL ANTOINE BÉCLÈRE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

AFC; AMH; IVF; IVF in modified natural cycle; Ovarian reserve; Poor prognosis; Poor responder

Indexed keywords

FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THERAPY EFFECT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); OVARIAN FOLLICLE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT REFUSAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856409117     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: 17730430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. S.D. Keay, N.H. Liversedge, R.S. Mathur, and J.M. Jenkins Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1997 521 527 (Pubitemid 27240414)
2. B. Kumbak, U. Ulug, B. Erzik, H. Akbas, and M. Bahceci Early clinical pregnancy loss rate in poor responder patients does not change compared to age-matched normoresponders Fertil Steril 91 2009 106 109
3. L. Reyftmann, H. Déchaud, V. Loup, T. Anahory, C. Brunet-Joyeux, and N. Lacroix Natural cycle in vitro fertilization cycle in poor responders Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35 2007 352 358 (Pubitemid 46551767)
4. V.N. Weitzman, L. Engmann, A. DiLuigi, D. Maier, J. Nulsen, and C. Benadiva Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes Fertil Steril 92 2009 226 230
5. W.B. Schoolcraft, E.S. Surrey, D.A. Minjarez, J.M. Stevens, and D.K. Gardner Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol? Fertil Steril 89 2008 151 156
6. N.G. Mahutte, and A. Arici Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in poor responders Fertil Steril 87 2007 241 249 (Pubitemid 46176922)
7. R. Marci, D. Caserta, V. Dolo, C. Tatone, A. Pavan, and M. Moscarini GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial Reprod Biomed Online 11 2005 189 193 (Pubitemid 41086943)
8. G. Barrenetxea, J.A. Agirregoikoa, M.R. Jiménez, A.L. de Larruzea, T. Ganzabal, and K. Carbonero Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles Fertil Steril 89 2008 546 553 (Pubitemid 351335051)
9. C.I. Duvan, B. Berker, N.O. Turhan, and H. Satiroglu Oral contraceptive pretreatment does not improve outcome in microdose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol among poor responder intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients J Assist Reprod Genet 25 2008 89 93
10. J.L. Frattarelli, G.D. McWilliams, M.J. Hill, K.A. Miller, and R.T. Scott Jr. Low-dose aspirin use does not improve in vitro fertilization outcomes in poor responders Fertil Steril 89 2008 1113 1117 (Pubitemid 351671723)
11. I. Cedrin-Durnerin, B. Bständig, F. Hervé, J. Wolf, M. Uzan, and J. Hugues A comparative study of high fixed-dose and decremental-dose regimens of gonadotropins in a minidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare protocol for poor responders Fertil Steril 73 2000 1055 1056 (Pubitemid 30227537)
12. E.R. Klinkert, F.J. Broekmans, C.W. Looman, J.D. Habbema, and E.R. te Velde Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 20 2005 611 615 (Pubitemid 40425484)
13. Z. Wei, X. Cheng, H. Li, Y. Cao, L. Cong, and P. Zhou Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization Reprod Biol Endocrinol 17 2010 26
14. T. Kucuk, H. Kozinoglu, and A. Kaba Growth hormone co-treatment within a GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with poor ovarian response: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial J Assist Reprod Genet 25 2008 123 127
15. J.L. Yovich, and J.D. Stanger Growth hormone supplementation improves implantation and pregnancy productivity rates for poor-prognosis patients undertaking IVF Reprod Biomed Online 21 2010 37 49
16. B.C. Tarlatzis, L. Zepiridis, G. Grimbizis, and J. Bontis Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review Hum Reprod Update 9 2003 61 76 (Pubitemid 36305584)
17. F. Morgia, M. Sbracia, M. Schimberni, A. Giallonardo, C. Piscitelli, and P. Giannini A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization Fertil Steril 81 2004 1542 1547 (Pubitemid 38748996)
18. B. Ata, K. Yakin, B. Balaban, and B. Urman Embryo implantation rates in natural and stimulated assisted reproduction treatment cycles in poor responders Reprod Biomed Online 17 2008 207 212
19. E. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Modified natural cycle for IVF does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in poor responders with high day 3 FSH levels, as a last resort prior to oocyte donation Hum Reprod 19 2004 2545 2549 (Pubitemid 39481280)
20. E. Papaleo, L. De Santis, F. Fusi, N. Doldi, C. Brigante, and G. Marelli Natural cycle as first approach in aged patients with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a pilot study Gynecol Endocrinol 22 2006 351 354 (Pubitemid 44180260)
21. D.H. Méndez Lozano, R. Fanchin, N. Chevalier, E. Feyereisen, L. Hesters, and N. Frydman The follicular flushing duplicate the pregnancy rate on semi natural cycle IVF J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 36 2007 36 41 (Pubitemid 46616615)
