CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India

Energy Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2012, Pages 450-460

  Jayanthakumaran, Kankesu ^a   Verma, Reetu ^a   Liu, Ying ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

CO 2 emissions; Energy consumption; Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC)

Indexed keywords

BOUNDS TESTING; COINTEGRATION; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; INFORMAL ECONOMY; INTERNATIONAL MARKETS; LOW ENERGIES; MICRO-ENTERPRISES; PER CAPITA INCOME; STRUCTURAL BREAK; STRUCTURAL CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMICS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FOSSIL FUELS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY USE; FOSSIL FUEL; INCOME; KUZNETS CURVE;

CHINA; INDIA;

EID: 84856267036     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. 2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 2007, 35(10):4772-4778.
2. Antweiler W., Copeland B., Taylor M.S. Is free trade good for the environment?. American Economic Review 2001, 91(4):877-908.
3. 2 emissions using province-level information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2008, 55(3):229-247.
4. Bahmani-Oskooee M., Nasir A.B.M. ARDL approach to test the productivity bias hypothesis. Review of Development Economics 2004, 8(3):483-488.
5. Banerjee A., Dolado J.J., Mestre R. Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1998, 19(3):267-283.
6. Cole M.A., Elliott R.J.R. Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labour and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 46(3):363-383.
7. Davis, S.J. and Caldeira, K., 2010. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, accessed on 17 August 2011. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/23/0906974107.full.pdf+html?with-ds=yes.
8. De Bruyn S.M. Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions. Environment and Development Economics 1998, 2(4):485-503.
9. Dean J.M. Does trade liberalisation harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics 2002, 35(4):819-842.
10. Dean, J.M. and Lovely, M.E., 2008. Trade growth, production fragmentation, and China's environment. NBER Working Paper, No. 13860.
11. Diener B.J., Frank W.P. The China-India challenge: a comparison of causes and effects of global warming. The International Business and Economics Research Journal 2010, 9(3):21-26.
12. Dietzenbacher E., Mukhopadhyay K. An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: towards a green Leontief Paradox?. Environmental and Resource Economics 2007, 36(4):427-449.
13. Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics 2004, 49(4):431-455.
14. Ghoshal, T. and Bhattacharyya, R., 2008. State Level Carbon Eemissions of India 1980-2000. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 4(1): 1-47, at: accessed 9 December 2010. http://journal.ciiss.net/index.php/ciiss/article/view/60/54.
15. Grossman, G. and Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 3194, NBER, Cambridge.
16. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2009, 37(3):1156-1164.
17. Hill C.W.L. International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace 2011, McGraw-Hill, Irwin, USA.
18. Hu C., Huang X.J. Characteristics of carbon emission in China and analysis on its cause. China Population, Resources and Environment 2008, 18(3):38-42.
19. 2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5167-5172.
20. Kahrl F., Roland-Holst D. Growth and structural change in China's energy economy. Energy 2009, 30:1-10.
21. Khanna M., Zilberman D. Adoption of energy efficient technologies and carbon abatement: the electricity generating sector in India. Energy Economics 2001, 23(6):637-658.
22. Kraft J., Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development 1978, 3(2):401-403.
23. Kremers J.J., Erksson N.R., Dolado J.J. The power of cointegration tests. Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1992, 54(3):325-347.
24. Kunitomo N. Tests of unit roots and cointegration hypotheses in econometric models. Japanese Economic Review 1996, 47(1):79-109.
25. 2 emissions in Canada: where's the EKC?. Ecological Economics 2006, 57(2):229-238.
26. Lee J., Strazicich M. Minimum lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics 2003, 85(4):1082-1089.
27. Lee, J. and Strazicich, M., 2004. Minimum lagrange multiplier unit root test with one structural break. Working paper, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, USA.
28. 2 emissions: a CGE model-based analysis. Energy Efficiency 2009, 2(3):243-262.
29. Liu, Y., 2009. Trade, growth, and the environment nexus: the experience of China, 1990-2007. MEc thesis, University of Wollongong.
30. Mukhopadhyay K. Air pollution and income distribution in India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 2008, 15(1):35-64.
31. Mukhopadhyay K., Chakraborty D. Environmental impacts of trade in India. The International Trade Journal 2005, 19(2):135-163.
32. Mukhopadhyay K., Chakraborty D. Is liberalisation of trade good for the environment? Evidence from India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 2005, 12(1):109-135.
33. Narayan P.K., Singh B. The electricity consumption and GDP nexus for the Fiji Islands. Energy Economics 2007, 29(6):1141-1150.
34. Perkins R. Globalizing corporate environmentalism? convergence and heterogeneity in Indian industry. Comparative International Development 2007, 42(3/4):279-309.
35. Perron P. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 1989, 57(6):1361-1401.
36. Perron P. Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Journal of Econometrics 1997, 80(2):355-385.
37. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2001, 16(3):289-326.
38. Pesaran M.H., Pesaran B. Working with Microfit 5.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. S. Strøm (Ed.).
40. Phillips P.C.B., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988, 75(2):335-346.
41. Pradhan R.P. Modelling the nexus between energy consumption and economic growth in India. The IUP Journal of Infrastructure 2010, 8(1&2):51-58.
42. Roca J., Padilla E., Farre M., Galletto C. Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics 2001, 39(1):85-99.
43. Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-section evidence. Background Paper for the 1992 World Development Report 1992, The World Bank, Washington DC.
44. Shen J. Trade liberalisation and environmental degradation in China. Applied Economics 2008, 40(8):997-1004.
45. Soytas U., Sari R., Ewing T. Energy consumption, income and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 2007, 62(3/4):482-489.
46. Stern D.I. The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development 2004, 32(8):1419-1439.
47. Vincent J.R. Test for environmental Kuznets curve within a developing country. Environmental and Development Economics 1997, 2(4):417-431.
48. Weber C.L., Peters G.P., Guan D., Hubacek K. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy 2008, 36(9):3572-3577.
49. Wolde-Rufael Y. Electricity consumption and economic growth: a time series experience for 17 African countries. Energy Economics 2006, 34(10):1106-1114.
50. World Bank, 2010. World development indicators, Geneva.
51. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):350-356.
52. Yang H.Y. A note on the casual relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energy Economics 2000, 22(3):309-317.
53. 2 emissions between Japan and China. Environmental and Development Economics 2007, 12(3):445-470.