Perceived size change induced by audiovisual temporal delays

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 216, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 457-462

  Jaekl, Philip ^a   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^a,b   Harris, Laurence R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audiovisual integration; Distance perception; Size perception; Size distance invariance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION; AUDITORY MEMORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; VISUAL MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856267576     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2948-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433-436 (Pubitemid 127582520)
2. Cappe C, Thut G, Romei V, Murray MM (2009) Selective integration of auditory-visual looming cues by humans. Neuropsychologia 47:1045-1052
3. Epstein W, Park J, Casey A (1961) The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. Psychol Bull 58:491-514
4. Gallace A, Spence C (2006) Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size. Percept Psychophys 68:1191-1203
5. Gilinsky AS (1951) Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychol Rev 58:460-482
6. Gilinsky AS (1955) The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. Am J Psychol 68:173-192
7. Gregory RL (1997) Eye and brain. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
8. Harris LR, Harrar V, Jaekl P, Kopinska A (2010) Mechanisms of simultaneity constancy. In: Nijhawan R, Khurana B (eds) Space and time in perception and action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Hershenson M (ed) (1989) The moon illusion. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, New Jersey
10. Kaufman L, Kaufman JH, Noble R, Edlund S, Bai S, King T (2006) Perceptual distance and the constancy of size and stereoscopic depth. Spat Vis 19:439-457 (Pubitemid 44671012)
11. Kaufman L, Vassiliades V, Noble R, Alexander R, Kaufman J, Edlund S (2007) Perceptual distance and the moon illusion. Spat Vis 20:155-175
12. Kilpatrick FP, Ittelson WH (1953) The size-distance invariance hypothesis. Psych Rev 60:223-231
13. King AJ (2005) Multisensory integration: strategies for synchronization. Curr Biol 15:R339-R341 (Pubitemid 40689393)
14. Kitagawa N, Ichihara S (2002) Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature 416:172-174 (Pubitemid 34246473)
15. Kopinska A, Harris LR (2004) Simultaneity constancy. Perception 33:1049-1060 (Pubitemid 39558194)
16. Meredith MA, Nemitz JW, Stein BE (1987) Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. J Neurosci 7:3215-3229
17. Parise CV, Spence C (2009) When birds of a feather flock together: synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS One 4:e5664
18. Ross HE, Plug C (2002) The mystery of the moon illusion: exploring size perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford
19. Schlosberg H (1950) A note on depth perception, size constancy, and related topics. Psychol Rev 57:314-317
20. Shams L, Kim R (2010) Crossmodal influences on visual perception. Phys Life Rev 7:269-284
21. Spence C, Squire S (2003) Multisensory integration: maintaining the perception of synchrony. Curr Bio 13:R519-R521 (Pubitemid 36815250)
22. Valjamae A, Soto-Faraco S (2008) Filling-in visual motion with sounds. Acta Psychol (Amst) 129:249-254
23. Vishwanath D, Blaser E (2010) Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance. J Vis 10:1-16
24. Watson AB, Pelli DG (1983) QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 33:113-120