Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook

Internet Research

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 57-74

  Baltar, Fabiola ^a   Brunet, Ignasi ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Hard to reach population; Sampling methods; Snowball sampling; social research methodology; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856390909     PISSN: 10662243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/10662241211199960     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. (2006), "Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook" in Golle, P. and Danezis, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Robinson College, Cambridge, pp. 36-58.
2. Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. (2001), "Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies" in Social Research Update, Vol. 33, pp. 1-5.
3. Back, M.D., Stopfer, J.M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S.C., Egloff, B. and Gosling, S.D. (2010), "Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization" in Psychological Science, Vol. 21, pp. 372-4.
4. Balden, W. (2008), "Can you trust the data you collect from an online survey?", American Marketing Association Webcast, available at: http//amaevents.webex.com/eco6001/event (accessed 14 June 2010).
5. Benfield, J.A. and Szlemko, W.J. (2006), "Internet-based data collection: promises and realities", Journal of Research Practice, Vol. 2, No. 2, available at: http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/30/51 (accessed 20 June 2010).
6. Bigge, R. (2006), "The cost of (anti-)social networks: identity, agency and neo-Luddites" in First Monday, Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 1-10.
7. Birch, D. and Young, M. (1997), "Financial services and the Internet - what does cyberspace mean for the financial services industry?" in Internet Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 120-8.
8. Boyd, D. (2008), "Facebook's privacy trainwreck: exposure, invasion, and social convergence" in Convergence, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 13-20.
9. Boyd, D. and Ellison, N. (2008), "Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship" in Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, pp. 210-30.
10. Boyd, D. and Hargittai, E. (2010), "Facebook privacy settings: who cares?" in First Monday, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 1-24.
11. Brickman-Bhutta, C. (2009), "Not by the book: Facebook as sampling frame", available at www.thearda.com/../Not%20by%20the%20Book%20-%20Bhutta.doc (accessed 10 November 2010).
12. Browne, K. (2005), "Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women" in International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 47-60.
13. Bums, A.C. and Bush, R.F. (2006), Marketing Research: Online Research Applications, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Cambiar (2006), "The online research industry: an update on current practices and trends", available at: www.gmi-mr.com/press/release (accessed 18 June 2010).
15. Cohen, P. (1990), Drugs as a Social Construct, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
16. Cook, C., Heath, F. and Thompson, R. (2000), "A meta-analysis of response rates in web or Internet-based surveys" in Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 821-37.
17. Coomber, R. (1997), "Using the Internet for survey research", Sociological Research Online, Vol. 2, No. 2, available on: www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html (accessed 5 May 2010).
18. Couper, M.P. (2000), "Web surveys, a review of issues and approaches" in Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 464-94.
19. Davidovich, U. and Uhr, H. (2006), "Qualitative research online: self-reported pros and cons of being chat-interviewed online with web cameras", General Online Research Conference GOR 2006, available at: http://gor. de/gor06/index.php (accessed 26 July 2011).
20. Duncan, D., White, J.B. and Nicholson, T. (2003), "Using Internet-based surveys to reach hidden populations: case of nonabusive illicit drug users" in American Journal of Health Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 208-18.
21. Dwyer, C., Starr, H. and Passerini, K. (2007), "Trust and privacy concerns within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace", American Conference on Information Systems Proceedings, available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2007/339 (accessed 27 July 2011).
22. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. (2007), "The benefits of Facebook 'friends': social capital and college students use of online social network sites", Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, Vol. 12, No. 4, available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html (accessed 8 May 2010).
23. Evans, J. and Mathur, A. (2005), "The value of online surveys" in Internet Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 195-219.
24. Fricker, R. and Schonlau, M. (2002), "Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: evidence from the literature" in Field Methods, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 347-67.
25. Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Torangeau, R. and Yan, T. (2005), "An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys" in Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 370-973.
26. Groves, R.M., Presser, S. and Dipko, S. (2004), "The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions" in Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 2-31.
27. Heckathorn, D. (1997), "Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations" in Social Problems, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 174-99.
28. Ilieva, J., Baron, S. and Healey, N.M. (2002), "Online surveys in marketing research: pros and cons" in International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 361-76, available at: http://elibrary.ru /item.asp?id=6241312 (accessed 26 July 2011).
29. Johnston, L. and Sabin, K. (2010), "Sampling hard-to-reach populations with respondent driven sampling" in Methodological Innovations Online, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 38-48.
30. Koo, M. and Skinner, H. (2005), "Challenges of Internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results", Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, available at: www.jmir.org/2005/1/e6/ (accessed 8 May 2011).
31. Kushin, M. and Kitchener, K. (2009), "Getting political on social network sites: exploring online political discourse on Facebook", First Monday, Vol. 14, No. 11, available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/giwrapbin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2645 (accessed 10 June 2011).
32. Magnani, R., Sabin, K., Saidel, T. and Heckathorn, D. (2005), "Sampling hard to reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance" in AIDS, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 67-72.
33. Maronick, T. (2009), "Role of the Internet in survey research: guidelines for researchers and experts", Journal of Global Business and Technology, available at: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5493/is_200904/ai_n32128065/ (accessed 16 October 2010).
34. Marpsat, M. and Razafindratsima, N. (2010), "Survey methods for hard-to-reach populations: introduction to the special issue" in Methodological Innovations Online, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 3-16.
35. Miller, P.G. and Sondelund, P. (2010), "Using the Internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: a review" in Addiction, Vol. 105, No. 9, pp. 1557-67.
36. Moskowitz, H.R. and Birgi, M. (2008), "Optimising the language of e-mail survey invitations" in International Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 491-510.
37. Muhib, F.B., Lin, L.S., Stueve, A., Miller, R.L., Ford, W.L., Johnson, W.D. and Smith, P.J. (2001), "A venue-based method for sampling hard-to-reach populations" in Public Health Reports, Vol. 116, pp. 216-22.
38. Rhodes, S.D., Hergenrather, K.C., Yee, L.J., Knipper, E., Wilkin, A.M. and Omli, M.R. (2007), "Characteristics of a sample of men who have sex with men, recruited from gay bars and Internet chat rooms, who report methamphetamine use" in AIDS Patient Care and STDs, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 575-83.
39. Salganik, M.J. and Heckathorn, D.D. (2004), "Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling" Stolzenberg, R. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, Vol. 34, Blackwell, Oxford.
40. Stanton, J.M. (1998), "An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet" in Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 709-25.
41. Van Meter, K. (1990), "Methodological and design issues: techniques for assessing the representatives of snowball samples" in NIDA Research Monograph, pp. 31-43.
42. Watters, J. and Biernacki, P. (1989), "Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations" in Social Problems, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 416-30.
43. Weiwu, Z., Johnson, T.J., Seltzer, T. and Bichard, S. (2010), "The revolution will be networked: the influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior" in Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 28, pp. 75-92.
44. Wilson, A. and Laskey, N. (2003), "Internet based marketing research: a serious alternative to traditional research methods?" in Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 79-84.
45. Witte, J.C., Amoroso, L.M. and Howard, P.E.N. (2000), "Research methodology - method and representation in Internet-based survey tools" in Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 18, pp. 179-95.
46. Wong, T. (2008), "Purposive and snowball sampling in the study of ethnic and mainstream community organizations", paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Manchester Hyatt, San Diego, CA, available at: www.allacademic.com/meta/p238387_index.html (accessed 3 March 2011).
47. Yardi, S. (2007), "Whispers in the classroom" in McPherson, T. (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 143-64.
48. Zhou, T. (2011), "Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective" in Internet Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 67-81.