Ovarian reserve tests

Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 108-113

  Jirge, Padma Rekha ^a  

^a Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic   (India)

Author keywords

anti Mullerian hormone; Antral follicle count; follicle stimulating hormone; ovarian reserve; ovarian reserve tests

Indexed keywords

CLOMIFENE CITRATE; ESTRADIOL; FOLLITROPIN; GONADORELIN AGONIST; INHIBIN B; MUELLERIAN INHIBITING FACTOR;

ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; BIOPSY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMALE SUBFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; ORGAN SIZE; OVARIAN FUNCTION TEST; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVARIAN RESERVE TEST; OVARY BIOPSY; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVARY VOLUME; OVULATION INDUCTION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856399822     PISSN: 09741208     EISSN: 19984766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.92283     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Scott RT, Hofmann GE. Prognostic assessment of ovarian reserve. FertilSteril1995;63:1-11.
2. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod1992;7:1342-6. (Pubitemid 23042150)
3. Nikolaou D,Templeton A. Early ovarian ageing: Ahypothesis: Detection and clinical relevance.Hum Reprod 2003;18:1137-9. (Pubitemid 36740554)
4. Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, Schoemaker J,Lambalk CB.The clomiphene citrate challenge test versus the exogenous folliclestimulating hormone ovarian reserve test as a single test for identification of low responders and hyperresponders to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1714-22. (Pubitemid 43816417)
5. Broer SL, Dólleman M, Opmeer BC, Fauser BC, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ. AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarianhyperstimulation: Ameta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:46-54.
6. Kahraman S, Vicdan K, Isik AZ, Ozgün OD, Alaybeyoglu L, Polat G, et al. Clomiphene citrate challenge test in the assessment of ovarian reserve before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;73:177-82. (Pubitemid 27285985)
7. Chuang CC,Chen CD, Chao KH, Chen SU,Ho HN, YangY. Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003;79:63-8.
8. de Bruin JP, teVelde ER. Female reproductive ageing: Concepts and consequences. In: Tulandi T, Gosden RG, editors. Preservation of Fertility. London, UK: Taylor and Francis; 2004. p.3.
9. Wood JW. Fecundity and natural fertility in humans. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1989;11:61-109.
10. Piette C, de Mouzon J, Bachelot A, Spira A. In-vitro fertilization (influence of woman's age on pregnancy rates). Hum Reprod 1990;5:56-9. (Pubitemid 20111634)
11. Padilla SL, Garcia JE. Effect of maternal age and number of in vitro fertilization procedures on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 1989;52:270-3. (Pubitemid 19192143)
12. Seibel MM, Kearnan M, Kiessling A. Parameters that predict success for natural cycle in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1995;63:1251-4.
13. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Hunault CC, Scheffer GJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, et al. Use of ovarianreservetests for the prediction of ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained or mild male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:182-90. (Pubitemid 43263331)
14. Scott RT, Toner JP, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Robinson S, Rosenwaks Z. Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1989;51:651-4. (Pubitemid 19097780)
15. Toner JP, Philput CB, Jones GS, Muasher SJ. Basal follicle stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age. Fertil Steril 1991;55:784-91.
16. Sharif K, Elgendy M, Lashen H, Afnan M. Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors of in vitro fertilization outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:107-12. (Pubitemid 28025366)
17. Erdem M, Erdem A, Gursoy R, Biberoglu K. Comparison of basal and clomiphene citrate induced FSH and inhibin B, ovarian volume and antral follicle counts as ovarian reserve tests and predictors of poor ovarian response in IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:37-45. (Pubitemid 39028875)
18. Scott RT Jr, Hofmann, GE, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. Intercycle variability of day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels and its effect on stimulation quality in in vitro fertilization. FertilSteril 1990;54:297-302. (Pubitemid 20256240)
19. Kwee J, SchatsR, McDonnell J, Lambalk CB, Schoemaker J. Intercycle variability of ovarian reserve tests: Results of a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 2004;19:590-5. (Pubitemid 38344522)
20. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, Habbema JD, teVelde ER. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: Ameta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1091-100. (Pubitemid 36547844)
21. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:685-718. (Pubitemid 44605509)
