Antibiotic activity against Xanthomonas Gardneri and protection of tomato plants by chitosan

Journal of Plant Pathology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 337-344

  Coqueiro, D S O ^a   di Piero, R M ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bacterial spot; Chitosan; Induced resistance; Peroxidase

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; XANTHOMONAS; XANTHOMONAS GARDNERI;

EID: 84856273179     PISSN: 11254653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abd-El-Kareem F., El-Mougy N.S., El-Gamal N.G., Fotouh Y.O., 2006. Use of chitin and chitosan against tomato root rot disease under greenhouse conditions. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 2: 147-152.
2. Badawy M.E.I., Rabez E.I., 2008. Potential of the biopolymer chitosan with different molecular weights to control postharvest gray mold of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biology Technology 51: 110-117.
3. Benhamou N., 1996. Elicitor-induced plant defence pathways. Trends in Plant Science 1: 233-240.
4. Ben-Shalom N., Ardi R., Pinto R., Aki C., Fallik E., 2003. Controlling gray mould caused by Botrytis cinerea in cucumber plants by means of chitosan. Crop Protection 22: 285-290.
5. Bhaskara Reddy M.V., Arul J., Angers P., Couture L., 1999. Chitosan treatment of wheat seeds induces resistance to Fusarium graminearum and improves seed quality. Journal Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47: 1208-1216.
6. Bradford M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
7. Cavalcanti F.R., Resende M.L.V., Carvalho C.P.S., Silveira J.A.G., Oliveira J.T.A., 2007. An aqueous suspension of Crinipellis perniciosa mycelium activates tomato defence responses against Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Crop Protection 26: 729-738.
8. Chen H.-P., Xu L.L., 2005. Isolation and characterization of a novel chitosan-binding protein from non-heading Chinese cabbage leaves. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 47: 452-456.
9. Chien P., Sheu F., Lin H., 2007. Coating citrus (Murcott tan-gor) fruit with low molecular weight chitosan increases postharvest quality and shelf life. Food Chemistry 100: 1160-1164.
10. Delannoy E., Jalloul A., Assigbetsé K., Marmey P., Geiger J.P., Lherminier J., Daniel J.F., Martinez C., Nicole M., 2003. Activity of class iii peroxidases in the defense of cotton to bacterial blight. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 16: 1030-1038.
11. Devlieghere Vermeulen S., Debevere J., 2004. Chitosan: antimicrobial activity, interactions with food components and applicability as a coating on fruit and vegetables. Food Microbiology 21: 703-714.
12. Di Piero R.M., Garda M.V., 2008. Quitosana reduz a severidade da antracnose e aumenta a atividade de glucanase em feijoeiro-comum. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43: 1121-1128.
13. Duval A.M.Q., 2003. Diversidade de Xanthomonas spp. Associadas a mancha-bacteriana em tomateiro para processamento industrial no Brasil. Ph.D. Thesis, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz Queiroz, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
14. El-Ghaouth A., Arul J., Grenier J., Asselin A., 1992. Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits. Phytopathology 82: 398-402.
15. Falcón A., Cabrera J.C., Costales D., Ramírez M.A., Cabrera G., Toledo V., Martínez-Téllez M.A., 2008. The effect of size and acetylation degree of chitosan derivatives on tobacco plant protection against Phytophthora parasitica nicotianae. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 24: 103-112.
16. Faoro F., Maffi D., Cantu D., Iriti M., 2008. Chemical-induced resistance against powdery mildew in barley: the effects of chitosan and benzothiadiazole. Biological Control 53: 387-401.
17. Ferreira D.F., 2003. SISVAR, 4.3 (Build 45). Universidade Federal de Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
18. Guo Z., Chen R., Xing R., Liu S., Yu H., Wang P., Li C., Li P., 2006. Novel derivatives of chitosan and their antifungal activities in vitro. Carbohydrate Research 341: 351-354.
19. Hadwiger L.A., Backman J.M., 1980. Chitosan as a component of pea-Fusarium solani interactions. Plant Physiology 66: 205-211.
20. Hammerschmidt R., Nuckles E.M., Kuc J., 1982. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiological Plant Pathology 20: 73-82.
