Using airborne scanning laser altimetry (LiDAR) to estimate surface connectivity of floodplain water bodies

River Research and Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 258-267

  Negishi, J N ^a   Sagawa, S ^a   Sanada, S ^a   Kume, M ^a   Ohmori, T ^a   Miyashita, T ^a   Kayaba, Y ^a  

^a PUBLIC WORKS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Flood frequency; Inundation; Predictive models; Remotely sensed data; Unionid mussels

Indexed keywords

ALTIMETRY; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FLOODPLAIN; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; LIDAR; MOLLUSC; REMOTE SENSING; TEMPERATURE; WATER LEVEL;

CHUBU; HONSHU; JAPAN; KISO RIVER;

UNIONIDAE;

EID: 84856299088     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1442     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahearn DS, Viers JH, Mount JF, Dahlgren RA.2006. Priming the productivity pump: flood pulse driven trends in suspended algal biomass distribution across a restored floodplain. Freshwater Biology51:1417-1433.
2. Amoros C, Roux AL, Reygobellet JL, Bravard J, Pautou G.1987.A method of applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management1:17-36.
3. Baranyi C, Hein T, Holarek C, Keckeis S, Schiemer F.2002. Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system: effects of hydrology. Freshwater Biology47:473-482.
4. Benke AC, Chaubey I, Ward GM, Dunn EL.2000. Flood pulse dynamics of an unregulated river floodplain in the Southeastern U.S. coast plain. Ecology81:2730-2741.
5. Bornette G, Amoros C, Lamouroux N.1998. Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: the role of connectivity. Freshwater Biology39:267-283.
6. Cobby DM, Mason DC, Davenport IJ.2001. Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modeling. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing56:121-138.
7. Denda M, Kayaba Y, Shimatani Y.1999.A method to estimate flooding frequency of backwaters in the Chikuma River, Nagano central Japan. Ecology and Civil Engineering2:63-72 (in Japanese with English abstract).
8. Ferreira LV, Stohlgren TJ.1999. Effects of river level fluctuation on plant species richness, diversity, and distribution in a floodplain forest in Central Amazonia. Oecologia120:582-587.
9. Geest GJV, Coops H, Roijackers RMM, Buijse AD, Scheffer M.2005. Succession of aquatic vegetation driven by reduced water-level fluctuations in floodplain lakes. Journal of Applied Ecology42:251-260.
10. Gergel SE, Dixon MD, Turner MG.2002. Consequences of human-altered floods: levees, floods, and floodplain forests along the Wisconsin River. Ecological Applications12:1755-1770.
11. Hein T, Baranyi C, Reckendorfer W, Schiemer F.2004. The impact of surface water exchange on the nutrient and particle dynamics in side-arms along the River Danube, Austria. Science of the Total Environment328:207-218.
12. Hopkinson C, Chasmer LE, Sass G, Creed IF, Sitar M, Kalbfleisch W, Treitz P.2005. Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in a boreal wetland environment. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing31:191-206.
13. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE.1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Dodge DP (ed). Can. Spec. Publ. Fish Aquat. Sci. 106. 110-127.
14. Lasne E, Lek S, Laffaille P.2007. Patterns in fish assemblages in the Loire floodplain: the role of hydrological connectivity and implications for conservation. Biological Conservation139:258-268.
15. Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ.2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience52:19-30.
16. Lewis WM, Hamilton SK, Lasi MA, Rodriguez M, Saunders JF.2000. Ecological determinism on the Orinoco floodplain. BioScience50:681-692.
17. Lim K, Treitz P, Wulder M, St-Onge B, Flood M.2003. LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Progress in Physical Geography27:88-106.
18. Luef B, Aspetsberger F, Hein T, Huber F, Peduzzi P.2007. Impact of hydrology on free-living and particle-associated microorganisms in a river floodplain system (Danube, Austria). Freshwater Biology5:1043-1057.
19. Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KS, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, Thompson FG.2004. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. BioScience54:321-330.
20. Marston RA, Girel J, Pautou G, Piegay H, Bravard J, Arneson C.1995. Channel metamorphosis, floodplain disturbance, and vegetation development: Ain River, France. Geomorphology13:121-131.
21. Miranda LE.2005. Fish assemblages in oxbow lakes relative to connectivity with the Mississippi River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society134:1480-1489.
22. Negishi JN, Kayaba Y, Sagawa S.2008a. Environmental degradation of floodplains and endangered freshwater mussels. Civil Engineering Journal50:44-45 (in Japanese).
23. Negishi JN, Kayaba Y, Tsukahara K, Miwa Y.2008b. Towards conservation and restoration of habitats for freshwater mussels (Unionoida). Ecology and Civil Engineering11:195-211 (in Japanese with English abstract).
24. Paidere J, Gruberts D, Škunte A, Druvietis I.2007. Impact of two different flood pulses on planktonic communities of the largest floodplain lakes of the Daugava River (Latvia). Hydrobiologia592:303-314.
25. R Development Core Team.2008.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.
26. Reckendorfer W, Barany C, Funk A, Schiemer F.2006. Floodplain restoration by reinforcing hydrological connectivity: expected effects on aquatic mollusk communities. Journal of Applied Ecology43:474-484.
27. Richardot-coulet M, Castella E, Castella C.1987. Classification and succession of former channels of the French upper Rhone alluvial plain using mollusca. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management1:111-127.
28. Rosso PH, Ustin SL, Hastings A.2006. Use of lidar to study changes associated with Spartina invasion in San Francisco Bay marshes. Remote Sensing of Environment100:295-306.
29. Schemel LE, Sommer TR, Müller-Solger AB, Harrell WC.2004. Hydrologic variability, water chemistry, and phytoplankton biomass in a large floodplain of the Sacramento River, CA, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia513:129-139.
30. Shin N, Nakamura F.2005. Effects of fluvial geomorphology on riparian tree species in Rekifune River, northern Japan. Plant Ecology178:15-28.
31. Tockner K, Bretschko G.1996. Spatial distribution of particle organic matter (POM) and benthic invertebrates in a river-floodplain transect (Danube, Austria): importance of hydrological connectivity. Archive fur Hydrobiologie Supplement115(1):11-27.
32. Tockner K, Schiemer F.1997. Ecological aspects of the restoration strategy for a river-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters6:321-329.
33. Tockner K, Stanford JA.2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation29:308-330.
34. Tockner K, Ward JV.1998. Conservation by restoration: the management concept for a river-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems8:71-86.
35. Van den Brink FWB, Van Katwijket MM, Van der Velde GV.1994. Impact of hydrology on phyto- and zooplankton community composition in floodplain lakes along the Lower Rhine and Meuse. Journal of Plankton Research16:351-373.