The effect of the width to length ratios of corrosion defects on the burst pressures of transmission pipelines

Engineering Failure Analysis

Volumn 21, Issue , 2012, Pages 21-30

  Fekete, Gábor ^a   Varga, László ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Burst pressure; Corrosion defect; FEA; Transmission pipeline; Verification

Indexed keywords

BURST PRESSURES; CORRODED PIPELINES; CORROSION DEFECT; LENGTH RATIO; MEASUREMENT DATA; METAL LOSS; OUTER SURFACE; PIPE WALLS; STEEL PIPELINE; TRANSMISSION PIPELINE; TRANSMISSION PIPELINES;

CORROSION RATE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION; PIPELINES; SURFACE DEFECTS; VERIFICATION;

PIPE;

EID: 84856401822     PISSN: 13506307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adib-Ramezani H., Jeong J., Pluvinage G. Structural integrity evaluation of X52 gas pipes subjected to external corrosion defects using the SINTAP procedure. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2006, 83:420-432.
2. American Society of Mechanical Engineer. Manual for remaining strength of corroded pipelines. ANSI/ASME B31.G, 1991.
3. Kiefner J, Vieth P. A modified criterion for evaluating the strenght of corroded pipe. Final report for PR 3-805 project to the Pipeline Supervisory Committee of the American Gas Association, Battelle, Ohio; 1989.
4. Recommended Practice, DET NORSKE VERITAS, DNV-RP-F101, Corroded Pipelines, 2004.
5. Fu B, Batte A. An overview of advanced methods for the assessment of corrosion in linepipe. Offshore Technology Report - OTO 1999 051. August 1999.
6. Vieth PH, Kiefner JF. RSTRENG user's manual. Pipeline Research Supervisory Committee. American Gas Association; 1993.
7. Bjornoy O., Cramer H., Sigurdsson G. Probabilistic calibrated design equation for burst strength assessment of corroded pipelines. ISOPE 1997.
8. Kastner W. Critical crack sizes in ductile piping. Int J Pres Ves Pip 1981, 9:197-219.
9. Leis B., Stephens D. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe part ii: alternative criterion. ISOPE 1997.
10. Anon: bulletin on formulas and calculations for casing, tubing, drill pipe, and line pipe properties. API Bulletin 5C3, 6th ed., October 1994.
11. Chiodo Mario S.G., Ruggieri Claudio Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stress-based criteria: numerical studies and verification analysis. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2009, 86:164-176.
12. John F. Kiefner. Role of hydrostatic testing in pipeline integrity assessment, Northeast Pipeline Integrity Workshop, Albany, New York, 2001.
13. Diniz J.L.C., Vieira R.D., Castro J.T., Benjamin A.C., Freire J.L.F. Stress and strain analysis of pipelines with localized metal loss. Experim Mech 2006, 46:765-775.
14. Oh Chang-Kyun, Kim Yun-Jae, Baek Jong-Hyun, Kim Young-Pyo, Kim Woo-Sik Ductile failure analysis of API X65 pipes with notch-type defects using a local fracture criterion. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2007, 84:512-525.
15. Choi J.B., Goo B.K., Kim J.C., Kim Y.J., Kim W.S. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2003, 80:121-128.
16. Dotta Fernando, Ruggieri Claudio Structural integrity assessments of high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using a micromechanics model. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2004, 81:761-770.
17. Adib H., Jallouf S., Schmitt C., Carmasol A., Pluvinage G. Evaluation of the effect of corrosion defects on the structural integrity of X52 gas pipelines using the SINTAP procedure and notch theory. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2007, 84:123-131.
18. Bridgman P.W. The compressibility of thirty metals as a function of pressure and temperature. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 1923, 58:163-242.
19. Schlumberger: Well Integrity, May 2004. http://www.schlumberger.com.
20. Fekete G, Varga L. Extension of pit corrosion effect on pipelines. Periodica Polytechnica, in press.
21. Belytschko T., Liu W., Moran B. Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures 2003, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.