22. K. Jayaprakasan, B. Campbell, J. Hopkisson, I. Johnson, and N. Raine-Fenning A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation Fertil Steril 93 2010 855 864
23. M.Y. Chang, C.H. Chiang, T.T. Hsieh, Y.K. Soong, and K.H. Hsu Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies Fertil Steril 69 1998 505 510
24. I.H. Lok, S.K. Yip, L.P. Cheung, P.H. Yin Leung, and C.J. Haines Adjuvant low-dose aspirin therapy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Fertil Steril 81 2004 556 561 (Pubitemid 38376110)
25. A. Wunsch, B. Sonntag, and M. Simoni Polymorphism of the FSH receptor and ovarian response to FSH Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 68 2007 160 166 (Pubitemid 47223081)
26. M. Simoni, E. Nieschlag, and J. Gromoll Isoforms and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the FSH receptor gene: implications for human reproduction Hum Reprod Update 8 2002 413 421 (Pubitemid 35175203)
27. F.J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D.J. Hendriks, B.W. Mol, and C.B. Lambalk A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum Reprod Update 12 2006 685 718 (Pubitemid 44605509)
28. K. Jayaprakasan, S. Deb, M. Batcha, J. Hopkisson, I. Johnson, and B. Campbell The cohort of antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm reflects the quantitative status of ovarian reserve as assessed by serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone and response to controlled ovarian stimulation Fertil Steril 94 2010 1775 1781
29. S. Deb, M. Batcha, B.K. Campbell, K. Jayaprakasan, J.S. Clewes, and J.F. Hopkisson The predictive value of the automated quantification of the number and size of small antral follicles in women undergoing ART Hum Reprod 24 2009 2124 2132
30. V.K. Genro, M. Grynberg, J.B. Scheffer, I. Roux, R. Frydman, and R. Fanchin Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels are negatively related to Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) in normo-cycling women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation Hum Reprod 26 2011 671 677
31. F. Lamazou, V. Genro, F. Fuchs, M. Grynberg, V. Gallot, and N. Achour-Frydman Serum AMH level is not a predictive value for IVF in modified natural cycle: analysis of 342 cycles J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 40 2011 205 210
32. F.M. Ubaldi, L. Rienzi, S. Ferrero, E. Baroni, F. Sapienza, and L. Cobellis Management of poor responders in IVF Reprod Biomed Online 10 2005 235 246 (Pubitemid 40246642)
33. M. Schimberni, F. Morgia, J. Colabianchi, A. Giallonardo, C. Piscitelli, and P. Giannini Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles Fertil Steril 92 2009 1297 1301
34. S.E. Elizur, D. Aslan, A. Shulman, B. Weisz, D. Bider, and J. Dor Modified natural cycle using GnRH antagonist can be an optional treatment in poor responders undergoing IVF J Assist Reprod Genet 22 2005 75 79 (Pubitemid 40487054)
35. W. Verpoest, B.C. Fauser, E. Papanikolaou, C. Staessen, L. Van Landuyt, and P. Donoso Chromosomal aneuploidy in embryos conceived with unstimulated cycle IVF Hum Reprod 23 2008 2369 2371
36. I.J. Kadoch, R. Fanchin, N. Frydman, A. Le Du, and R. Frydman Controlled natural cycle IVF: a novel approach for a dominant follicle during an in-vitro maturation cycle Reprod Biomed Online 14 2007 598 601
37. R.G. Edwards IVF, IVM, natural cycle IVF, minimal stimulation IVF - time for a rethink Reprod Biomed Online 15 2007 106 119 (Pubitemid 47162103)
38. J.H. Lim, S.H. Yang, and R.C. Chian New alternative to infertility treatment for women without ovarian stimulation Reprod Biomed Online 14 2007 547 549
39. B. Vollenhoven, T. Osianlis, and J. Catt Is there an ideal stimulation regimen for IVF for poor responders and does it change with age? J Assist Reprod Genet 25 2008 523 529
40. N. Gleicher, A. Weghofer, and D.H. Barad Improvement in diminished ovarian reserve after dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation Reprod Biomed Online 21 2010 360 365
41. D.H. Barad, A. Weghofer, and N. Gleicher Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment of ovarian failure Fertil Steril 91 2009 e14
42. D. Barad, H. Brill, and N. Gleicher Update on the use of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation among women with diminished ovarian function J Assist Reprod Genet 24 2007 629 634
43. A. Wiser, O. Gonen, Y. Ghetler, T. Shavit, A. Berkovitz, and A. Shulman Addition of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) for poor-responder patients before and during IVF treatment improves the pregnancy rate: a randomized prospective study Hum Reprod 25 2010 2496 2500
44. M. Sönmezer, A.P. Cil, and K. Oktay Ongoing pregnancies from early retrieval of prematurely developing antral follicles after DHEA supplementation Reprod Biomed Online 19 2009 816 819
45. F. Fábregues, J. Peñarrubia, M. Creus, D. Manau, G. Casals, and F. Carmona Transdermal testosterone may improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins in low-responder IVF patients: a randomized, clinical trial Hum Reprod 24 2009 349 359