Surveillance technology: An alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 212-219

  Zwijsen, Sandra A ^a   Depla, Marja F I A ^a   Niemeijer, Alistair R ^a   Francke, Anneke L ^a,b   Hertogh, Cees M P M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Nursing homes; Nursing staff; Physical; Restraint; Technology

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEMENTIA; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOME FOR THE AGED; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; NURSING; NURSING HOME; RADIOFREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING; SAFETY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HOMES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSING HOMES; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICE; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84856384312     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ATLAS.Ti Version 5.2, 2008. Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin.
2. Austin W., Lemermeyer G., Goldberg L., Bergum V., Johnson M.S. Moral distress in healthcare practice: the situation of nurses. HEC Forum 2005, 17(1):33-48.
3. Bloor M., Frankland J., Thomas M., Robson K. Focus Groups in Social Research 2001, SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
4. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2011, 3(2):77-101.
5. Capezuti E., Wagner L.M., Brush B.L., Boltz M., Renz S., Talerico K.A. Consequences of an intervention to reduce restrictive side rail use in nursing homes. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007, 55:334-341.
6. Chuang Y.H., Huang H.T. Nurses' feelings and thoughts about using physical restraints on hospitalized older patients. J. Clin. Nurs. 2007, 16(3):486-494.
7. Council of Europe European Convention on Human Rights 1950.
8. De Veer A.J., Francke A.L., de Kruif A., Bolle J.J. Restraining interventions. A stock-taking amongst nurses. Tijdschrift voor Verpleeghuisgeneeskunde 2007, 32(1):7-11. (in Dutch).
9. Engberg J., Castle N.G., McCaffrey D. Physical restraint initiation in nursing homes and subsequent resident health. Gerontologist 2008, 48(4):442-452.
10. Evans D., Wood J., Lambert L. A review of physical restraint minimization in the acute and residential care settings. J. Adv. Nurs. 2002, 40(6):616-625.
11. Evans D., Wood J., Lambert L. Patient injury and physical restraint devices: a systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003, 41(3):274-282.
12. General Assembly of the United Nations, 1948. Universal declaration of human rights.
13. Halfens R.J.G., Meijers J.M.M., Du Moulin M.F.M.T., van Nie N.C., Neyens J.C.L., Schols J.M.G.A. Report on the results of the national prevalence measurement on care issues 2010, Universiteit Maastricht, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Care and Nursing Science, Maastricht, pp. 81-108.
14. Hamers J.P., Huizing A.R. Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly?. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 2005, 38(1):19-25.
15. Health Inspectorate The Use of Domotics in Health Care Should Be More Careful 2009, IGZ, Den Haag, (in Dutch).
16. Karlsson S., Bucht G., Eriksson S., Sandman P.O. Factors relating to the use of physical restraints in geriatric care settings. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2001, 49(12):1722-1728.
17. Karlsson S., Bucht G., Rasmussen G., Sandman P.O. Restraint use in elder care: decision making among registered nurses. J. Clin. Nurs. 2000, 9:842-850.
18. Landau R., Auslander G.K., Werner S., Shoval N., Heinik J. Families' and professional caregivers' views of using advanced technology to track people with dementia. Qual. Health Res. 2010, 20(3):409-419.
19. Lauriks S., Osté J.P., Hertogh C.M.P.M., Dröes R.M. More Quality of Life Because of Domotics 2008, Gildeprint Drukkerijen B.V., Enschede, (in Dutch).
20. Legemaate J., Frederiks B.J.M., de Roode R.P. The Special Admission to Psychiatric Hospital Act in international perspective. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht 2007, 4:268-281. (in Dutch).
21. Mays N., Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000, 320(7226):50-52.
22. Moore K., Haralambous B. Barriers to reducing the use of restraints in residential elder care facilities. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007, 58(6):532-540.
23. Neufeld R.R., Libow L.S., Foley W.J., Dunbar J.M., Cohen C., Breuer B. Restraint reduction reduces serious injuries among nursing home residents. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1999, 47(10):1202-1207.
24. Niemeijer A.R., Frederiks B.J.N., Riphagen I.I., Legemaate J., Eefsting J., Hertogh C.M.P.M. Ethical and practical concerns of surveillance technologies in residential care for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: an overview of the literature. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2010, 4:1-14.
25. Patrick H. Autonomy, benefit and protection. How human rights can protect people with mental conditions or learning disabilities from unlawful deprivation of liberty. Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland 2008, 1-52.
26. Pope C., van R.P., Baker R. Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2002, 11(2):148-152.
27. Weiner C., Tabak N., Bergman R. Use of restraints on dementia patients: an ethical dilemma of a nursing staff in Israel. JONAS. Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2003, 5(4):87-93.
28. Whitehead L. Enhancing the quality of hermeneutic research: decision trail. J. Adv. Nurs. 2004, 45(5):512-518.
29. World Health Organization Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation 2005, WHO, Geneva.
30. Zwijsen S.A., Depla M.F., Niemeijer A.R., Francke A.L., Hertogh C.M. The concept of restraint in nursing home practice: a mixed-method study in nursing homes for people with dementia. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2011, 1-9.