A robust weakly compressible SPH method and its comparison with an incompressible SPH

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 939-956

  Shadloo, Mostafa Safdari ^a   Zainali, Amir ^a   Yildiz, Mehmet ^a   Suleman, Afzal ^b  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Airfoil flow; Bluff body; Meshless method; Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH); Square obstacle problem; Vortex shedding

Indexed keywords

AIRFOIL FLOWS; BLUFF BODY; MESHLESS METHOD; OBSTACLE PROBLEMS; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS;

AIRFOILS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HYDRODYNAMICS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; TRACTION (FRICTION); VORTEX SHEDDING;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 84856355250     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3267     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mueller TJ, Batill SM. Experimental studies of separation on a two-dimensional airfoil at low Reynolds number. AAIA Journal 1982; 20(4): 456-463.
2. Okjima A. Strouhal numbers of rectangular cylinders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1982; 123: 379-398.
3. Mehta UB, La Z. Starting vortex, separation bubbles and stall: a numerical study of laminar unsteady flow around an airfoil. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1975; 67: 227-256.
4. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ. Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics: theory and application to non spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1977; 181: 375-389.
5. Lucy LB. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. The Astronomical Journal 1977; 82(12): 1013-1024.
6. Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH. Computers and Structures 2007; 85(11-14): 879-890.
7. Monaghan JJ, Huppert HE, Worster MG. Solidification using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 206(2): 684-705.
8. Fang J, Owens RG, Tacher L, Parriaux A. A numerical study of the SPH method for simulating transient viscoelastic free surface flows. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 2006; 139(1-2): 68-84.
9. Monaghan JJ, Kocharyan A. SPH simulation of multi-phase flow. Computer Physics Communications 1995; 87(1-2): 225-235.
10. Shadloo MS, Yildiz M. Numerical modeling of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2011; DOI: 10.1002/nme.3149.
11. Rook RA, Yildiz M, Dost S.Modelling transient heat transfer using SPH and implicit time integration. Journal of Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B 2007; 51: 1-23.
12. Chorin AJ.Numerical solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Mathematics of Computation 1968; 22(104): 745-762.
13. Chorin AJ. On the convergence of discrete approximations to the Navier-Stokes equations. Mathematics of Computation 1969; 23(106): 341-353.
14. Cummins SJ, Rudman M. An SPH projection method. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 152(2): 584-607.
15. Shao S, Lo EYM. Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Advances in Water Resources 2003; 26(7): 787-800.
16. Pozorski J, Wawreńczuk A. Sph computation of incompressible viscous flows. Journal of Theoretical Applied Mechanics 2002; 40(4): 917-937.
17. Hu XY, Adams NA. An incompressible multi-phase SPH method. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 227(1): 264-278.
18. Nestor R, Basa M, Quinlan N. Moving boundary problems in the finite volume particle method. ERCOFTAC SIG SPHERIC IIIrd International workshop, Lausanne, Switzland, 2008; 109-114.
19. Xu R. 2010. An improved incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method and its application in free-surface Simulations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, U.K.
20. Xu R, Stansby P, Laurence D. Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach. Journal of Computational Physics 2009; 228(18): 6703-6725.
21. Shadloo MS, Zainali A, Sadek SH, Yildiz M. Improved incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for simulating flow around bluff bodies. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2011; 200(9-12): 1008-1020.
22. Morris JP, Fox PJ, Zhu Y. Modeling low Reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136(1): 214-226.
23. Issa R, Lee ES, Violeau D, Laurence DR. Incompressible separated flows simulations with the smoothed particle hydrodynamics gridless method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 47(10-11): 1101-1106.
24. Lee E-S, Moulinec C, Xuc R, Violeau D, Laurence D, Stansby P. Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227(18): 8417-8436.
25. Hughes JP, Graham DI. Comparison of incompressible and weakly-compressible SPH models for free-surface water flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010; 48(Extra Issue): 105-117.
26. Lee E-S, Violeau D, Issa R, Ploix S. Application of weakly compressible and truly compressible SPH to 3-D water collapse in waterworks. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010; 48(Extra Issue): 50-60.
27. Khayyer A, Gotoh H. On particle-based simulation of a dam break over a wet bed. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010; 48(2): 238-249.
28. Gesteira MG, Rogers BD, Violeau D, Grassa JM, Crespo AJC. Foreword: SPH for free-surface flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010; 48(Extra Issue): 3-5.
29. Liu MB, Liu GR. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2010; 17(1): 25-76.
30. Vila JP. Particle weighted methods and Smooth particle hydrodynamics. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 1999; 9(2): 161-209.
31. Bonet J, Lok TSL. Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamics formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics Engineering 1999; 180(1-2): 97-115.
32. Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics 2005; 68(8): 1703-1759.
33. Yildiz M, Rook RA, Suleman A. SPH with the multiple boundary tangent method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2009; 77(10): 1416-1438.
34. Delorme L, Colagrossi A, Souto-Iglesias A, Zamora-Rodriguez R, Botia-Vera E. A set of canonical problems in sloshing, Part I: Pressure field in forced roll-comparison between experimental results and SPH. Ocean Engineering 2009; 36(2): 168-178.
35. Monaghan JJ. SPH without a tensile instability. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 159(2): 290-311.
36. Gray JP, Monaghan JJ, Swift RP. SPH elastic dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 190(49-50): 6641-6662.