21. Hernández-Lauzardo A.N., Bautista-Baños S., Velázquez-del Valle M.G., Méndez-Montealvo M.G., Sánchez-Rivera M.M., Bello-Pérez L.A., 2008. Antifungal effects of chitosan with different molecular weights on in vitro development of Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.:Fr.) Vuill. Carbohydrate Polymers 73: 541-547.
22. Kurozawa C., Pavan M.A., 2005. Doenças do Tomateiro. In: Kimati H., Amorim L., Rezende J.A.M., Bergamin Filho A., Camargo L.E.A. (eds). Manual de Fitopatologia: Doenças das Plantas Cultivadas, pp. 607-26. Agronômica Ceres, São Paulo, Brazil.
23. Iriti M., Faoro F., 2009. Chitosan as a MAMP, searching for a PRR. Plant Signaling and Behavior 4: 66-68.
24. Leboeuf J., Cuppels D., Dick J., Pitblado R., Loewen S., Celetti M., 2005. Bacterial diseases of tomato: bacterial spot, bacterial speck, bacterial canker. Online [http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca].
25. Lever M., 1972. A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Analytical Biochemistry 47: 273-279.
26. Li B., Wang X., Chen R., Huangfu W., Xie G., 2008. Antibacterial activity of chitosan solution against Xanthomonas pathogenic bacteria isolated from Euphorbia pulcherrima. Carbohydrate Polymers 72: 287-292.
27. Liu J., Tian S., Meng X., Xu Y., 2007. Effects of chitosan on control of postharvest diseases and physiological responses of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 44: 300-306.
28. Lizama-Uc G., Estrada-Mota I.A., Caamal-Chan G., Souza-Perera R., Oropeza-Salín C., Islas-Floresa I., Zúñiga-Aguilar J.J., 2007. Chitosan activates a MAP-kinase pathway and modifies abundance of defense-related transcripts in calli of Cocos nucifera L. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 60: 130-141.
29. Mello S.C., Takatsu A., Lopes C.A., 1997. Escala diagramática para avaliação da mancha-bacteriana do tomateiro. Fitopatologia Brasileira 22: 447-448.
30. Patel M.P., Patel R.R., Patel J.K., 2010. Chitosan mediated targeted drug delivery system: a review. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 13: 536-557.
31. Rabea E.I., Badawy M.E.I., Steurbaut W., Stevens C.V., 2009. In vitro assessment of N-(benzyl) chitosan derivatives against some plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi. European Polymer Journal 45: 237-245.
32. Rodrigues A.A.C., Bezerra-Neto E., Coelho R.S.B., 2006. Indução de resistência a Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Tracheiphilum em caupi: eficiência de indutores abióticos e atividade enzimática elicitada. Fitopatologia Brasileira 31: 492-499.
33. Schneider S., Ullrich W.R., 1994. Differential induction of resistance and enhanced enzyme activities in cucumber and tobacco caused by treatment with various abiotic and biotic inducers. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 45: 291-304.
34. Silva R.F., Pascholati S.F., Bedendo I.P., 2008. Indução de resistência em plantas de berinjela por Lentinula edodes e Agaricus blazei contra Ralstonia solanacearum: aspectos bioquímicos e biomassa vegetal. Summa Phytopathologica 34: 137-144.
35. Silva-Lobo V.L., Giordano L.B., Lopes C.A., 2005. Herança da resistência à mancha-bacteriana em tomateiro. Fitopatologia Brasileira 30: 343-349.
36. Statsoft, 1999. Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, USA. Online [http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca]
37. Versalovic J., Schneider M., De Bruijn F.J., Lupski J.R., 1994. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods in Molecular and Cellular Biology 5: 25-40.
38. Warner J., 2003. Crop Protection. Ontario Horticultural Crops Research and Services Comittee. Annual Report - Tomato. Online [http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca]
39. Yafei C., Yong Z., Xiaoming Z., Peng G., Hailong A., Yuguang D., Yingrong H., Hui L., Yuhong Z., 2009. Functions of oligochitosan induced protein kinase in Tobacco mosaic virus resistance and pathogenesis related proteins in tobacco. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 47: 724-731.
40. Yakovlev G.I., Mitkevich V.A., Struminskaya N.K., Varlamov V.P., Makarov A.A., 2007. Low molecular weight chitosan is an efficient inhibitor of ribonucleases. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 357: 584-588.
41. Zheng L.Y., Zhu J.F., 2003. Study on antimicrobial activity of chitosan with different molecular weights. Carbohydrate Polymers 54: 527-530.