The effect of topical negative pressure on wound biofilms using an in vitro wound model

Wound Repair and Regeneration

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 83-90

  Ngo, Quan D ^a   Vickery, Karen ^b   Deva, Anand K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOFILM; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SILVER IMPREGNATION; VACUUM ASSISTED CLOSURE; WOUND;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOFILMS; HUMANS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; SILVER COMPOUNDS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84856344485     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00747.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Medina A, Scott PG, Ghahary A, Tredget EE,. Pathophysiology of chronic nonhealing wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005; 26: 306-319. (Pubitemid 41074514)
2. Dale J, Callam M, Ruckley C,. Chronic ulcers of the leg: a study of prevalence in a Scottish community. Health Bull (Melb) 1983; 41: 310-314.
3. Frykberg RG,. Epidemiology of the diabetic foot: ulcerations and amputations. Adv Wound Care 1999; 12: 139-141.
4. Stacey MC,. Preventing pressure ulcers. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 316. (Pubitemid 38477135)
5. Davies CE, Hill KE, Newcombe RG, Stephens P, Wilson MJ, Harding KG, Thomas DW,. A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs. Wound Rep Regen 2007; 15: 17-22. (Pubitemid 46146658)
6. James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini E, Secor P, Sestrich J, Costerton JW, Stewart PS,. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Rep Regen 2008; 16: 37-44.
7. Cloete TE,. Resistance mechanism of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2003; 51: 277-282. (Pubitemid 36695771)
8. De Beer D, Stoodley P, Roe F, Lewandowski Z,. Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994; 43: 1131-1138. (Pubitemid 24162411)
9. Hayward PG, Morrison WW,. Current concepts in wound dressings. Aust Prescriber 1996; 19: 11-13. (Pubitemid 26083505)
10. Moisidis E, Heath T, Boorer C, Ho K, Deva AK,. A prospective, blinded, randomised, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 917-922. (Pubitemid 40362106)
11. Ganong WF,. Review of medical physiology. 2001. New York: McGraw Hill.
12. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersbøll BK, Molin S,. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 2000; 146 (Pt 10): 2395-2407.
13. Yildiz FH, Liu XS, Heydorn A, Schoolnik GK,. Molecular analysis of rugosity in a Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor phase variant. Mol Microbiol 2004; 53: 497-515. (Pubitemid 38998171)
14. Klausen M, Heydorn A, Ragas P, Lambertsen L, Aaes-Jørgensen A, Molin S, Tolker-Nielsen T,. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants. Mol Microbiol 2003; 48: 1511-1524. (Pubitemid 36751058)
15. Hess C, Howard M, Attinger C,. A review of mechanical adjuncts in wound healing: hydrotherapy, ultrasound, negative pressure therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, and electrostimulation. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51: 210-218. (Pubitemid 36944492)
16. V.A.C. therapy Clinical Guidelines. 2010. San Antonio, TX: KCI.
17. KCI. V.A.C. granufoam silver dressing. 2008. San Antonio, TX: KCI.
18. Monzon M, Oteiza C, Leiva J, Amorena B,. Synergy of different antibiotic combinations in biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48: 793-801. (Pubitemid 33735315)
19. Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C, Read RR, Morck D, Buret A,. The Calgary biofilm device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 1771-1776. (Pubitemid 29235221)
20. Harkonen P, Salo S, Mattila-Sandholm T, Wirtanen G, Allison DG, Gilbert P,. Development of a simple in vitro test system for the disinfection of bacterial biofilms. Water Sci Technol 1999; 39: 219-225. (Pubitemid 29243606)
21. Goeres DM, Loetterie LR, Hamilton MA, Murga R., Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms. Microbiol-SGM 2005; 151: 757-762. (Pubitemid 40425011)
22. Hadi R, Vickery K, Deva A, Charlton T,. Biofilm removal by medical device cleaners: comparison of two bioreactor detection assays. J Hosp Infect 2010; 74: 160-167.
23. Sun Y, Dowd SE, Smith E, Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD,. In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model. Wound Rep Regen 2008; 16: 805-813.
24. Malic S, Hill KE, Hayes A, Percival SL, Thomas DW, Williams DW,. Detection and identification of specific bacteria in wound biofilms using peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA FISH). Microbiology 2009; 155 (Pt 8): 2603-2611.
25. Ma L, Conover M, Lu H, Parsek MR, Bayles K, Wozniak DJ,. Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5: e1000354.
26. Landis SJ,. Chronic wound infection and antimicrobial use. Adv Skin Wound Care 2008; 21: 531-540. quiz 541-2.
27. Burmølle M, Thomsen TR, Fazli M, Dige I, Christensen L, Homøe P, Tvede M, Nyvad B, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Moser C, Kirketerp-Møller K, Johansen HK, Høiby N, Jensen PØ, Sørensen SJ, Bjarnsholt T,. Biofilms in chronic infections-a matter of opportunity-monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010; 59: 324-336.
28. Korber DR, Lawrence JR, Hendry MJ,. Analysis of spatial variability within Mot+ and Mot- Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms using representative elements. Biofouling 1993; 7: 339-358. (Pubitemid 2032467)
29. Morykwas M, Morykwas MJ,. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 553-562. (Pubitemid 27251299)
30. Argenta L, Morykwas M,. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.[see comment]. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 563-576. discussion 577.
31. Weed T, Ratliff C, Drake D,. Quantifying bacterial bioburden during negative pressure wound therapy: does the wound VAC enhance bacterial clearance? Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52: 276-279.
32. Moues CM, Vos MC, van den, Bemd GJ, Stijnen T, Hovius SE,. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Rep Regen 2004; 12: 11-17. (Pubitemid 38249130)
33. Bockelmann U, Szewzyk U, Grohmann E,. A new enzymatic method for the detachment of particle associated soil bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 2003; 55: 201-211. (Pubitemid 37297659)
34. Lindsay D, von, Holy A,. Bacterial biofilms within the clinical setting: what healthcare professionals should know. J Hosp Infect 2006; 64: 313-325. (Pubitemid 44661034)
35. Parsek MR, Singh PK,. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol 2003; 57: 677-701. (Pubitemid 37392958)
36. DeVries TA, Hamilton MA,. Estimating the antimicrobial log reduction: part 1. Quantitative assays. Quant Microbiol 1999; 1: 29-45.
37. Bell KY, Cutter CN, Sumner SS,. Reduction of foodborne micro-organisms on beef carcass tissue using acetic acid, sodiu bicarbonate, and hydrogen peroxide spray washes. Food Microbiol 1997; 14: 439-448. (Pubitemid 27471690)
38. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM,. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 1995; 49: 711-745.
39. Davey ME, O'Toole GA,. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2000; 64: 847-867. (Pubitemid 32475933)
40. Kraigsley A, Ronney PD, Finkel SE, editors. Hydrodynamic influences on biofilm formation and growth. Available at: URL, 2010.
41. Percival SL, Bowler PG, Russell D,. Bacterial resistance to silver in wound care. J Hosp Infect 2005; 60: 1-7. (Pubitemid 40485843)
42. Ip M, Lui SL, Chau SS, Lung I, Burd A., The prevalence of resistance to silver in a burns unit. J Hosp Infect 2006; 63: 342-344. (Pubitemid 43812191)