AAT - A tool for accessing and analysing students' behaviour data in learning systems

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 174-179

  Graf, Sabine ^a   Ives, Cindy ^a   Rahman, Nazim ^a   Ferri, Arnold ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Academic analytics; Data extraction and analysis; Learning systems

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ANALYTICS; DATA EXTRACTION; EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS; LEARNING MATERIALS; LEARNING PROCESS; LEARNING RESOURCE; LIMITED INFORMATION; LOG DATA; ONLINE COURSE; ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT;

DESIGN; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84856341035     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2090116.2090145     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Campbell, J.P., DeBlois, P.B., and Oblinger, D.G. 2007. Academic Analytics: A New Tool for a New Era. EDUCAUSE Review 42, 4 (Jul./Aug. 2007), 40-57.
2. Finkelstein, A.B.A., Masi, A.C., and Winer, L.R. 2004. My LMS Gets 1, 000, 000 Hits a Day: Supporting Your Strategic IT Decisions with Log Analysis Data from your LMS. Presentation at the EDUCAUSE Conference, Denver CO, October, 2004.
3. Orcutt, J.M. 2010. Using Enterprise Reporting to Assess Instructor Involvement in Online Classes. Presentation at Pearson CiTE Conference, Denver CO, April, 2010.
4. Romero, C., Ventura. S., and Garcia, E. 2008. Data Mining in Course Management Systems: Moodle Case Study and Tutorial. Computers and Education 51 (2008), 368-384. (Pubitemid 351680352)
5. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. 1999. Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 2-3 (Spring 1999), 87-105. (Pubitemid 129588559)
6. Moodle, 2011.http://moodle.org/(accessed on July 31, 2011).
7. Morris, L.V. and Finegan, C.L. 2008. Best Practices in Predicting and Encouraging Student Persistence and Achievement Online. Journal of College Student Retention 10, 1 (2008), 55-64.
8. Reigeluth, C.M. and Frick, T.W. 1999. Formative Research: A Methodology for Creating and Improving Design Theories. In Instructional Design Theories and Models, Reigeluth, C.M., Ed., Vol. 1, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 633-651.
9. Smith, P.L. and Ragan, T.J. 1999. Instructional Design (2nd ed.). Merrill, Upper Saddle River NJ.
10. Tessmer, M. 1998. Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. Kogan Page, London.
11. Reigeluth, C.M. and Carr-Chellman, A.A (eds.). 2009. Instructional-design Theories and Models: Volume III. Building a Common Knowledge Base. Routledge, New York.
12. Baker, E.L. and Herman, J.L. 2003. A Distributed Evaluation Model. In Evaluating Educational Technology, Gaertel, G., Means, B., Eds., Teachers College Press, New York, 95-119.
13. Mazza, R. and Milani, C. 2008. Exploring usage analysis in learning systems: gaining insights from visualisations. In Proceedings of the AIED Workshop on Usage Analysis in Learning Systems at the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2005), Springer.
14. Graf, S., Kinshuk, and Liu, T.-C. 2009. Supporting Teachers in Identifying Students' Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems: An Automatic Student Modelling Approach. Educational Technology & Society 12, 4 (Oct. 2009), 3-14.
15. Sakai, 2011. http://www.sakaiproject.org/portal (accessed on July 31, 2011).
16. Desire2Learn, 2011. http://www.desire2learn.com/(accessed on July 31, 2011).
17. Drupal, 2011. http://drupal.org/(accessed on July 31, 2011).