22. Esposito MA, Coutifaris C, Barnhart KT. A moderately elevated day 3 FSH concentration has limited predictive value, especially in younger women. Hum Reprod 2002;17:118-23. (Pubitemid 34130272)
23. Durlinger AL, Visser JA, Themmen AP. Regulation of ovarian function: The role of anti-Mullerian hormone. Reproduction 2002;124:601-9. (Pubitemid 35402334)
24. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, teVelde ER, Fauser BC, Bancsi LF, de Jong FH, et al. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: Anovel measure of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2002;17:3065-71. (Pubitemid 35469254)
25. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Visser JA, et al. anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: Potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 2004;10:77-83. (Pubitemid 38196508)
26. de Vet A, Laven JS, de Jong FH, Themmen AP, Fauser BC. anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels: Aputative marker for ovarian aging. Fertil Steril 2002;77:357-62. (Pubitemid 34083560)
27. La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A. Serum anti- Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod2006;21:3103-7. (Pubitemid 44811610)
28. Hehenkamp JK, Loomans CW, Themmen AP, de Jong FH, teVelde ER, Broekmans FJ. anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial fluctuation. J ClinEndocrinolMetab2006;10:4057-63. (Pubitemid 44536885)
29. Fanchin R, Taieb J, Lozano DH, Ducot B, Frydman R, Bouyer J. Highreproducibility of serum anti-Mullerian hormone measurements suggests a multi-staged follicular secretion and strengthens its role in the assessment of ovarian follicular status. Hum Reprod 2005;20:923-7. (Pubitemid 40667836)
30. Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P.Antral follicle count, anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B: Predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 2005;112:1384-90 (Pubitemid 43961267)
31. Tremellen KP, Kolo M, Gilmore A, Lekamge DN. anti-Mullerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:20-4. (Pubitemid 40424710)
32. La Marca A, Giulini S, Tirelli A, Bertucci E, Marsella T, Xella S, et al. anti- Müllerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 2007;22:766-71.
33. Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, Jamieson M, Traynor I, Gaudoin M, et al. anti-Müllerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2009;24:867-75.
34. Nelson SM, Messow MC, McConnachie A, Wallace H, Kelsey T, Fleming R, et al. External validation of nomogram for the decline in serum anti- Müllerian hormone in women: Apopulation study of 15,834 infertility patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:204-6.
35. Almog B, Shehata F, Suissa S, Holzer H, Shalom-Paz E, La Marca A, et al. Age-related normograms of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in a population of infertile women: Amulticenter study. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2359-63.
36. Peñarrubia J, Fábregues F, Manau D, Creus M, Casals G, Casamitjana R, et al. Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment. Hum Reprod 2005;20:915-22. (Pubitemid 40667835)
37. Fiçicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z. Early follicular anti-Müllerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2006;85:592-6. (Pubitemid 43261548)
38. Fanchin R, Mendez Lozano DH, Frydman N, Gougeon A, di Clemente N, Frydman R, et al. anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations in the follicular fluid of the preovulatory follicle are predictive of the implantation potential of the ensuing embryo obtained by in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:1796-802. (Pubitemid 46997191)
39. Van Rooij IA, Tonkelaar I, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Scheffer GJ, de Jong FH, et al. anti-Mullerian hormone is a promising predictor for the occurrence of the menopausal transition. Menopause 2004;11:601-6. (Pubitemid 40353222)
40. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Scheffer GJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, de Jong FH, et al. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study. Fertil Steril 2005;83:979-87.
41. Gnoth C, Schuring AN, Friol K, Tigges J, Mallmann P, Godehardt E. Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program. Hum Reprod 2005;23:1359-65. (Pubitemid 351770586)
42. Seifer DB, Lambert-Messerlian G, Hogan JW, Gardiner AC, Blazar AS, Berk CA, et al. Day 3 serum inhibin-B is predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril 1997;67:110-4. (Pubitemid 26428422)
43. Seifer DB, Scott RT Jr, Bergh PA, Abrogast LK, Friedman CI, Mack CK, et al. Women with declining ovarian reserve may demonstrate a decrease in day 3 serum inhibin B before a rise in day 3 folliclestimulating hormone. Fertil Steril 1999;72:63-5. (Pubitemid 29300262)
44. Corson SL, Gutmann J, Batzer FR, Wallace H, Klein N, Soules MR. Inhibin-B as a test of ovarian reserve for infertile women. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2818-21. (Pubitemid 29520700)
