Impact of three-dimensional analysis of multidetector row computed tomography cholangioportography in operative planning for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 202, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 441-448

  Sasaki, Ryoko ^a   Kondo, Tadashi ^a   Oda, Tatsuya ^a   Murata, Soichiro ^a   Wakabayashi, Go ^b   Ohkohchi, Nobuhiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma; Cholangioportography; Multidetector row computed tomography; Operation; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BLOOD VESSEL; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; HUMAN; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING; BILE DUCT TUMOR; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT; LIVER RESECTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PORTAL VEIN; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; FEMALE; HEPATECTOMY; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PORTAL VEIN; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

EID: 84856397352     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: 18791883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.034     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, et al. Hepatic segmentectomywith caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 1990;14:535-44.
2. Launois B, Terblanche J, Lakehal M, et al. Proximal bile duct cancer: high resectability rate and 5-year survival. Ann Surg 1999;230:266-75. (Pubitemid 30191894)
3. Saldinger PF, Blumgart LH. Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a European and united States experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:111-4.
4. Ito F, Cho CS, Rikkers LF, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: current management. Ann Surg 2009;250:210-8.
5. Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, et al. Aggressive surgical approaches to hilar cholangiocarcinoma: hepatic or local resection? Surgery 1998; 123:131-6. (Pubitemid 28110073)
6. Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system. Ann Surg 1998;228:385-94. (Pubitemid 30191701)
7. Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, et al. Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 2003;238:73-83. (Pubitemid 38176410)
8. Jarnagin WR, Shoup M. Surgical management of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2004;24:189-99. (Pubitemid 38738347)
9. Silva MA, Tekin K, Aytekin F, et al. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma; a 10 year experience of a tertiary referral centre in the UK. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:533-9. (Pubitemid 40724095)
10. Ito F, Agni R, Rettammel RJ, et al. Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: concomitant liver resection decreases hepatic recurrence. Ann Surg 2008;248:273-9.
11. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, et al. Anatomic right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2006;243:28-32. (Pubitemid 43054051)
12. Hirano S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, et al. Treatment strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, with special reference to the limits of ductal resection in right-sided hepatectomies. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:429-33 (Pubitemid 47517209)
13. Shimizu H, Sawada S, Kimura F, et al. Clinical significance of biliary vascular anatomy of the right liver for hilar cholangiocarcinoma applied to left hemihepatectomy. Ann Surg 2009;249:435-9.
14. Uchida M, Ishibashi M, Tomita N, et al. Hilar and suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of 3D angiography and multiphase fusion images using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1572-7. (Pubitemid 43821837)
15. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Hong SS, et al. Biliary ductal evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: three-dimensional direct multi-detector row CT cholangiographic findings versus surgical and pathologic results - feasibility study. Radiology 2006;238:300-8. (Pubitemid 43010608)
16. Endo I, Shimada H, Sugita M, et al. Role of three-dimensional imaging in operative planning for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2007;142: 666-75. (Pubitemid 350018849)
17. Cho A, Asano T, Yamamoto H, et al. Relationship between right portal and biliary systems based on reclassification of the liver. Am J Surg 2007;193:1-4. (Pubitemid 44937175)
18. Couinaud C. Surgical Anatomy of the Liver Revisited. Paris; Personal publication; 1989.
19. Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;140: 170-7.
20. Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, et al. Surgical anatomy of the bile ducts at the hepatic hilum as applied to living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2004;239:82-6. (Pubitemid 38176376)
21. Kondo S, Hirano S, Ambo Y, et al. Forty consecutive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with no postoperative mortality and no positive ductal margins. Results of a prospective study. Ann Surg 2004; 240:95-101. (Pubitemid 38808240)
22. Cho A, Okazumi S, Yoshinaga Y, et al. Relationship between left biliary duct system and left portal vein: evaluation with three-dimensional portocholangiography. Radiology 2003;228:246-50. (Pubitemid 36736099)
23. Hünerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Ulmer C, et al. Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:853-8. (Pubitemid 37521654)
24. Choi JY, Kim MJ, Lee JM, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Role of preoperative Imaging with Sonography, MDCT, MRI, and direct Cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1448-57.
25. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-97. (Pubitemid 26043894)
26. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Múnera F. Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 2001;220:90-6. (Pubitemid 32577965)
27. Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. Cholangiography versus cholangioscopy for evaluation of longitudinal extension of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:25-32. (Pubitemid 41115045)
28. Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M, et al. Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2317-25. (Pubitemid 44349880)
29. Ahmetoǧlu A, Koşucu P, Kul S, et al. MDCT cholangiography with volume rendering for the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1327-32. (Pubitemid 44210596)
30. Denecke T, Degutyte E, Stelter L, et al. Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction: comparison with MRCP. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1719-26. (Pubitemid 44027373)
31. Cho ES, Park MS, Yu JS, et al. Biliary ductal involvement of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31: 72-8.
32. Ebata T, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y, et al. Pathological appraisal of lines of resection for bile duct carcinoma. Br J Surg 2002;89:1260-7. (Pubitemid 36002543)
33. Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, et al. The pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann Surg 1998;227:405-11. (Pubitemid 28131022)