Comparison of different conditions, substrates and operation modes by dynamic simulation of a full-scale anaerobic SBR plant

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 558-566

  Ronner Holm S G E ^a   Zak, A ^b   Holm, N C ^a  

^a LimnoTec Abwasseranlagen GmbH   (Germany)

^b LUBLIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

ADM1; Anaerobic digestion; ASBR; Dynamic simulation; Full scale; Optimization

Indexed keywords

ADM1; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION MODEL NO. 1; ASBR; DIGESTION EFFICIENCY; FOOD FACTORIES; FULL SCALE; FULL-SCALE PLANTS; GAS PRODUCTIONS; MESOPHILIC; OPERATION MODE; PROCESS WATER; SBR PLANTS; SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTORS; SIMULATION STUDIES; THERMOPHILIC DIGESTERS; THERMOPHILIC REACTORS; VEGETABLE WASTES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

BATCH REACTORS; BIOGAS; BIOSOLIDS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EFFLUENTS; OPTIMIZATION; PULP DIGESTERS; VEGETABLES; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS;

BIOSOLID; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EFFLUENT; FOOD INDUSTRY; FRACTIONATION; GAS PRODUCTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PH; SUBSTRATE; VEGETABLE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIOSOLID; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRACTIONATION; PH; PROCESS MODEL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SOLID WASTE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOREACTORS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; SEWAGE; TEMPERATURE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER;

EID: 84856264573     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.887     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Banks, C. J., Salter, A. M. & Chesshire, M. 2007 Potential of anaerobic digestion for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and production of renewable energy from agriculture: barriers and incentives to widespread adoption in Europe. Wat. Sci. Tech. 55 (10), 165-173. (Pubitemid 46881435)
2. Batstone,D. J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kaluzhnyi, S.V., Pavlostatis, S. G., Rozzi, A., Sanders,W. T. M., Siegrist, H.& Vavilin 2002 Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1, Scientific and Technical Report No. 13. IWAPublishing, London, ISBN:1 900222 78 7.
3. Gannoun, H., Othman, B. N. & Moktar, H. 2007 Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewaters and abattoir wastewaters in an upflow anaerobic filter. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 6737-6743. (Pubitemid 350013715)
4. Girault, R., Steyer, J.-P., Batstone, D. J., Jensen, P. D., Nopens, I., Zaher, U., Sadowski, A.-G., Béline, F., Żak, A., Kujawski, O., Holm, N. C. & Rönner-Holm, S. G. E. 2010 Influent fractionation and parameter calibration for ADM1: Lab-scale and full-scale experiments. In Proceedings of the 2nd Wastewater Treatment Modelling Seminar, Canada, Quebec, pp. 171-182.
5. Henze, M., Harremoes, P., Jansen, J. l. C. & Arvin, E. 2002 Wastewater Treatment. Biological and Chemical Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Holst, T. C., Truc, A. & Pujol, R. 1997 Anaerobic fluidized beds: ten years of industrial experience. Wat. Sci. Tech. 36 (6-7), 415-422. (Pubitemid 27519354)
7. Jeison, D. & van Lier, J. 2008 Anaerobic wastewater treatment and membrane filtration: a one night stand or a sustainable relationship? Wat. Sci. Tech. 57 (4), 527-532. (Pubitemid 351577832)
8. Jetten, M. S. M., Horn, S. J. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. 1997 Towards a more sustainable municipal wastewater treatment system. Wat. Sci. Tech. 35 (9), 171-180. (Pubitemid 27303551)
9. Kleerebezem, R. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. 2006 Waste characterization for implementation in ADM1. Wat. Sci. Tech. 54 (4), 157-174.
10. Lettinga, G. 1995 Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems. Anthonie van Leeuwenhoek 67, 3-28.
11. Lübken, M., Wichern, M., Schaltmann, M., Gronauer, A. & Horth, H. 2007 Modeling the energy balance of an anaerobic digester fed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops. Wat. Res. 41, 4085-4096. (Pubitemid 47418951)
12. Naumann, C. & Bassler, R. 1993 Die Chemische Untersuchung Von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA-Methodenbuch Band III, Darmstadt.
13. Riesebieter, H. 2008 Bilanzierung der Biogasbildung mittels vergleichender Input-Output-Bilanzierung von CSB, oTS, Nges und Pges am Beispiel der nach dem FAR-SBRVerfahren betriebenen mesophilen und thermophilen Fermentern bei der Firma Gemüse Meyer (Balancing of biogas production by the help of Input-Output analysis COD, VS, Ntotal and Ptotal for biogas plant of Gemüse Meyer Company). Diploma Thesis, University of Applied Sciences Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Germany.
14. Rönner-Holm, S., Mennerich, A. & Holm, N. 2006 Specific SBR population behavior as revealed by comparative dynamic simulation analysis of three full-scale municipal SBR wastewater treatment plants. Wat. Sci. Tech. 54 (1), 71-80. (Pubitemid 44150720)
15. Wichern, M., Gehring, T., Fischer, K., Andrade, D., Lübken, M., Koch, K., Gronauer, A. & Horn, H. 2008 Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: measurements and mathematical modeling with ADM1. Biores. Tech. 100, 1675-1681. (Pubitemid 50316049)
16. Yasui, H., Goela, R., Lib, Y. Y. & Noikec, T. 2008 Modified ADM1 structure for modelling municipal primary sludge hydrolysis. Wat. Res. 42 (1-2), 249-259. (Pubitemid 350296227)
17. Żak, A. 2009 Metody frakcjonowania substratu dla modelu ADM1 na przykładzie biogazowni Gemüse-Meyer (Methods of substrates fractionation for ADM1 Model on example Gemüse-Meyer biogas plant). Diploma Thesis, Lublin University of Technology, Poland.