Discourse-centric learning analytics

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 23-33

  De Liddo, Anna ^a   Shum, Simon Buckingham ^a   Quinto, Ivana ^a,b   Bachler, Michelle ^a   Cannavacciuolo, Lorella ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Discourse analysis; Discourse analytics; Learning analytics; Sensemaking; Social network analysis; Web semantics

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; DISCOURSE ANALYTICS; LEARNING ANALYTICS; SENSEMAKING; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; WEB SEMANTICS;

QUALITY CONTROL; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WORLD WIDE WEB;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84856342879     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2090116.2090120     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Mercer, N. 2004. Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 1(2), 137-168.
2. Gilbert, G.N., Mulkay, M. 1984. Opening pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Mercer, N. 2000. Words and Minds. London, Routledge.
4. Ferguson, R. 2009. The Construction of Shared Knowledge through Asynchronous Dialogue. PhD thesis, The Open University. Chapter 2. pp.44-51. http://oro.open.ac.uk.
5. Walton, D. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: NJ.
6. Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F. 2010. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: CUP.
7. Kuntz, W., Rittel, H. 1970. Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Working Paper No. 131. Institute of Urban and Regional Development. U. California at Berkeley.
8. Conklin, J., Begeman, M. L. 1988. gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6 (4), 303-331.
9. Klein, M., Iandoli, L. 2008. Supporting Collaborative Deliberation Using a Large-Scale Argumentation System: The MIT Collaboratorium. Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing. Conference on Online Deliberation. U.C. Berkeley, 26-29 June, 2008.
10. Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S., Carr, C. Eds. 2003. Visualizing Argumentation. Springer-Verlag: London.
11. ODET 2010. Online Deliberation: Emerging Technologies Workshop, Fourth Int. Conf. on Online Deliberation (Leeds, 30 June-2 July, 2010), http://olnet.org/odet2010.
12. Andriessen, J. Baker, M., Suthers, D. 2006. Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Kluwer.
13. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. 1994. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-83.
14. Buckingham Shum, S. 2006. Sensemaking on the Pragmatic Web: A Hypermedia Discourse Perspective. Proc. PragWeb'06: 1st International Conference on the Pragmatic Web. ACM Digital Library: http://dl.acm.org.
15. Buckingham Shum, S. 2008. Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation. In 2nd Int. Conference on Computational Models of Argument, Toulouse. IOS Press: Amsterdam.
16. De Liddo, A., Buckingham Shum, S. 2010. Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence. In ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference (CSCW2010): Workshop on Collective Intelligence in Organizations, Feb 6-10, 2010, GA. http://oro.open.ac.uk/19554.
17. De Liddo, A. 2010. From Open Content to Open Thinking. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (Ed-Media 2010), 29 Jun, Toronto, Canada. Available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/ 22283/.
18. Borgatti, S. Everett, M., Freeman, L. 2002. UCINET 6.0 for Windows, MA: Analytic Technologies. http://www.analytictechn.com.
19. Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Rodrigues, E.M., Barash, V., Dunne, C., Capone, T., Perer, A., Gleave, E. 2009. Analyzing (Social Media) Networks with NodeXL. In C&T '09: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Springer.
20. Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R., Jeong, H. 2000. Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web. Physica A: Statistical Mechanism and its Applications, 281(1-4), 69-77.
21. Wasserman, S. Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Ananlysis. Cambridge: CUP.
22. Sándor, A. 2007. Modeling metadiscourse conveying the author's rhetorical strategy in biomedical research abstracts. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 200(2):97- 109.