Relevance realization and the emerging framework in cognitive science

Journal of Logic and Computation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 79-99

  Vervaeke, John ^a   Lillicrap, Timothy P ^b   Richards, Blake A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

constraints; framework; opponent processing; relevance; self organization

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINTS; FRAMEWORK; OPPONENT PROCESSING; RELEVANCE; SELF-ORGANIZATION;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 84856351712     PISSN: 0955792X     EISSN: 1465363X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exp067     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. J. L. Austin. How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962.
2. L. Barsalou. Situated Conceptualization. In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, H. Cohen, and C. Lefebvre, eds, Chapter 28, pp. 619-650. Elsevier, 2005.
3. Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun. Scaling learning algorithms towards AI. In Large-Scale Kernel Machines, pp. 321-358. MIT Press, 2007.
4. C. Cherniak. Minimal Rationality. MIT Press, 1986.
5. D. Chiappe and J. Vervaeke. Fodor, cherniak, and the naturalization of rationality. Theory and Psychology, 7, 799-821, 1997.
6. D. L. Chiappe and A. Kukla. Context selection and the frame problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 529-530, 1996.
7. N. Chomsky. The Minimalist Program, 3rd edn. The MIT Press, 1997.
8. D. Dennett. The robot's dilema : The frame problem in artificial intelligence. In Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of AI, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., 1987.
9. K. Doya, K. Samejima, K. Katagiri, and M. Kawato. Multiple model-based reinforcement learning. Neural Computation, 14, 1347-1369, 2002.
10. K. Doya. Reinforcement learning in continuous time and space. Neural Computation, 12, 219-245, 2000.
11. J. Fodor. Psychological Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology. Random House, 1968.
12. J. Fodor. How the mind works : What we still don't know. Daedalus, 135, 86-94, 2006. (Pubitemid 44186491)
13. R. M. French. Subcognition and the limits of the Turing test. Mind, 99, 53-65, 1990.
14. P. Gärdenfors. Conceptual Spaces: The geometry of thought. MIT Press, 2000.
15. L. R. Gleitman and M. Liberman. An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Volume 1: Language, 2nd edn. MIT Press, 1995.
16. N. Goodman. Seven strictures on similarity. Bobbs-Merrill, 1972.
17. C. Green. Fodor, functions, physics and fantasyland : Is AI a Mickey Mouse discipline? Journal of Experimental Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 8, 95-106, 1996.
18. C. D. Green and J. Vervaeke. What Kind of an Explanation, if Any, is a Connectionist Net? pp. 201-208. Captus, 1996.
19. H. P. Grice. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, 1989.
20. G. Harman. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. MIT Press, 1988.
21. J. Haugeland. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. MIT Press, 1985.
22. G. Hinton and D. van Camp. Keeping neural networks simple by minimizing the description length of the weights. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual ACM Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 5-13. ACM Press, 1993.
23. G. E. Hinton, P. Dayan, B. J. Frey, and R. M. Neal. The "wake-sleep" algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science, 268, 1158-1161, 1995.
24. G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero, and Y.-W. Teh.Afast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18, 1527-1554, 2006. (Pubitemid 44024729)
25. G. E. Hinton and R. R. Salakhutdinov. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313, 504-507, 2006. (Pubitemid 44148451)
26. K. J. Holyoak. Problem Solving. An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Thinking, E. S. Edward and N. O. Daniel, eds, Chapter 8, 2nd edn, pp. 267-295. MIT Press, 1995.
27. R. M Klein and W. MacInnes. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-362, 1999.
28. W. Li and E. Todorov. Iterative linear quadratic regulator design for nonlinear biological movement systems. 1st International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, 1, 222-229, 2004.
29. D. Medin. Concepts and conceptual structures. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481, 1989.
30. D. Medin and L. Rips. Concepts and Categories: Memory, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison, eds, Chapter 3. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
31. R. Montague. Your Brain is (Almost) Perfect. Plume, 2006.
32. A. Newell and H. Simon. Human Problem Solving. Princeton University, 1972.
33. A. Newell and H. A. Simon. Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Mind Design II, J. Haugeland, ed., Chapter 4. MIT Press, 1997.
34. H. Putnam. Representation and Reality. MIT Press, 1991.
35. Z. Pylyshyn. Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science. MIT Press, 1984.
36. Z. W. Pylyshyn. The Robot'S Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1988.
37. W. Ramsey, S. P. Stich, and J. Garon. Connectionism, Eliminativism, and the Future of Folk Psychology, pp. 199-228. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.
38. D. E. Rumelhart and A. Ortony. The Representation of Knowledge in Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1977.
39. R. C. Schank and R. P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1977.
40. Y. P. Shimansky, T. Kang, and J. He. A novel model of motor learning capable of developing an optimal movement control law online from scratch. Biological Cybernetics, 90, 133-145, 2004. (Pubitemid 40877336)
41. D. J. Siegel. Toward and interpersonal neurobiology of the developing mind:attachment relationships, "mindsight" and neural integration. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 67-94, 2001. (Pubitemid 33666909)
42. R. S. Siegler and C. Shipley. Variation, Selection, and Cognitive Change. Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling, T. Simon and G. Halford, eds, Chapter 2, pp. 31-76. Erlbaum, 1995.
43. H. A. Simon. Reasoning in Human Affairs. Standford University Press, 1983.
44. E. Smith and D. Osherson. An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Volume 3: Thinking, 2nd edn. MIT Press, 1995.
45. P. Smolensky. On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-73, 1988.
46. P. Smolensky. Connectionism, Constituency, and the Language of Thought, pp. 201-227. Blackwell, 1991.
47. D. Sperber and D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cogniton, 2nd edn. Blackwell, 1995.
48. D. Sperber and D.Wilson. Fodor's frame problem and relevance theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 530-532, 1996.
49. S. Stich. The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation. MIT Press, 1993.
50. R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning. The MIT Press, 1998.
51. E. Thompson. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of the Mind. Belknap Publishing, 2007.
52. E. Todorov and M. I. Jordan. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1226-1235, 2002. (Pubitemid 35247183)
53. A. M. Turing. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460, 1950.
54. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.
55. V. N.Vapnik.An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 988-999, 1999.
56. F. Varela, E. T. Thompson, and E. Rosch. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. The MIT Press, 1991.
57. J. Vervaeke. The Naturalistic Imperative in Cognitive Science. PhD Thesis edition, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 1997.
58. R. Vilata and Y. Drissi. A perspective view and survey of meta-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 18, 77-95, 2002.
59. M. Wheeler. Reconstructing the Cognitive World. MIT Press, 2005.
60. D. H.Wolpert andW. G. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 67-82, 1997. (Pubitemid 127771019)