45. Hall JE, Welt CK, Cramer DW. Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999;14:409-15. (Pubitemid 29097396)
46. Dzik A, Lambert-Messerlian G, Izzo VM, Soares JB, Pinotti JA, Seifer DB. Inhibin B response to EFORT is associated with the outcome of oocyte retrieval in the subsequent in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril 2000;74:1114-7.
47. Licciardi FL, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z. Day 3 estradiol serum concentrations as prognosticators of ovarian stimulation response and pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1995;64:991-4.
48. Smotrich DB, Widra EA, Gindoff PR, Levy MJ, Hall JL, Stillman RJ. Prognostic value of day 3 estradiol on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1136-40.
49. Evers JL, Slaats P, Land JA, Dumoulin JC, Dunselman GA. Elevated levels of basal estradiol-17b predict poor response in patients with normal basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1998;69:1010-4. (Pubitemid 28274888)
50. Frattarelli JL, Paul A Bergh PA, Drews MR, Sharara FI, Scott RT Jr. Evaluation of basal estradiol levels in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril 2000;74:518-24.
51. Jain T, Soules MR, Collins JA. Comparison of basal follicle-stimulating hormone versus the clomiphene citrate challenge test for ovarian reserve screening. Fertil Steril 2004;82:180-5. (Pubitemid 38968796)
52. Maheshwari A, Fowler P, Bhattacharya S. Assessment of ovarian reserveshould we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum Reprod 2006;21:2729-35 (Pubitemid 44566980)
53. Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, Looman CW, de Jong FH, teVelde ER. Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet 2005;22:65-73. (Pubitemid 40487053)
54. Haadsma MA, Bukman A, Groen H, Roeloffzen EM, Groenewoud ER, Heineman MJ, et al. The number of small antral follicles (2-6 mm) determines the outcome of endocrine ovarian reserve tests in a subfertile population. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1932-41.
55. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, teVelde ER. Impact of repeated antral follicle counts on the prediction of poor ovarian response in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004;81:35-41. (Pubitemid 38058325)
56. Hendriks DJ, Kwee J, Mol BW, teVelde ER, Broekmans FJ. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: Acomparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2007;87:764-75. (Pubitemid 46550395)
57. Kwee J, Elting ME, Schats R, McDonnell J, Lambalk CB.Ovarian volume and antral follicle count for the prediction of low and hyper responders with in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2007;5:9.
58. Jayaprakasan K, Hilwah N, Kendall NR, Hopkisson JF, Campbell BK, JohnsonI R, et al. Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment? Hum Reprod 2007;22:1925-31
59. Higgins RV, van Nagell JR, Woods CH, Thompson EA, Kryscio RJ.Interobserver variation in ovarian measurements using transvaginalsonography. Gynecol Oncol 1990;39:69-71. (Pubitemid 20378262)
60. Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Quantification of ovarian power Doppler signal with three-dimensional ultrasonography to predict response during in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:816-22. (Pubitemid 37206419)
61. Lass A, Silye R, Abrams DC, Krausz T, Hovatta O, Margara R, et al. Follicular density in ovarian biopsy of infertile women: Anovel method to assess ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1028-31. (Pubitemid 27271765)
62. Schmidt KL, Byskov AG, Andersen AN, Müller J, Andersen CY. Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1158-64. (Pubitemid 36740558)
63. Sharara FI, Scott RT. Assessment of ovarian reserve. Is there still a role for ovarian biopsy? First do no harm! Hum Reprod 2004;19:470-1. (Pubitemid 38344502)
64. Visser JA, de Jong FH, Laven JS, Themmen AP. anti-Müllerian hormone: Anew marker for ovarian function. Reproduction 2006;131:1-9. (Pubitemid 43230697)
65. Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace AM, Fleming R, McConnachie A. Nomogram for the decline in serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Apopulation study of 9,601 infertility patients. Fertil Steril 2011;95:736-41.
66. vanBeek RD, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, Laven JS, de Jong FH, Themmen AP, Hakvoort-Cammel FG, et al. anti-Mullerian hormone is a sensitive serum marker for gonadal function in women treated for Hodgkin'slymphoma during childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:3869-74. (Pubitemid 47607635)
67. Maheshwari A, Gibreel A, Bhattacharya S, Johnson NP. Dynamic tests of ovarianreserve: Asystematic review of diagnostic accuracy. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:717-34.
68. Creus M, Peñarrubia J, Fábregues F, Vidal E, Carmona F, Casamitjana R, et al. Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2341-6.
69. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, teVelde ER. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: A prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2002;77:328-36. (Pubitemid 34083557)